Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 426761 !
Bug #426761 {Done: Javier Serrano Polo jas...@terra.es} [tomcat5.5]
tomcat5.5: don't include auto-generated policy
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Michael Kochkonque...@gmx.de wrote:
Torsten. can you please fix this?
Done. I hope it works now.
Cheers,
Torsten
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Marco,
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Marco Rodriguesgoth...@sapo.pt wrote:
Can I close all bugs in 'tomcat5' package ?
only if they are specific to the old version. If they are affecting
tomcat6 too - you should reassign them to the newer package.
Thanks,
Torsten
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:54:06 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
It seems that libspin-java could be moved to main. Reading changelog it was
put to contrib due to libcglib2.1-java be in contrib, but libcglib2.1-java
has
moved to main please move therefore to main.
Thanks for the reminder, and
Hi Damien,
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Damien
Raude-Morvandraz...@drazzib.com wrote:
I've used some hours of my spare time to fix #480132 aspectj: please upload
to main.
I can check it this evening after the Debconf9 daytrip.
Cheers,
Torsten
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:33:45PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
The discussion is probably over because jetty 6.1.19-1 has been
accepted into experimental. But we can still call the next major
version
Hi,
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:08:49 +0900
Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package name: eclipse-l10n-japanese-3.5.0
Now eclipse package is updated to 3.4,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 529005
Bug #529005 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com}
[libaccess-bridge-java-jni] missing symlink in package
Unarchived Bug 529005
reassign 529005 openjdk-6
Bug #529005 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com}
The discussion is probably over because jetty 6.1.19-1 has been
accepted into experimental. But we can still call the next major
version jetty7.
Cheers,
Torsten
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Well that's the way it is. I was too slow on this, busy with other things.
Jetty 7 is getting close to a release version and its API has changed
completely, so yes we'll need to use jetty7 as the package name.
Ludovic
Ludovic
Torsten Werner a écrit :
The discussion is probably over because
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:33:45PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
The discussion is probably over because jetty 6.1.19-1 has been
accepted into experimental. But we can still call the next major
version jetty7.
As long as jetty 6.x is not in unstable nothing is decided. Its still
possible to do
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 536205 + pending
Bug #536205 [libhttpunit-java] Please add Class-Path entry to the manifest
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 11:29:29AM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
as a first result from Debconf9 I am announcing the setup of an
inofficial package archive and upload queue. The details can be found
in the Debian wiki at http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/JavaPackaging.
I'll move my packages now from
I think that's a great news, as it would help the pkg-java team to
collaborate more on large and complex projects (Maven, Eclipse, any J2EE
server), plus those who live on the bleeding edge will get their daily
cup of fresh Java software.
The problem I have with the Debian NEW queue is that it
Forgot to CC bugs.
Ludovic Claude wrote:
Hi Niels,
This works for me:
#!/usr/bin/bsh
String a = Hello;
System.out.println(a);
Maybe you were missing the semi colon after Hello. You need also to
make your hello.bsh file executable
My test script:
cat hello.bsh EOF
#!/usr/bin/bsh
Ludovic Claude ludovic.cla...@laposte.net writes:
plus those who live on the bleeding edge will get their daily
cup of fresh Java software.
...sudden visceral image of a delicious steaming hot cup of coffee...
man, Java the language has its pros and cons, but it's very hard to
argue with the
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Torsten Wernertwer...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Thierry
Carrezthierry.car...@ubuntu.com wrote:
It also uses a different default port, by the way. My point is that the
packaging is different, the upstream product is a major rewrite
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 507089 jamvm
Bug#507089: infinite loop in File.canWrite()
Bug reassigned from package `classpath' to `jamvm'.
close 507089 1.5.1-1
Bug#507089: infinite loop in File.canWrite()
'close' is deprecated; see
Hello Thierry,
I have no preference between jetty and jetty6. I already renamed jetty6
to jetty after a suggestion from Marcus Better, I can reverse this
change easily.
With only 14 reported installations according to popcon stats, I don't
think that upgrade issues are that important.
Hello,
just to through my two cents into the ring...
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:21:45PM +0100, Ludovic Claude wrote:
Hello Thierry,
I have no preference between jetty and jetty6. I already renamed jetty6
to jetty after a suggestion from Marcus Better, I can reverse this
change easily.
jetty - mortbay jetty5 servlet-2.4 impl
jetty6 - mortbay jetty6 architectural change, done from scratch,
servlet-2.5 impl
jetty7 - eclipse jetty7 (servlet-2.5 impl)
jetty8 - eclipse jetty8 (servlet-3.0 impl)
If that naming convention is followed, any of them can co-exist on a
machine. (Eg
Hi Ludovic,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Ludovic
Claudeludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote:
That makes 2 people in favour of using 'jetty6' for the name of the
package for Jetty 6.x. Anybody wants to keep the name 'jetty'?
If I get one more vote on jetty6, I will rename my package.
I have no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 538063 jflex
Bug#538063: libjflex-java: Broken link installed in /usr/share/ant/lib
Warning: Unknown package 'libjflex-java'
Bug reassigned from package `libjflex-java' to `jflex'.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Thierry
Carrezthierry.car...@ubuntu.com wrote:
It also uses a different default port, by the way. My point is that the
packaging is different, the upstream product is a major rewrite version,
so it's clearly not the same thing.
Renaming the package to jetty6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 537290 classpath-common
Bug#537290: classpath-common,gcj-jdk: Conflicting file
/usr/share/man/man1/gappletviewer.1.gz
Bug reassigned from package `classpath-common, gcj-jdk' to `classpath-common'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Il 14/07/2009 19.03, Torsten Werner ha scritto:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Andrea
Zaglia.za...@comune.scandicci.fi.it wrote:
i don't know if the question is stupid but: with which compiler is tomcat
compiled? gcj or sun?
Tomcat6 is compiled with OpenJDK6. You can see that at
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Andrea
Zaglia.za...@comune.scandicci.fi.it wrote:
and also tomcat 5.5 in lenny? (for my ignorance, it isn't clear at
http://packages.debian.org/source/lenny/tomcat5.5)
No that has been built with gcj.
Cheers,
Torsten
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 536908 + pending
Bug#536908: maven-archiver: FTBFS:
/usr/share/maven-ant-helper/maven-build.xml:123:
/build/user-maven-archiver_2.3-2-amd64-a57k36/maven-archiver-2.3/debian/lib${package}-java.poms
doesn't exist
There were no tags set.
Tags
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 536978 1.0~alpha12-1
Bug#536978: plexus-archiver: FTBFS:
/usr/share/maven-ant-helper/maven-build.xml:123:
/build/user-plexus-archiver_1.0~alpha10-2-amd64-pD106n/plexus-archiver-1.0~alpha10/debian/lib${package}-java.poms
doesn't exist
Bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 537020 + pending
Bug#537020: doxia: FTBFS: Cannot find file /usr/share/java/plexus-build-api.jar
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
fixed 1.1-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 536982 2.3-1
Bug#536982: maven-clean-plugin: FTBFS:
/usr/share/maven-ant-helper/maven-build.xml:123:
/build/user-maven-clean-plugin_2.2-2-amd64-9737mW/maven-clean-plugin-2.2/debian/lib${package}-java.poms
doesn't exist
Bug marked as fixed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 536981 1.0.1-2
Bug#536981: modello: FTBFS: /usr/share/maven-ant-helper/maven-build.xml:123:
/build/user-modello_1.0-alpha-21-3-amd64-nHIkew/modello-1.0-alpha-21/modello-test/debian/libmodello-java.poms
doesn't exist
Bug marked as fixed in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 536948 1.1-final-2
Bug#536948: classworlds: FTBFS:
/build/user-classworlds_1.1-final-1-amd64-xWscOq/classworlds-1.1-final/debian/libclassworlds-java.poms
doesn't exist
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.1-final-2.
thanks
Stopping
Hi Andrea,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Andrea
Zaglia.za...@comune.scandicci.fi.it wrote:
i don't know if the question is stupid but: with which compiler is tomcat
compiled? gcj or sun?
Tomcat6 is compiled with OpenJDK6. You can see that at
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 533150 + help
Bug#533150: please do not depend on tomcat5.5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: help
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Should this not be merged with #507536
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507536 ?
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I must be doing something wrong, but I do not see what is wrong with
the following piece of code (*). Is there a restriction when using ecj
as the java compiler ?
The manpage for ecj indicates that it is building with
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
I must be doing something wrong, but I do not see what is wrong with
the following piece of code (*). Is there a restriction when using ecj
as the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
So my question: is it ok for package maintainer to use javac -source
1.5 to compile code or will there be some portability glitch (user is
alowed to set other java compiler).
It's certainly OK, even necessary in this case.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
So my question: is it ok for package maintainer to use javac -source
1.5 to compile code or will there be some portability glitch (user is
alowed to set other java compiler).
It's certainly OK,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Onkar Shinde wrote:
So my question: is it ok for package maintainer to use javac -source
1.5 to compile code
It's certainly OK, even necessary in this case.
Please make sure that the package dependencies reflect that the
package is built with
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Onkar Shindeonkarshi...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
So my question: is it ok for package maintainer to use javac -source
1.5 to compile code or will there be some portability
Hi,
Here is the patch to update the copyright files for the Apache Commons
packages:
- the full license text has been replaced by the reference to
/usr/share/common-licenses/
- Apache License 1.1 has been changed to 2.0 (except for Commons EL)
- the upstream authors/contributors have been
This is Stan Smith at MyOwnEzine.com. I want to thank you for requesting my
ezine/newsletter about email marketin.g, publishing your own ezine and building
your online business.
Because I have recently switched to Aweber to broadcast the ezine, I must ask
you to subscribe on my web page at:
Hi,
Anyone to apply the patch please?
Here is an updated version that doesn't conflict with the latest commits.
Emmanuel Bourg
Index: commons-beanutils/debian/copyright
===
--- commons-beanutils/debian/copyright (revision 8512)
Le mercredi 17 juin 2009 à 10:33 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
Hi,
Anyone to apply the patch please?
I am doing it.
Here is an updated version that doesn't conflict with the latest commits.
Thanks
Sylvestre
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing
Le mercredi 17 juin 2009 à 10:40 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
Le mercredi 17 juin 2009 à 10:33 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit :
Hi,
Anyone to apply the patch please?
I am doing it.
Done.
Here is what I have done:
* If the latest changelog entry is tagged as UNRELEASED, I just added
Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
Anyone to apply the patch please?
I am doing it.
Done.
Thanks!
Emmanuel Bourg
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Forwarded from -devel
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should
this package be orphaned?)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009
From: Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org
To: Jerry Haltom was...@larvalstage.net, Michael Koch konque
Project? Maybe
they have some resources they can spend on that?
Regards, Markus
2009/6/15 Andrew Vaughan ajv-li...@netspace.net.au
Forwarded from -devel
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse:
should this package
* Markus Knauer mkna...@innoopract.com [2009-06-15 06:21]:
Or did you contact one of the persons of the Linux Distro Project? Maybe they
have some resources they can spend on that?
Unfortunately, we do not (and we're now known as the Linux Tools Project
:) . However, we are working on making
Re: Melhor convidar.
Esta é a sauda??o de Eiorder. LTD uma das grandes Elétrica atacadista e
varejista em China.We principalmente vender electrodomésticos produto, tais
como cameras digitais, celular, TV LCD, Xbox, Laptops, DV, Mp4, GPS, guitarra
elétrica. Visite nosso web site: www,eiorder
Hi,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:20:04 +0300
Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually 3.5 should be out (in eclipse.org) real soon now :-)
The reason it is not in debian is that eclipse is notoriously hard to package
and the interested parties currently have no free time.
I'll
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I reviewed the files in SVN and build a patch to reflect
the change. I also updated the information about former Jakarta projects
that moved to their own top level project (Velocity and Struts)
Le vendredi 12 juin 2009 09:56:47, Marcus Better a écrit :
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I reviewed the files in SVN and build a patch to reflect
the change. I also updated the information about former Jakarta projects
that moved to their own top level project (Velocity and Struts)
Thanks a lot!
Damien Raude-Morvan a écrit :
It is obvious, but don't forget tu update debian/changelog (description +
credits to Emmanuel Bourg) as this patch doesn't include those files.
Thank you but don't bother with the attribution, this is a trivial change.
Emmanuel Bourg
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Emmanuel Bourgebo...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I noticed some inconsistencies in the copyright files of the Apache Commons
packages:
- Some packages still have the old Apache Software License 1.1, but they
have been released with the AL 2.0. It affects the
Onkar Shinde a écrit :
Is the new license applicable to the versions of these packages in
repository? If yes then a bug should be filed for every such package
with severity 'serious'.
If the new license is applicable to the versions not yet in repository
then someone needs to update the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
It is obvious, but don't forget tu update debian/changelog (description +
credits to Emmanuel Bourg) as this patch doesn't include those files.
I don't think this trivial change warrants a changelog entry. If you are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
I checked the packages, the upstream releases of the versions in the
repository are all licensed under the Apache License 2.0.
Ouch.
Is it necessary to file a bug of each package, or it is possible to file
only one bug
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:53:54 +0200, Marcus Better mar...@better.se wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
It is obvious, but don't forget tu update debian/changelog (description
+
credits to Emmanuel Bourg) as this patch doesn't include those files.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 532728 + unreproducible
Bug#532728: clojure: link fails when trying to use inspector
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi,
I have the suspicion that this is rather a bug in libaccess-bridge-java-jni than
in imagej because the library does not seem to be registered correctly. At
least
guessing from your workaround I can not see in how far this should be imagej
specific. Before I reassign the bug I would like
2009/6/4 Raphaël Vandon vand...@esiee.fr:
hello, I saw that the version of eclipse in the repository of debian
unstable is the 3.2, while the current version available on the official
site is the 3.4. Is there any reason for this ?
Actually 3.5 should be out (in eclipse.org) real soon now :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
2009/6/4 Raphaël Vandon vand...@esiee.fr:
hello, I saw that the version of eclipse in the repository of debian
unstable is the 3.2, while the current version available on the official
site is the 3.4. Is there any
Actually im on the way of repackage it (for my needs) , but im way not
a debian developer.
This is not a problem, I am not a DD either. We have at least one DD though
willing to help with sponsoring etc if the technical problems are solved.
What is the policy about eclipse plugins ? should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michal Vyskocil wrote:
I'm working on packaging of dom4j for SUSE, which is really difficult due
Sun's mess in licensing. Thanks to you and you dom4j package, which I
used.
You're welcome :-)
But our legal team is still not happy. Even if your
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Suhas K.P suhas@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Suhas K.P suhas@gmail.com
Date: Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:12 PM
Subject: Requesting For the Report Documentaion of The JFtp Project
To: va...@debian.org, aku...@debian.org
inline: Hoop.png___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Title: Meriter Total Wellness - #attributes.thetitle#
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 04:35:33PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote:
Files: ./accessories/to{x,}html.xsl ./accessories/marktree.js
Copyright: Miika Nurminen (minur...@cc.jyu.fi) 2003, 2004
License: Mozilla 1.1
The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version
1.1 (the
The package below is valued at over $2000 when purchased individually
Currently Practicing MDs in America
788,779 in total * 17,122 emails
Lots of MDs in specialties like Orthopedics, Surgery, Radiology, Dermatology,
Neurology, General Practice etc..
Over a dozen sortable fields
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 519235 + pending
Bug#519235: pdfsam: requires openjdk-6-jre, but works with sun-6-jre
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hello,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Torsten Werner mail.twer...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Petter,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
The number of commits seem to indicate it is not quite dead yet. I
hoped some of the other project admins would
Hello !
Dominik Smatana wrote:
currently I'm working on some Java related packages:
- png-sixlegs (new upstream release of existing package)
- yuicompressor (new package)
- freehep (new package)
I'd like to make them co-maintained by our team, can I import them
into SVN (/trunk)?
No
Hello,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org wrote:
Hello !
Dominik Smatana wrote:
currently I'm working on some Java related packages:
- png-sixlegs (new upstream release of existing package)
- yuicompressor (new package)
- freehep (new package)
I'd
On Mar 21, 2009 at 23:09, Marco Rodrigues praised the llamas by saying:
Hi!
Could someone look at tomcat5 bugs, to see if at least some of them applies to
5.5 or 6 ? After that I can close all the bugs from it.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=yessrc=tomcat5
Hello,
http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/ - is that project dead? I hope not :)
Any response is welcome, thanks.
Regards
Dominik Smatana
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dominik Smatana dominik.smat...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to join Debian Java Packaging Project team.
My Alioth
Hi Dominik,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Dominik Smatana
dominik.smat...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to join Debian Java Packaging Project team.
My Alioth account: dominik-guest
welcome! I have added you to the project.
Cheers,
Torsten
___
[Dominik Smatana]
Hello,
http://pkg-java.alioth.debian.org/ - is that project dead? I hope not :)
Any response is welcome, thanks.
The number of commits seem to indicate it is not quite dead yet. I
hoped some of the other project admins would add you, but will try to
get it done tomorrow
Hi Petter,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com wrote:
The number of commits seem to indicate it is not quite dead yet. I
hoped some of the other project admins would add you, but will try to
get it done tomorrow unless someone betas me to it.
I have added
Hi,
I haven't seen anybody answering, so I take a pick.
dominik.smat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've uploaded my very first package yesterday (simple Java library,
waiting for a sponsor now...) but I'm not sure it conforms all related
policies:
- http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
Hello,
thank you very much for answer and for tips, I appreciate it...
Regards
Dominik Smatana
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Eric Lavarde d...@zorglub.s.bawue.de wrote:
Hi,
I haven't seen anybody answering, so I take a pick.
dominik.smat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've uploaded my
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Hi.
debian/copyright misses a note about:
./build/src/org/jibx/binding/ant/CompileTask.java:Copyright (c) 2003, Andrew
J. Glover
also I'm confused because ./docs/jibx-license.html mentions other code that
is included
under differing licenses but I wasn't able
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Leidert wrote:
Hope you are well!
I should be doing other things than caring about libjgrapht these days, but I
am fine,
thanks - so are you, I hope.
Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 11:08 +0100 schrieb Steffen Moeller:
Daniel Leidert wrote:
I'm wondering about the move of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 519235 wishlist
Bug#519235: pdfsam: requires openjdk-6-jre, but works with sun-6-jre
Severity set to `wishlist' from `important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Hi Steffen,
Hope you are well!
Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 11:08 +0100 schrieb Steffen Moeller:
Daniel Leidert wrote:
I'm wondering about the move of libjgrapht-java to contrib. In
README.Debian you say, that it doesn't build with gcj. I now tried to
build the software.
Version 0.6
Hi Miguel,
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc wrote:
I would like to join pkg-java. I'm already sent a RFS for httpunit package
to debian-mentors asking for review.
what is your account name on alioth? The package looks good at a first glance.
Cheers,
Torsten
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Torsten Werner
mail.twer...@googlemail.com wrote:
what is your account name on alioth? The package looks good at a first glance.
My account name on alioth is nomadium-guest.
Regards,
--
Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc
secure email with PGP 0xBBAE1769
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc wrote:
My account name on alioth is nomadium-guest.
I've added you to the project. Please let us know when you have added
httpunit to the svn repo. I'll sponsor the upload.
Cheers,
Torsten
Hi Francesco,
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:12 PM, francesco postadelm...@gmail.com wrote:
It is possible have a newer version on Debian ? maybe in experimental ?
I do not know what the actual problem with updating eclipse is but one
of the major problems of Java in Debian is the small number of
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Torsten Werner
mail.twer...@googlemail.com wrote:
I've added you to the project. Please let us know when you have added
httpunit to the svn repo. I'll sponsor the upload.
Thanks,
I already added httpunit package to the svn repo.
Thanks for your sponsoring!
Am Donnerstag 05 März 2009 14:30:04 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System:
Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 23:08 +0100 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
using saxon to create manpages from docbook files is VERY slow in
comparison to xsltproc.
Additionally, the results don't match as the locally installed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 451258
Bug#451258: fop: footnote inside varlistentry is not rendered in PDF output
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
As the subject says: libjgrapht-java is from contrib,
It does indeed seem to be in contrib in squeeze and sid while in etch and lenny
it is in main.
The changelog for the one new version since lenny makes no mention of the move
to contrib.
Can anyone explain why it was moved to contrib?
Marcus Better wrote:
Also, the upgrade path would still be broken.
I fail to see the problem, could you detail it a bit?
This is what happens:
First, install from Lenny:
# apt-get install solr-tomcat5.5/stable
# ls -l /etc/tomcat5.5/policy.d/05solr.policy* /etc/solr/tomcat.policy
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Daniel Leidert
daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net wrote:
I would like to join pkg-java.
what is your account name on alioth.debian.org?
Cheers,
Torsten
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
Am Montag, den 23.02.2009, 23:37 +0100 schrieb Torsten Werner:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Daniel Leidert
daniel.leidert.s...@gmx.net wrote:
I would like to join pkg-java.
what is your account name on alioth.debian.org?
dleidert-guest
Regards, Daniel
Archive Administrator wrote:
GnuPG signature check failed on libjibx-java_1.0.2-1_i386.changes
gpg: Signature made Sun Feb 22 12:37:40 2009 UTC using DSA key ID 869D2871
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
(Exit status 2)
/libjibx-java_1.0.2-1_i386.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG
Hello,
Debian Installer wrote:
Rejected: md5sum for
/srv/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/f/fop/fop_0.95.dfsg.orig.tar.gz doesn't
match fop_0.95.dfsg-3.dsc.
Rejected: size for
/srv/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/f/fop/fop_0.95.dfsg.orig.tar.gz doesn't
match fop_0.95.dfsg-3.dsc.
Rejected:
1501 - 1600 of 2299 matches
Mail list logo
