Your message dated Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:47:42 +0100
with message-id <4b48a51e.2070...@thykier.net>
and subject line Fixed in 2.9.1+ds1-3~pre1
has caused the Debian Bug report #558184,
regarding missing OSGi metadata
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
558184: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558184
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: liblucene2-java
Version: 2.9.1+ds1-2
Severity: normal
User: pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: missing-osgi-metadata
Hi,
We are trying to make eclipse build from source using the jars from
Debian packages instead of the ones shipped together with eclipse;
however eclipse needs some OSGi metadata in the manifest file of the
jar files.
We believe that this package ships following jar files without this
OSGi-metadata (See [1] for more info):
lucene-analyzers.jar
lucene-core.jar
It may be helpful to see how Fedora has done this; since they are
further than us in this aspect. We have provided the link to the
Fedora VCS repository [2]. Please be aware that the naming convention
differ on Fedora. (e.g. libcommons-el-java is called jakarta-commons-el
in Fedora).
--
Thank you in advance,
Debian Orbital Alignment Team
(The team packaging eclipse)
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2009/11/msg00106.html
[2] http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/ (Warning: large page)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.9.1+ds1-3~pre1
Hi
Both Benjamin and I have successfully built eclipse against the lucene2
in experimental - all we had to do was to bump the expected version of
lucene2.
Thank you for your work,
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
