Your message dated Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:52:43 +0000
with message-id <b4ba7ea0-9416-6973-c562-b21cd61d3...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#835327: openjfx FTBFS on mips64el: error: static
assertion failed
has caused the Debian Bug report #835327,
regarding openjfx FTBFS on mips64el: error: static assertion failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
835327: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=835327
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openjfx
Version: 8u102-b14-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid + patch
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: mips-patch
Hello,
Package openjfx_8u102-b14-1 FTBFS on mips64el with following error:
> ../../../../src/main/native/Source/WTF/wtf/StdLibExtras.h:137:5: error:
> static assertion failed: bitwise_cast size of FromType and ToType must be
> equal!
> static_assert(sizeof(FromType) == sizeof(ToType), "bitwise_cast size of
> FromType and ToType must be equal!");
Full build log:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openjfx&arch=mips64el&ver=8u102-b14-1&stamp=1470053666
Similar issue is already noticed for package webkitgtk
and resolved by adding support for mips64 architecture in Platform.h and
utils.h.
On the following links you can read more about this problem:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754358
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789261
I have created and attached a patch that resolves this issue.
With this patch package builds successfully.
Regards,
Radovan
--- openjfx-8u102-b14.orig/modules/web/src/main/native/Source/WTF/wtf/Platform.h
+++ openjfx-8u102-b14/modules/web/src/main/native/Source/WTF/wtf/Platform.h
@@ -88,16 +88,19 @@
#endif
#endif
-/* CPU(MIPS) - MIPS 32-bit */
-/* Note: Only O32 ABI is tested, so we enable it for O32 ABI for now. */
-#if (defined(mips) || defined(__mips__) || defined(MIPS) || defined(_MIPS_)) \
- && defined(_ABIO32)
+/* CPU(MIPS) - MIPS 32-bit and 64-bit */
+#if (defined(mips) || defined(__mips__) || defined(MIPS) || defined(_MIPS_) || defined(__mips64))
+#if defined(_ABI64) && (_MIPS_SIM == _ABI64)
+#define WTF_CPU_MIPS64 1
+#define WTF_MIPS_ARCH __mips64
+#else
#define WTF_CPU_MIPS 1
+#define WTF_MIPS_ARCH __mips
+#endif
#if defined(__MIPSEB__)
#define WTF_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN 1
#endif
#define WTF_MIPS_PIC (defined __PIC__)
-#define WTF_MIPS_ARCH __mips
#define WTF_MIPS_ISA(v) (defined WTF_MIPS_ARCH && WTF_MIPS_ARCH == v)
#define WTF_MIPS_ISA_AT_LEAST(v) (defined WTF_MIPS_ARCH && WTF_MIPS_ARCH >= v)
#define WTF_MIPS_ARCH_REV __mips_isa_rev
@@ -678,6 +681,7 @@
|| CPU(ALPHA) \
|| CPU(ARM64) \
|| CPU(S390X) \
+ || CPU(MIPS64) \
|| CPU(PPC64)
#define WTF_USE_JSVALUE64 1
#else
--- openjfx-8u102-b14.orig/modules/web/src/main/native/Source/WTF/wtf/dtoa/utils.h
+++ openjfx-8u102-b14/modules/web/src/main/native/Source/WTF/wtf/dtoa/utils.h
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
defined(__ARMEL__) || \
defined(_MIPS_ARCH_MIPS32R2)
#define DOUBLE_CONVERSION_CORRECT_DOUBLE_OPERATIONS 1
-#elif CPU(MIPS) || CPU(PPC) || CPU(PPC64) || OS(WINCE) || CPU(SH4) || CPU(S390) || CPU(S390X) || CPU(IA64) || CPU(ALPHA) || CPU(ARM64) || CPU(HPPA)
+#elif CPU(MIPS) || CPU(MIPS64) || CPU(PPC) || CPU(PPC64) || OS(WINCE) || CPU(SH4) || CPU(S390) || CPU(S390X) || CPU(IA64) || CPU(ALPHA) || CPU(ARM64) || CPU(HPPA)
#define DOUBLE_CONVERSION_CORRECT_DOUBLE_OPERATIONS 1
#elif defined(_M_IX86) || defined(__i386__)
#if defined(_WIN32)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 8u141-b14-3
Hi,
On 04/10/17 10:50, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Radovan,
>
> Thanks a lot for the patch. openjfx/8u131-b11-2 built successfully on
> mips64el without this patch [1]. Is it still necessary?
[I checked 8u141-b14-3 which is conveniently still in testing]
It looks like the patch has already been applied. Probably it was
applied to upstream webkitgtk and later pulled in by openjfx.
James
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
