Bug#725017: closed by Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de (Bug#713144: fixed in freemind 0.9.0+dfsg-3)

Hi, On 18/10/13 19:52, Edward Welbourne wrote: Do you know of other applications that use the same UI toolset, that I could test out to see if they have the same problem ? As former maintainer of the Freeplane/FreeMind packages, let me jump in here: we often used jedit in the past as a guinea

Bug#726879: jedit: depends solely on virtual packages (javaX-runtime)

Package: jedit Version: 5.0.0+dfsg-3 Severity: normal Hi, I just noticed that jedit depends only on java7-runtime | java6-runtime, which are both virtual packages. It is allegedly a breach of policy, I've been told but the only place I could find is chapter 7.4: To specify which of a

Bug#725017: closed by Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de (Bug#713144: fixed in freemind 0.9.0+dfsg-3)

we often used jedit in the past as a guinea pig that shows if a problem is due to Java and its environment, or to FreeMind/Freeplane. Installed jedit, ran it; it's ignoring keyboard input, too. So sounds like Java's the actual problem. The alternatives system is using java-7-openjdk-amd64.

Processed: tagging 726879

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 726879 + pending Bug #726879 [jedit] jedit: depends solely on virtual packages (javaX-runtime) Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 726879:

Processing of rsyntaxtextarea_2.5.0-1_amd64.changes

rsyntaxtextarea_2.5.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rsyntaxtextarea_2.5.0-1.dsc rsyntaxtextarea_2.5.0.orig.tar.gz rsyntaxtextarea_2.5.0-1.debian.tar.gz librsyntaxtextarea-java_2.5.0-1_all.deb librsyntaxtextarea-java-doc_2.5.0-1_all.deb

rsyntaxtextarea_2.5.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:10:31 +0200 Source: rsyntaxtextarea Binary: librsyntaxtextarea-java librsyntaxtextarea-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2.5.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java

Processing of jedit_5.0.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes

jedit_5.0.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jedit_5.0.0+dfsg-4.dsc jedit_5.0.0+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz jedit_5.0.0+dfsg-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of

jedit_5.0.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:01:04 -0700 Source: jedit Binary: jedit Architecture: source all Version: 5.0.0+dfsg-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Bug#726879: marked as done (jedit: depends solely on virtual packages (javaX-runtime))

Your message dated Sun, 20 Oct 2013 23:03:36 + with message-id e1vy224-0002pz...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#726879: fixed in jedit 5.0.0+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #726879, regarding jedit: depends solely on virtual packages (javaX-runtime) to be marked as done. This

Processing of jedit_5.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

jedit_5.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jedit_5.1.0+dfsg-1.dsc jedit_5.1.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz jedit_5.1.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz jedit_5.1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __

jedit_5.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 21:35:04 -0700 Source: jedit Binary: jedit Architecture: source all Version: 5.1.0+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers