Bug#893635: does not show up in GNOME's application menus

On 2018-04-02 02:49:12, Felix Natter wrote: > hello Antoine, > > I have got a reply from xdg from a user who has the same problem: > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2018-April/014010.html > > So it looks like this might be a GNOME(3) problem (or can you reproduce > this with KDE or

Bug#860567: fop LTS update package ready for testing

Hi, After much digging, I believe I have found the relevant issue and commits to fix the CVE-2017-5661 issue in fop. I have backported the patch to our 1.0 release in LTS and it seems to compile fine. However, I haven't performed any tests because I lack experience with that peculiar

Bug#860567: Wheezy update of fop?

Control: forwarded -1 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2668 On 2017-04-26 08:07:33, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Hi Ola, > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >> Dear maintainer(s), >> >> The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which

Bug#860566: batik package ready for testing

Hi, As previously mentioned, I have worked on an update for the Batik package. I have basically assumed the issue is the upstream BATIK-1139 issue, and used the patches refered to there: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1139 That may be incorrect and because we don't have a

Bug#860566: Wheezy update of batik?

On 2017-04-23 23:06:57, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 23/04/17 21:50, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >> Dear maintainer(s), >> >> The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are >> currently open in the Wheezy version of batik: >>

Bug#679616: jenkins: Please package a more recent upstream version

Package: jenkins Version: 1.447.2+dfsg-2 Followup-For: Bug #679616 severity 679616 grave thanks I think this should also be updated to the latest LTS, at least before the wheezy release. A freeze exception shouldn't be a problem considering the issues fixed are all critical and / or security: