On Mon, 17. Mar 20:38 Thorsten Alteholz alteh...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
Upstream just states that their own license is _similar_ to the Apache
license.
But this is not true. It is similar to an ancient version. It is by
far not similar to what is nowadays called Apache license. But
this is
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Markus Koschany wrote:
The whole bug report is bean counting. There is either a problem with
wrong licenses and a policy violation or not. Please take a closer took
at those files. None of them is licensed under the Apache license. It is
completely absurd what you are
Le 12/03/2014 12:37, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
please add the missing licenses of:
jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\contrib\src\resources\hamlet.xml
jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\core\package\META-INF\jdom-info.xml
jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\core\samples\* (some of them)
jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\maven\maven.pom to debian/copyright (or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 741419 - moreinfo + pending
Bug #741419 [libjdom2-java] missing license in debian/copyright
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #741419 [libjdom2-java] missing license in debian/copyright
Added tag(s) pending.
severity 741419 minor
Bug #741419
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 12/03/2014 12:37, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
please add the missing licenses of:
jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\contrib\src\resources\hamlet.xml
jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\core\package\META-INF\jdom-info.xml
jdom-JDOM-2.0.5\core\samples\* (some of them)
This bug (potentially) affect ~40 packages... Would you like a friendly NMU to
fix it?
--
Regards,
Dmitry Smirnov
GPG key : 4096R/53968D1B
---
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the
results.
-- Winston Churchill
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Hi Dmitry,
I checked the suggested regexp and I confirm it parses properly the
manifest entries. It's a bit sad to add a dependency on perl just for
this though.
Could you please commit your changes on alioth and upload a regular
update instead? That would save the need to ack a NMU.
Emmanuel
Hi Emmanuel,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:33:50 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I checked the suggested regexp and I confirm it parses properly the
manifest entries. It's a bit sad to add a dependency on perl just for
this though.
Thanks for double-checking my fix. Although I added perl to Depends I'm not
On 2014-03-19 02:23, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:33:50 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I checked the suggested regexp and I confirm it parses properly the
manifest entries. It's a bit sad to add a dependency on perl just for
this though.
Thanks for
9 matches
Mail list logo