On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Debian Installer wrote:
(new) icu4j_3.8.1-1.diff.gz optional devel
(new) icu4j_3.8.1-1.dsc optional devel
(new) icu4j_3.8.1.orig.tar.gz optional devel
(new) libicu4j-java_3.8.1-1_all.deb optional devel
OOC, why icu4j 3.8.1 and not directly 4.0.0?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: icu4j_3.8.1-1_i386.changes is NEW
To: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Rene
* Andreas Tille til...@rki.de [2008-12-16 05:32]:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
So we should find out the latest version number of icu4j that would be
usable for Eclipse. I rewrote the watch file to detect any new version
even if a major version change happened (which was
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
So we should find out the latest version number of icu4j that would be
usable for Eclipse. I rewrote the watch file to detect any new version
even if a major version change happened (which was not the case before)
- but I have to relay on
Hi,
Debian Installer wrote:
(new) icu4j_3.8.1-1.diff.gz optional devel
(new) icu4j_3.8.1-1.dsc optional devel
(new) icu4j_3.8.1.orig.tar.gz optional devel
(new) libicu4j-java_3.8.1-1_all.deb optional devel
OOC, why icu4j 3.8.1 and not directly 4.0.0?
Regrds,
Rene
5 matches
Mail list logo