Bug#778274: marked as done (mauve: please make the build reproducible)

2015-02-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:19:54 + with message-id e1ymdlm-oo...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#778274: fixed in mauve 20140821-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #778274, regarding mauve: please make the build reproducible to be marked as done. This means that you

mauve_20140821-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:49:48 +0100 Source: mauve Binary: mauve Architecture: source all Version: 20140821-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Processing of mauve_20140821-2_amd64.changes

2015-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
mauve_20140821-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mauve_20140821-2.dsc mauve_20140821-2.debian.tar.xz mauve_20140821-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of

Bug#776087: nailgun: Please provide Maven artifacts

2015-02-13 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 08:14:45AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: owner 776087 ! thanks I'm working on updating nailgun to 0.9.1 (leveraging Hideki's work in the packaging repo) and will add the maven artifacts to that upload. Hi Tony, I hope to have not duplicated work with you on this. I

Bug#776087: nailgun: Please provide Maven artifacts

2015-02-13 Thread tony
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:20:39PM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 08:14:45AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: owner 776087 ! thanks I'm working on updating nailgun to 0.9.1 (leveraging Hideki's work in the packaging repo) and will add the maven artifacts to that

Processed: your mail

2015-02-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: unarchive 769698 Bug #769698 {Done: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org} [src:libspring-java] libspring-java: CVE-2014-3625 Directory Traversal in Spring Framework Unarchived Bug 769698 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Processed: your mail

2015-02-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 760733 3.0.5.RELEASE-2 Bug #760733 [src:libspring-java] CVE-2014-3578: directory traversal Marked as found in versions libspring-java/3.0.5.RELEASE-2. fixed 760733 3.2.12-1 Bug #760733 [src:libspring-java] CVE-2014-3578: directory traversal

Processing of dbus-java_2.8-6_amd64.changes

2015-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
dbus-java_2.8-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dbus-java_2.8-6.dsc dbus-java_2.8-6.debian.tar.xz libdbus-java_2.8-6_all.deb dbus-java-bin_2.8-6_all.deb libdbus-java-doc_2.8-6_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

Bug#503815: marked as done (missing alternate dependency on java-runtime6{,-headless})

2015-02-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:48:29 + with message-id e1ymp2d-0005tk...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#503815: fixed in dbus-java 2.8-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #503815, regarding missing alternate dependency on java-runtime6{,-headless} to be marked as done. This

Processed: still need to be fixed in unstable

2015-02-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: found 769698 3.0.5.RELEASE-2 Bug #769698 {Done: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org} [src:libspring-java] libspring-java: CVE-2014-3625 Directory Traversal in Spring Framework Marked as found in versions libspring-java/3.0.5.RELEASE-2. notfound

dbus-java_2.8-6_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-02-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 23:02:32 +0100 Source: dbus-java Binary: libdbus-java dbus-java-bin libdbus-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 2.8-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Bug#503815: missing alternate dependency on java-runtime6{, -headless}

2015-02-13 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:37:35 + Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org wrote: So? it depends on openjdk-6-jre. That's all you need to run it, it installs in and explicitly uses it to run it, whatever your alternatives setting. I've not tested cacao and it's not supported. I use some fairly