Bug#329325: libgef-java: Please use 'kaffe'

Package: libgef-java Version: 0.11.1-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Please use 'kaffe' to build the package. It seems to build fine with 'kaffe'. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/libgef-java-0.11.1/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/libgef-java-0.11.1/debian/control

Angebot

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, unser Sonderangebot ist an alle , die neue Klienten gewinnen möchten, schnell und preisgünstig den Kundenkreis erweitern sowie erfolgreiche Werbeaktionen durchführen wollen, gerichtet !!! Wir bieten Ihnen Datenbanken mit E-Mail-Adressen nicht nur deutscher

Processing of libgef-java_0.11.1-2_powerpc.changes

libgef-java_0.11.1-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libgef-java_0.11.1-2.dsc libgef-java_0.11.1.orig.tar.gz libgef-java_0.11.1-2.diff.gz libgef-java_0.11.1-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

libgef-java_0.11.1-2_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Warning: ignoring libgef-java_0.11.1.orig.tar.gz, since it's already in the archive. Accepted: libgef-java_0.11.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgef-java/libgef-java_0.11.1-2.diff.gz libgef-java_0.11.1-2.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgef-java/libgef-java_0.11.1-2.dsc libgef-java_0.11.1-2_all.deb

Bug#329245: Minor RFC 2109 / 2965 violation

Bug is fixed in trunk. The next release that will contain the fix is 3.0-RC4 and the nightly build 20050921. Cheers Ortwin Glück ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#321853: marked as done (libgef-java: typo in Description field)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:47:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321853: fixed in libgef-java 0.11.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#329325: marked as done (libgef-java: Please use 'kaffe')

Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:47:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329325: fixed in libgef-java 0.11.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processing of jcifs_1.2.3-1_powerpc.changes

jcifs_1.2.3-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jcifs_1.2.3-1.dsc jcifs_1.2.3.orig.tar.gz jcifs_1.2.3-1.diff.gz libjcifs-java_1.2.3-1_all.deb libjcifs-java-doc_1.2.3-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

jcifs_1.2.3-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: jcifs_1.2.3-1.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jcifs/jcifs_1.2.3-1.diff.gz jcifs_1.2.3-1.dsc to pool/main/j/jcifs/jcifs_1.2.3-1.dsc jcifs_1.2.3.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/j/jcifs/jcifs_1.2.3.orig.tar.gz libjcifs-java-doc_1.2.3-1_all.deb to pool/main/j/jcifs/libjcifs-java-doc_1.2.3-1_all.deb

Processing of libapache-mod-jk_1.2.14.1-1_powerpc.changes

libapache-mod-jk_1.2.14.1-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libapache-mod-jk_1.2.14.1-1.dsc libapache-mod-jk_1.2.14.1.orig.tar.gz libapache-mod-jk_1.2.14.1-1.diff.gz libapache-mod-jk-doc_1.2.14.1-1_all.deb libapache-mod-jk_1.2.14.1-1_powerpc.deb

Bug#272295: Unit test failure for org.apache.analysis.ru.RussianStem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The latest update on building Lucene with kaffe is that all of the code compiles, and all but one unit test passes. As mentioned previously, it is the unit test for org.apache.analysis.ru.RussianStem. I patched the Ant build file in our package

libapache-mod-jk_1.2.14.1-1_powerpc.changes is NEW

(new) libapache-mod-jk-doc_1.2.14.1-1_all.deb optional doc Documentation of libapache-mod-jk/libapache2-mod-jk packages Documentation and examples of the Apache jk connector for the Tomcat Java servlet engine. . For uptodate documentation about Tomcat connectors please take a look at the home

Processing of libjdom1-java_1.0-2_powerpc.changes

libjdom1-java_1.0-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libjdom1-java_1.0-2.dsc libjdom1-java_1.0-2.diff.gz libjdom1-java_1.0-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers

Aumente os seus Rendimentos !!!

O Maior sistema de trabalho a partir de casa está em grande expansão. Trabalhe em Part-time ou Full-Time. Ganhe 1000€ a 2500€. Para mais informações visite: www.trabalho-em-casa.tem-pc.com Ricardo Mateus Tel. 91 877 37 53 / 96 182 13 57 email. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Esta

Tomcat5 packages

I am grateful to see the tomcat5 packages appear and am wondering why 5.0 is being packaged instead of 5.5? I would like to use 5.5 even though it requires a non-free JVM (I'm presuming that's one of the reasons, perhaps 5.0 can be built and run with gjc/kaffe?) Thank you, Joel Johnson

ant_1.6.5-2_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: ant-doc_1.6.5-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/ant/ant-doc_1.6.5-2_all.deb ant-optional_1.6.5-2_all.deb to pool/main/a/ant/ant-optional_1.6.5-2_all.deb ant_1.6.5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/a/ant/ant_1.6.5-2.diff.gz ant_1.6.5-2.dsc to pool/main/a/ant/ant_1.6.5-2.dsc ant_1.6.5-2_all.deb to

Bug#291157: marked as done (ant: is JAVA_HOME really necessary for JDK functionality?)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:34:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#291157: fixed in ant 1.6.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#324884: marked as done (ant fails to recognize 'gjdoc' task, whereas libant1.6 succeeds.)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:34:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#324884: fixed in ant 1.6.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your