Bug#612124: libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to hidden special character

2011-06-30 Thread Jonathan Nieder
tags 612124 + moreinfo severity 612124 important quit Hi Martin, Martin Millnert wrote: [Subject: libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to hidden special character] Unfortunately the above description seems to fall into the the tachyon modulation must be wrongly polarised category

Processed: Re: libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to hidden special character

2011-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 612124 + moreinfo Bug #612124 [libxerces2-java] libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to hidden special character Added tag(s) moreinfo. severity 612124 important Bug #612124 [libxerces2-java] libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to

Bug#632183: bouncycastle: Package does not deploy maven artifacts

2011-06-30 Thread James Page
Package: bouncycastle Version: 1.44+dfsg-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch *** /tmp/tmpC7BqQ4 In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Deployment of Maven artifacts: - debian/rules:

Bug#612124: Acknowledgement (libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to hidden special character)

2011-06-30 Thread Martin Millnert
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 11:53 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: Hi! * Martin Millnert mar...@millnert.se [2011-02-06 06:24:04 CET]: Update2: dpkg can install the .deb. apt-get and aptitude also can install the package. Conclusion-suggestion: Dependency resolution in apt/aptitude is broken

Bug#612124: Acknowledgement (libxerces2-java: Depends-line broken due to hidden special character)

2011-06-30 Thread Martin Millnert
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 12:03 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: Hi Your problem is most likely that recommends are being installed by default and libxerces2-java recommends libxerces2-java-gcj. (It could also come from a dependency of libxerces2-java(-gcj)) Installing recommends by default was

Bug#629852: openjdk-6?

2011-06-30 Thread Harald Staub
The security tracker still shows openjdk-6 as needs to be checked, e.g.: http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-0872 OTOH, Ubuntu has issued a Security Notice for openjdk-6 on June 17: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1154-1/ So I should assume the Debian stable package to be

Processing of swt-gtk_3.7-1_amd64.changes

2011-06-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
swt-gtk_3.7-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: swt-gtk_3.7-1.dsc swt-gtk_3.7.orig.tar.gz swt-gtk_3.7-1.diff.gz libswt-gtk-3-java_3.7-1_amd64.deb libswt-gtk-3-jni_3.7-1_amd64.deb libswt-gnome-gtk-3-jni_3.7-1_amd64.deb

Bug#629852: openjdk-6?

2011-06-30 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi, Le jeudi 30 juin 2011 18:20:03, Harald Staub a écrit : The security tracker still shows openjdk-6 as needs to be checked, e.g.: http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2011-0872 OTOH, Ubuntu has issued a Security Notice for openjdk-6 on June 17:

Processing of libspring-ldap-java_1.3.1.RELEASE-2_amd64.changes

2011-06-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libspring-ldap-java_1.3.1.RELEASE-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libspring-ldap-java_1.3.1.RELEASE-2.dsc libspring-ldap-java_1.3.1.RELEASE-2.debian.tar.gz libspring-ldap-java_1.3.1.RELEASE-2_all.deb libspring-ldap-java-doc_1.3.1.RELEASE-2_all.deb

[SCM] Debian packaging for swt-gtk. annotated tag, debian/3.7-1, created. debian/3.7-1

2011-06-30 Thread Tony Mancill
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project Debian packaging for swt-gtk.. The annotated tag, debian/3.7-1 has been created at 7be1039691e36943f928eff2bf5a572851c37adf (tag)

swt-gtk_3.7-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-06-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: libswt-cairo-gtk-3-jni_3.7-1_amd64.deb to main/s/swt-gtk/libswt-cairo-gtk-3-jni_3.7-1_amd64.deb libswt-glx-gtk-3-jni_3.7-1_amd64.deb to main/s/swt-gtk/libswt-glx-gtk-3-jni_3.7-1_amd64.deb libswt-gnome-gtk-3-jni_3.7-1_amd64.deb to

libspring-ldap-java_1.3.1.RELEASE-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-06-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: libspring-ldap-java-doc_1.3.1.RELEASE-2_all.deb to main/libs/libspring-ldap-java/libspring-ldap-java-doc_1.3.1.RELEASE-2_all.deb libspring-ldap-java_1.3.1.RELEASE-2.debian.tar.gz to main/libs/libspring-ldap-java/libspring-ldap-java_1.3.1.RELEASE-2.debian.tar.gz

Bug#632085: marked as done (libspring-ldap-java: Package does not deploy maven artefacts)

2011-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:49:54 + with message-id e1qcobo-0007yj...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#632085: fixed in libspring-ldap-java 1.3.1.RELEASE-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #632085, regarding libspring-ldap-java: Package does not deploy maven artefacts to be

Processed: severity of 618725 is grave

2011-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 618725 grave Bug #618725 [sun-java6-plugin] sun-java6-plugin: Any java applet I've tried throws a `ClassNotFoundException' Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processing of httpcomponents-client_4.1.1-1_amd64.changes

2011-06-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
httpcomponents-client_4.1.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: httpcomponents-client_4.1.1-1.dsc httpcomponents-client_4.1.1.orig.tar.gz httpcomponents-client_4.1.1-1.debian.tar.gz libhttpclient-java_4.1.1-1_all.deb libhttpmime-java_4.1.1-1_all.deb

httpcomponents-client_4.1.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-06-30 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: httpcomponents-client_4.1.1-1.debian.tar.gz to main/h/httpcomponents-client/httpcomponents-client_4.1.1-1.debian.tar.gz httpcomponents-client_4.1.1-1.dsc to main/h/httpcomponents-client/httpcomponents-client_4.1.1-1.dsc httpcomponents-client_4.1.1.orig.tar.gz to