Did you receive my last email concerning freehep-swing (quoted below)? I
didn't receive any answer, is this because you have no time for it or
because there were technical problems with email?
Giovanni.
Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto:
Hi,
(Cc:-ing Gabriele Giacone, comaintainer with me)
the full text of the license if it can be proven
is OK, though I am not sure I agree with it so just re-upload.
Also, you are missing at least a couple of copyright holders in
debian/copyright. CERN and SLAC.
Should I cite them? I cited the real authors (working for CERN or SLAC
or other
the specific issue to be honest. The best thing to do then
would be to cite in debian/copyright which files are LGPL-2.1 and which are
LGPL-3. Apparently not having the full text of the license if it can be
proven
is OK, though I am not sure I agree with it so just re-upload.
All files
Paul McEnery wrote:
I'm looking for some advice on how best to package a particular Java
application. The application in question is SB-MASE
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/sbmase/).
The package is provided with a classes directory with a start.bat
file which runs java pointing to the Main
Re: Melhor convidar.
Esta é a sauda??o de Eiorder LTD., Um dos grandes atacadista e varejista em
Elétrica China.We principalmente vender produtos elétricos tais como cameras
digitais, celulares, TV LCD, Xbox, Laptops, DV, Mp4, GPS, Electric Guitar.
Visite nosso Web Site: www, aomibuy, com
Hi,
(Cc:-ing Gabriele Giacone, comaintainer with me)
Barry deFreese ha scritto:
Hello maintainer,
The orig.tar.gz for FreeHEP swing doesn't seem to carry a LICENSE or COPYING
file and I cannot find any mention of the GPL in any headers. Where are you
getting that it is licensed under
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 507536 560398
Bug#507536: eclipse: fails to start due to xulrunner - workaround; disable
welcome screen.
Bug#560398: eclipse: Eclipse does not start: JVM terminated. Exit code=127
Bug#511713: eclipse: fails to start due to xulrunner -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 518433 important
Bug #518433 [libxalan2-java] XALANJ-2430 - Xalan 2.7.1 won't compile an xslt
when a recursive template is used in a global variable.
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 507536 560162 556780
Bug#507536: eclipse: fails to start due to xulrunner - workaround; disable
welcome screen.
Bug#556780: eclipse does not start (java.lang.RuntimeException: Widget disposed
too early!)
Bug#560162: eclipse: 'An error
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 559765
Bug #559765 {Done: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net} [jetty] jetty:
CVE-2007-6672 info disclosure
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 559765 + wontfix
Bug #559765 [jetty] jetty: CVE-2007-6672 info disclosure
Added tag(s) wontfix.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 558693 + confirmed
Bug #558693 [eclipse] eclipse: does not start at all
Added tag(s) confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Hello!
I am rejecting simple-xml. Debian/copyright states the files are LGPL-2.1
but I cannot find anywhere in the file headers nor any COPYING or LICENSE
file that states they are 2.1, but rather just LGPL. Am I missing it?
In the sourcecode files of simple-xml the following header is
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 558246 + confirmed
Bug #558246 [eclipse] eclipse recommends eclipse-gcj, not available for 3.4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Onkar Shinde wrote:
Forwarding to correct mailing list.
Should anyone update this page
http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/developers.html ?
G
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 553131 553133
Bug#553131: libswt3.4-gtk-jni: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by
./usr/lib/jni/libswt-atk-gtk-3449.so and 7 others but the package
doesn't depend on the C library package. Normally this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 552480 = confirmed
Bug #552480 [eclipse] eclipse: GTK dialog stopped working
Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Michael Koch wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:25:13AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 02:31:53PM +, Jan-Pascal van Best wrote:
* Added missing dependency on libicu4j-java (for contrib/collation)
* Added missing dependency on libjtidy-java (for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 552176 RM: libqdwizard-java -- RoM; not needed anymore
Bug #552176 [libqdwizard-java] libqdwizard-java: maybe we should remove this
package from archive ?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: libqdwizard-java -- RoM; not needed anymore' from
reassign 552480 eclipse
thanks
On Montag, 26. Oktober 2009, Martin wrote:
Package: base
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
A week about the file search dialog in Eclipse stopped working. I tested
it with eclipse Ganymede and Galileo from eclipse.org.
When I type in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 552480 eclipse
Bug #552480 [base] base: GTK dialog stopped working
Bug reassigned from package 'base' to 'eclipse'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hi Giovanni,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Giovanni Mascellani
mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it wrote:
What is wrong?
AFAIK the versions of maven-plugins are somewhat hard coded but you
can patch out the maven-assembly-plugin from pom.xml. I think it is
not needed for the Debian package.
Hi Giovanni,
Welcome aboard ! :)
[You should post to debian-j...@lists.debian.org as pkg-java-
maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org is just a read-only list to monitor
uploads and bugs on our packages]
Le lundi 26 octobre 2009 21:31:45, Torsten Werner a écrit :
Hi Giovanni,
On Mon, Oct 26,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package jftp
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'jftp'
Limit currently set to 'package':'jftp'
tags 552174 + pending
Bug #552174 [jftp] jftp: please don't depend on slide-webdavclient
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# This is the same problem really - just represented differently
# in different versions and later versions support xulrunner 1.9
forcemerge 507536 538871
Bug#507536: eclipse: undefined symbol: _ZN4nsID5ParseEPKc
Bug#538871: eclipse: Fails to
Am Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2009 22:02:00 schrieb Fabian Köster:
Am Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2009 21:07:02 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
Hello Barry,
Le mardi 13 octobre 2009 à 18:13 +, Barry deFreese a écrit :
Hello maintainer,
I am trying to get some clarity on simple-xml. In
Hello Barry,
Le mardi 13 octobre 2009 à 18:13 +, Barry deFreese a écrit :
Hello maintainer,
I am trying to get some clarity on simple-xml. In debian/copyright you
specify that the package is LGPL 2.1. However, I cannot find any indication
of a version of the LGPL the package is
Am Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2009 21:07:02 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru:
Hello Barry,
Le mardi 13 octobre 2009 à 18:13 +, Barry deFreese a écrit :
Hello maintainer,
I am trying to get some clarity on simple-xml. In debian/copyright you
specify that the package is LGPL 2.1. However, I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 550203 normal
Bug #550203 [jclassinfo] jclassinfo: Crash on java.util.HashMap with --all or
--disasm
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
tag 550203 confirmed
Bug #550203 [jclassinfo] jclassinfo: Crash on java.util.HashMap with --all
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 549838 + unreproducible
Bug #549838 [src:excalibur-logkit] excalibur-logkit: FTBFS: Nonexistent
build-dependency: libgeronimo-jms-1.1-spec-java
Bug #549839 [src:excalibur-logkit] excalibur-logkit: FTBFS: Nonexistent
build-dependency:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 549838 - unreproducible
Bug #549838 [src:excalibur-logkit] excalibur-logkit: FTBFS: Nonexistent
build-dependency: libgeronimo-jms-1.1-spec-java
Bug #549839 [src:excalibur-logkit] excalibur-logkit: FTBFS: Nonexistent
build-dependency:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it ok to go in pkg-java instead ?
I do not mind. Are you a member of the team?
Yup:
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi there,
Since this will be my first checkin to pkg-java SVN, I'd like to
make sure I am not doing anything wrong. I intend to svn commit the
following files:
https://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gdcm/Sandbox/debian-med/jmdns
The layout seems to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 548753 normal
Bug #548753 [vecmath1.2] vecmath1.2: should this package be removed?
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 548753 to the same value.
reassign 548753 ftp.debian.org
Bug #548753 [vecmath1.2] vecmath1.2: should this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 547735 bootchart
Bug #547735 [libcommons-compress-java] libcommons-compress-java: Breaks
bootchart (no TarInputStream)
Bug reassigned from package 'libcommons-compress-java' to 'bootchart'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
Torsten Werner wrote:
wrong/missing license and copyright statements:
COPYING: GPL-3+
src/java_crw_demo.c and src/java_crw_demo.h:
Copyright (c) 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
other license that seems to be incompatible to DFSG §6:
You acknowledge that this software is
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:20:24AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
Torsten Werner wrote:
wrong/missing license and copyright statements:
COPYING: GPL-3+
src/java_crw_demo.c and src/java_crw_demo.h:
Copyright (c) 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
other license that
snip
tijmp 0.8+dfsg-1 Build-Depends on openjdk-6-jdk instead of sun-java6-jdk.
Its currently waiting in NEW for processing.
Cheers,
Michael
Michael,
Yeah, I missed the change in build-dep, my screw up. Sorry for the noise!
Barry
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Bertels wrote:
Oh, before I forget. Something I've wanted to ask: Is there any interest
in taking the packages and officially make them part of Debian?
Yes, absolutely (see bugs #512396 and #502851). I'm not a DD so cannot
upload
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 10:03:26 schrieb Marcus Better:
Christopher Bertels wrote:
Seems unlikely that they would break API in a minor version of logback, so
it shouldn't be a problem.
Well, it builds fine with version 0.9.9 and doesn't build with the packaged
version (newer, = 1.0
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 502879 + pending
Bug #502879 [azureus] azureus: has problems decoding file names in some torrents
Added tag(s) pending.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Monday 21 September 2009 22:13:37 Marcus Better wrote:
It's up to you, but if you use git it is a good idea to keep separate
branches for upstream sources and debian packaging.
Yeah, makes more sense. I just put it all together for now, since i simply
wanted to keep track of changes. The
Hi,
I've got a buildable version ready, you can get the packages here:
http://files.kolab.org/apt/sesame2/
It's still not fully finished (need to clean up most packages - like adding
copyright etc...)
When starting Nepomuk, Sesame2 seems to get started as the storage backend,
but then I get
Hi Mathieu,
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it ok to go in pkg-java instead ?
I do not mind. Are you a member of the team?
Cheers,
Torsten
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Alright, I started working on it. Got aduna-commons-collections more or
less finished.
Great!
Other will follow. You can take a look here, if you want to:
- From a *very* quick look:
debian/control:
Standards-Version: 2.2
should be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Bertels wrote:
Are you using git-svn to mirror the upstream repo (which IIRC is using
svn), or just importing sources manually?
I've imported them manually via svn export. I guess I could set up a
mirror though, if that is a preferred
Hi,
On Thursday 17 September 2009 18:51:55 Christopher Bertels wrote:
From a quick inspection, the Spring jars found in the sesame2 jar are not
needed (although we have Spring Framework in Debian now). Most of the
rest is packaged by now except for the bunch of aduna-commons jars. These
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 21:20:46 Marcus Better wrote:
I looked at it briefly. See bugs #512396 and #502851. Feel free to take
over the ITP if you work on this.
Alright, I started working on it. Got aduna-commons-collections more or less
finished. Other will follow. You can take a look
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 517832 gcj-4.4 4.4.1-1
Bug #517832 [jsvc] jsvc: Tomcat5.5/s390 doesn't start with default JVM
Bug reassigned from package 'jsvc' to 'gcj-4.4'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions commons-daemon/1.0.2~svn20061127-9.
Bug #517832
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
I went through the list of our public packages listed here[1] and it
turns out that we have 7 packages depending on a non-free version of
java (as an alternative to a free or a java-runtimeN).
Eh? I checked azureus, and it correctly depends on
replying to debian-java
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
libjgroups-java:
Varun Hiremath (u)
Torsten Werner (u)
I have uploaded a fixed package.
weka:
Soeren Sonnenburg (u)
Torsten Werner (u)
This is a false positive
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:38:48PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi there,
Does anyone knows where are the debian/* files.
It seems Arnaud Vandyck did it at some point, according to:
https://jai-core.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35
Nothing in pkg-java SVN. Perhaps Arnaud has
Le 16 sept. 2009 à 16:00, Michael Koch a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:38:48PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Does anyone knows where are the debian/* files.
It seems Arnaud Vandyck did it at some point, according to:
https://jai-core.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=35
Nothing in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher Bertels wrote:
I was wondering if there have been any efforts towards packaging Sesame2
as a Soprano backend for use with Nepomuk?
I looked at it briefly. See bugs #512396 and #502851. Feel free to take over
the ITP if you work on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 376850 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #376850 [eclipse-platform] eclipse-platform-common: API Reference missing
Removed tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
found 376850 3.4.1-1
Bug #376850 [eclipse-platform] eclipse-platform-common: API
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 09:53:22PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi
After having looked at kaffe I have noticed it seems lacks maintenance
both from the Debian side but also upstream seems rather dead. We got an
120 days old FTBFS RC bug (#529872) and alternatives exists. So I
figured perhaps
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 546652 tomcat5.5
Bug #546652 [tomcat] tomcat init.d startup script should initialize HOME
directory
Warning: Unknown package 'tomcat'
Bug reassigned from package 'tomcat' to 'tomcat5.5'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions
Hi Niels,
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
the upstream version is 1.3 but the name of the jar file is
commons-jxpath-1.2.jar.
Cheers,
Torsten
___
Hi Niels,
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0~rc8+dfsg-1
of my package jarjar.
please provide some automatic way to create the dfsg clean orig
tarball (debian/rules get-orig-source).
Cheers,
Torsten
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 545631 + help
Bug #545631 [plexus-maven-plugin] plexus-maven-plugin: FTBFS: java errors
Added tag(s) help.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Hi Ludovic,
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Ludovic
Claudeludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote:
I'm pushing back quickly in SVN the fixes I made for the jetty6 package
into jetty, can you have a look at them and release them?
why do we have a new binary package libjetty-extra package now? What
was
Hi Torsten,
libjetty-setuid-java contained both Java and native code, and this
caused problems during the builds as highlighted by Thierry Carrez.
From Thieery Carrez:
Build on i386 succeeded (as it is the one used in the all build) but
amd64 fails (missing servlet and slf4j classes...)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 505596 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41303
Bug #505596 [classpath] FTBFS with GCC 4.4: dereferencing type-punned pointer...
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41303'.
tag 505596 +
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
[1] Three of these are already closed security bugs, which have been
added to this version of the changelog since their CVE ID was missing
in previous releases.
I believe you should edit the previous changelog entries to include those
bug
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
I believe you should edit the previous changelog entries to include those
bug numbers and CVE IDs, so users can easily locate the version that fixed
the bug. (There is nothing wrong with editing old changelog entries to fix
Hello,
There is now lots of confusion around Jetty. I though that we agreed
earlier with Torsten to use the package jetty6 for the new packaging,
and to remove the old jetty package.
So it looks like in the end the jetty package survives...
I'm pushing back quickly in SVN the fixes I made for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 540737 + confirmed
Bug #540737 [libantlr2.7-cil] libantlr2.7-cil: installation into Mono fails (no
strong name)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 543073 + patch confirmed
Bug #543073 [libjboss-aop-java] libjboss-aop-java: FTBFS: java errors
Added tag(s) confirmed and patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 543105 + confirmed
Bug #543105 [swing-layout] swing-layout: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler
Added tag(s) confirmed.
owner 543105 !
Bug #543105 [swing-layout] swing-layout: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler
Owner recorded as Niels
Re: Melhor convidar.
Esta é a sauda??o de Eiorder. LTD uma das grandes Elétrica atacadista e
varejista em China.We principalmente vender electrodomésticos produto, tais
como cameras digitais, celular, TV LCD, Xbox, Laptops, DV, Mp4, GPS, guitarra
elétrica. Visite nosso web site: www
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Andreas
Schildbachandr...@schildbach.de wrote:
I have just committed a fix to bug 543122. How am I going to get this to
sid? Will the process automatically kick in? Do I need to tag the
package in dpkg-java svn?
just ask for a sponsor. In this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 543073 + help
Bug #543073 [libjboss-aop-java] libjboss-aop-java: FTBFS: java errors
Added tag(s) help.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 543134 + help
Bug #543134 [libjboss-remoting-java] libjboss-remoting-java: FTBFS: Nonexistent
build-dependency: libtomcat5.5-java
Added tag(s) help.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Hi Andreas,
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Andreas
Schildbachandr...@schildbach.de wrote:
I am getting asked for a password, but my alioth password does not seem
to match.
please install your public ssh key: http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH.
Cheers,
Torsten
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 496461 port-forwarding not working
Bug #496461 [azureus] azureus: does not bind to tcp/udp4
Changed Bug title to 'port-forwarding not working' from 'azureus: does not bind
to tcp/udp4'
severity 496461 low
Severity level `low' is not
retitle 496461 port-forwarding not working
severity 496461 low
--
I've managed to test the current azureus release (4.2.0.4-1) in the
following environments with only ipv4 configured:
- public: NAT OK.
- gateway [CentOS iptables-shorewall]: NAT OK
- gateway [W2K3 ISA Server 2006]: NAT OK (had to
Hi,
I'm not aware of any kind of port forwarding on this box.
I assume iptables is not used at all, but I'm no expert so I don't know how to
check for any rule anywhere.
data:~# iptables -L
WARNING: All config files need .conf: /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-kernel-nkc, it
will
be ignored in a future
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 496461
Bug #496461 {Done: Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com} [azureus] azureus:
does not bind to tcp/udp4
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 542392 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #542392 [azureus] azureus: Refuses to start
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
severity 542392 important
Bug #542392 [azureus] azureus: Refuses to start
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 542162 normal
Bug #542162 [maven2] maven2: mvn command fail right after installing the package
Bug #542167 [maven2] mvn command fails right after installing the package
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
Severity set to 'normal' from
Adrian Perez wrote:
Hello everybody.
I won't point to you to the advantages of the DVCS such as git,
mercurial or bazaar here, i'm only willing to know if there is such an
initiative of migrating the team's repository to a distributed one.
I think that will work better and easier for us
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 416265 3.4.1-1
Bug #416265 {Done: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net} [eclipse] eclipse: cannot
download files from links in tutorial
There is no source info for the package 'eclipse' at version '3.4.1-1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a
What kind of port forwarding you're performing? iptables?
Could you please provide more information.
Binding to :: will comprise ipv4 too, AFAIK.
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 19:44 +0200, Achim Schaefer wrote:
which seems not allowed any more
to port 46949. now I can see only ipv6 ports open:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 529493 serious
Bug #529493 [libnsuml-java] libnsuml-java: Please remove build-dep on
jikes-kaffe
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
reopen
Sorry, but this is still the case for me, I don't know why.
I changed the port from a port above 5, which seems not allowed any more
to port 46949. now I can see only ipv6 ports open:
ac...@data:~$ netstat -an | grep 46949
tcp6 0 0 :::46949:::*
Omg look at what my friend is doing on cam take a look its
freewww.freakymatch.com/eDear pkgjavamaintainers! Get Yourself a cool, short
@in.com Email ID now!
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Thu Aug 13 22:02, Archive Administrator wrote:
Rejected: excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.dsc refers to
excalibur-logkit_2.0.orig.tar.gz, but I can't find it in the queue or in the
pool.
Whoops, needed to pass in -sa because of the old ubuntu revisions. Fixed
now
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 541126 + pending
Bug #541126 [libwagon-java] libwagon-java: dependency libmaven-scm-java not
found
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Hello Todd,
You will be more lucky working with Tomcat 6 which contains all the
goodies that you need to administer multiple Tomcat instances.
From the man page:
tomcat6-instance-create - creates a Tomcat6 instance
SYNOPSIS
tomcat6-instance-create [OPTIONS] DIRECTORYNAME
DESCRIPTION
Hey Ludovic,
That looks awesome-- thanks. I will try to convince my devs to upgrade :)
-Todd
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:41:51PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote:
Hello Todd,
You will be more lucky working with Tomcat 6 which contains all the
goodies that you need to administer multiple Tomcat
Hi,
I've prepared language pack for eclipse 3.4, eclipse-l10n package.
It includes below languages
- Arabic, Czech, Danish, German, Greek, Spanish, Finnish, French,
Hungarian, Italian, Hebrew, Japanese, Korean, Dutch, Norwegian, Polish,
Portuguese, Portuguese (Brazil), Russian,
Hi,
thanks for your comment.
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:24:41 +0200 (CEST)
Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org wrote:
But it has a problem - eclipse needs ulimit value change, reported as
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/293573 and
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:15:05 +0100, Ludovic Claude
ludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote:
Hello Damien,
Hi,
I'm sorry for missing that one, but I'm packaging stuff by the dozen...
It would be good if you add your bnd script to the package, that's one
thing I have left out for now.
I'll have a
Hi list,
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:53:01 +0200
Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
Now eclipse package is updated to 3.4, so I'll prepare -l10n packages
for 3.4. BTW, is it better that I would change its package name as
eclipse-l10n-japanese? (with no eclipse version)
I've put
Hello,
Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 11:08 +0100 schrieb Steffen Moeller:
Daniel Leidert wrote:
I'm wondering about the move of libjgrapht-java to contrib. In
README.Debian you say, that it doesn't build with gcj. I now tried to
build the software.
Version 0.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marco Rodrigues wrote:
I was hoping the java team could help to assign bugs that still apply to
tomcat6 and left the ones that doesn't, so I can massively close them.
I looked through them quickly and closed all that did not apply anymore.
There
Hi Ludovic,
Le dimanche 02 août 2009 02:50:45, Mini-Dinstall a écrit :
Package: bnd
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Ludovic Claude
ludovic.cla...@laposte.net
Architecture: source
Changes:
* Initial release. (Closes: #539558)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Torsten Werner wrote:
Hi Marco,
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Marco Rodriguesgoth...@sapo.pt wrote:
Can I close all bugs in 'tomcat5' package ?
only if they are specific to the old version. If they are affecting
tomcat6 too - you should
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Marco Rodriguesgoth...@sapo.pt wrote:
I don't know anything about java or tomcat :(
I am not a tomcat expert either.
I was hoping the java team could help to assign bugs that still apply to
tomcat6 and left the ones
that doesn't, so I can massively close
Hello Warun,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:08:26PM -0400, Varun Hiremath wrote:
I am having trouble uploading packages to pkg-java repository. The
error message (same as the 'mini-dinstall log notice (ERROR)' mailed
to group) that I get is attached to this mail. I am using the dput
template
1401 - 1500 of 2299 matches
Mail list logo
