On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I reviewed the files in SVN and build a patch to reflect
the change. I also updated the information about former Jakarta projects
that moved to their own top level project (Velocity and Struts)
Hi,
I noticed some inconsistencies in the copyright files of the Apache
Commons packages:
- Some packages still have the old Apache Software License 1.1, but they
have been released with the AL 2.0. It affects the following packages:
dbcp, codec, discovery, fileupload, jxpath, lang,
Le vendredi 12 juin 2009 09:56:47, Marcus Better a écrit :
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I reviewed the files in SVN and build a patch to reflect
the change. I also updated the information about former Jakarta projects
that moved to their own top level project (Velocity and Struts)
Thanks a lot!
Damien Raude-Morvan a écrit :
It is obvious, but don't forget tu update debian/changelog (description +
credits to Emmanuel Bourg) as this patch doesn't include those files.
Thank you but don't bother with the attribution, this is a trivial change.
Emmanuel Bourg
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Emmanuel Bourgebo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I noticed some inconsistencies in the copyright files of the Apache Commons
packages:
- Some packages still have the old Apache Software License 1.1, but they
have been released with the AL 2.0. It affects the
Onkar Shinde a écrit :
Is the new license applicable to the versions of these packages in
repository? If yes then a bug should be filed for every such package
with severity 'serious'.
If the new license is applicable to the versions not yet in repository
then someone needs to update the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
It is obvious, but don't forget tu update debian/changelog (description +
credits to Emmanuel Bourg) as this patch doesn't include those files.
I don't think this trivial change warrants a changelog entry. If you are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I checked the packages, the upstream releases of the versions in the
repository are all licensed under the Apache License 2.0.
Ouch.
Is it necessary to file a bug of each package, or it is possible to file
only one bug
Package: libcommons-codec-java
Version: 1.3-4
Severity: serious
The license in the package (Apache License 1.1) doesn't match the
license of the upstream release (Apache License 2.0)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_3/LICENSE.txt
Package: libcommons-validator-java
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
The license in the package (Apache License 1.1) doesn't match the
license of the upstream release (Apache License 2.0)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/validator/tags/VALIDATOR_1_3_1/LICENSE.txt
Package: libcommons-fileupload-java
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
The license in the package (Apache License 1.1) doesn't match the
license of the upstream release (Apache License 2.0)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/fileupload/tags/commons-fileupload-1.2.1/LICENSE.txt
Package: libcommons-lang-java
Version: 2.4-1
Severity: serious
The license in the package (Apache License 1.1) doesn't match the
license of the upstream release (Apache License 2.0)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_2_4/LICENSE.txt
Package: libcommons-dbcp-java
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: serious
The license in the package (Apache License 1.1) doesn't match the
license of the upstream release (Apache License 2.0)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/dbcp/tags/DBCP_1_2_2/LICENSE.txt
Package: libcommons-discovery-java
Version: 0.4-2
Severity: serious
The license in the package (Apache License 1.1) doesn't match the
license of the upstream release (Apache License 2.0)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/discovery/tags/DISCOVERY_0_4/LICENSE.txt
Package: libcommons-jxpath-java
Version: 1.2-7
Severity: serious
The license in the package (Apache License 1.1) doesn't match the
license of the upstream release (Apache License 2.0)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jxpath/tags/JXPATH_1_2/LICENSE.txt
FYI: The status of the libjaxp1.2-java source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.2.01-3
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney
FYI: The status of the simplyhtml source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.12.3+dfsg-3
Current version: 0.13.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Attention email account Owner,
We contacted yesterday to reconfirm your account information to avoid loss
of your account detail. We hereby bring to your notice once again that the
details of this email account are already deleted from our database and in
a short time, your email account may
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 521478 + pending
Bug#521478: Updating the asm Uploaders list
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 521480 + pending
Bug#521480: Updating the asm3 Uploaders list
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 521479 + pending
Bug#521479: Updating the asm2 Uploaders list
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#junit4 (4.6-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * debian/build.xml:
#Add hamcrest-core.jar in Class-Path using junit4.jar Manifest file.
#Thanks to Florian Weimer. (Closes: #527308)
#
package junit4
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: junit4
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 157696 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20547
Bug#157696: ant: junitbatchtest attempts to run tests in abstract classes
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:53:54 +0200, Marcus Better mar...@better.se wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
It is obvious, but don't forget tu update debian/changelog (description
+
credits to Emmanuel Bourg) as this patch doesn't include those files.
24 matches
Mail list logo
