Bug#559967: FTBFS [hppa]: method openConnection() in the type URL is not...

2009-12-14 Thread Andrew Haley
On 12/14/2009 04:58 PM, dann frazier wrote: On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 02:10:18PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: AFAIK, GCJ uses classpath library these days. The code from classpath is being merged in GCJ. And from the status of classpath [1] it is clear that

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-05 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-05 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: Andrew Haley wrote: OK, I've found it. The ClassNotFoundException is thrown from a security check in libgcj. We are calling Method m1 from method m0, and m1's class loader is different from m0's class loader. We have to check that for every arg in m1, the actual type

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-04 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:50:38PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote: Hello, A while ago, I wrote: Using the following pakages: * java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2 * ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1 * libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3 *

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK 1 java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.core.runtime.Plugin

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:01:03PM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:35:28AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: And what was the reason? I need to know. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 4 0 2008-03-02 12:38:50.196 !MESSAGE Application error !STACK

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-03-02 Thread Andrew Haley
Andrew Haley wrote: There are areas where compliant jvms might behave differently. For example, the exact time when dependent classes are loaded isn't defined. Maybe at class initialization time, maybe later. All the the spec requires is that ClassNotFoundExceptions aren't raised until

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-17 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:33:21AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls Runtime.exit()? I tried to debug this but I dont found

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-16 Thread Andrew Haley
Thomas Girard wrote: Hello, A while ago, I wrote: Using the following pakages: * java-gcj-compat{,-dev} 1.0.69-2 * ecj, ecj-gcj, libecj-java and libecj-gcj 3.3.0+0728-1 * libgcj-bc, libgcj8{-1,-1-awt,-jar} 4.2.1-3 * gcc-4.2-base 4.2.1-3 * gcj-4.1-base, gcj-4.1, gij-4.1,

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS with gcj-4.2

2008-02-16 Thread Andrew Haley
Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:56:18AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: Has anyone actually attempted to debug this? Which code actually calls Runtime.exit()? I tried to debug this but I dont found out from where exit is called with code 13. What went wrong with the debugging

Re: RFH: Illegal instruction error building docbook-xsl-saxon(-gcj) on arm architecture

2008-02-06 Thread Andrew Haley
Daniel Leidert wrote: The arm-buildd failed to build docbook-xsl-saxon(-gcj) with an illegal instruction error. You can find the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=docbook-xsl-saxon;ver=1.00.dfsg.1-3;arch=arm;stamp=1202259174 A bug in GIJ? Anybody an idea? I do not

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS

2007-10-22 Thread Andrew Haley
Thomas Girard writes: Le mercredi 10 octobre 2007 à 12:36 +0200, Thomas Girard a écrit : Just another hint on this one: using etch to recompile eclipse-cdt *does* work. So it's likely a problem in the toolchain. Moving from an etch chroot to sid, I was able to find out that the

Bug#432541: eclipse-cdt FTBFS

2007-10-22 Thread Andrew Haley
Thomas Girard writes: It built successfully in June[2], and started to fail building in July[3]. Ping Doko: what did you change in this time window? Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No.