Hi,
I think this is a duplicate of #359979, found here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359979
Wouldn't it be possible, at least, some kind of NMU? It isn't hard at all to
fix...
Regards,
Rafael Rodríguez
___
pkg-java-maintainers
As you can see in the provided link, it's just a missing dependency...
Rafael Rodríguez
El Lunes, 24 de Abril de 2006 10:05, Stephan Michels escribió:
2006/4/24, Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think this is a duplicate of #359979, found here:
2006/4/24, Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think this is a duplicate of #359979, found here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359979
Wouldn't it be possible, at least, some kind of NMU? It isn't hard at all to
fix...
I'll will look later at that issue today or next
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Barry Hawkins wrote:
Daniel wrote:
Passing --extrapackages jikes on the pbuilder command
line allows the package to build; but I would suggest
that you allow ant to use its default of ecj-bootstrap
instead of adding jikes to the Build-Depends, if
2006/4/24, Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
As you can see in the provided link, it's just a missing dependency...
I just asked Matthias. And he said, that it is already fixed. So, I
will see if I can do an upload. The problem is that we have to handle
also the transition to gcj-4.1
Stephan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I'm ok with changing the name to
libpostgresql-jdbc-java
Comments?
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-1.dsc
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9.orig.tar.gz
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-1.diff.gz
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/libs/libstruts1.2-java/libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-1.diff.gz
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-1.dsc
to pool/main/libs/libstruts1.2-java/libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-1.dsc
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-1_all.deb
to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 05:47:09 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#360551: fixed in libstruts1.2-java 1.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
building the package libpgjava in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
[...]
[javac] --
[javac] 46. ERROR in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I did not upload the package with the changes, I'm waiting for some
comments about dropping the jdbc2 driver for postgresql.
Cheers,
PS: See #358345 for reference.
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Author: avdyk
Date: 2006-04-24 16:23:21 + (Mon, 24 Apr
libcommons-lang-java_2.1-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libcommons-lang-java_2.1-1.dsc
libcommons-lang-java_2.1.orig.tar.gz
libcommons-lang-java_2.1-1.diff.gz
libcommons-lang-java_2.1-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
libgetopt-java_1.0.11-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libgetopt-java_1.0.11-2.dsc
libgetopt-java_1.0.11-2.diff.gz
libgetopt-java_1.0.11-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
___
libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-5.dsc
libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-5.diff.gz
libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
liblogkit-java_1.2.2-8_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
liblogkit-java_1.2.2-8.dsc
liblogkit-java_1.2.2-8.diff.gz
liblogkit-java_1.2.2-8_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
___
reassign 344986 gij-4.0
retitle 344986 gjdoc: FTBFS on mips/mipsel: gij-wrapper-4.0 failed
thanks
From the config.log:
configure:20330: checking if /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.0 works
configure:20363: CLASSPATH=.: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.0 Test
Exception in thread main java.lang.NullPointerException
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 344986 gij-4.0
Bug#344986: gjdoc: FTBFS on several architectures (/usr/bin/gij-wrapper-4.0
failed)
Bug reassigned from package `gjdoc' to `gij-4.0'.
retitle 344986 gjdoc: FTBFS on mips/mipsel: gij-wrapper-4.0 failed
Bug#344986: gjdoc: FTBFS
libjdom-java_0.99.b10-6_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libjdom-java_0.99.b10-6.dsc
libjdom-java_0.99.b10-6.diff.gz
libjdom-java_0.99.b10-6_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
___
Accepted:
libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-5.diff.gz
to
pool/main/libc/libcommons-logging-java/libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-5.diff.gz
libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-5.dsc
to pool/main/libc/libcommons-logging-java/libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-5.dsc
libcommons-logging-java_1.0.4-5_all.deb
to
Accepted:
liblogkit-java_1.2.2-8.diff.gz
to pool/main/libl/liblogkit-java/liblogkit-java_1.2.2-8.diff.gz
liblogkit-java_1.2.2-8.dsc
to pool/main/libl/liblogkit-java/liblogkit-java_1.2.2-8.dsc
liblogkit-java_1.2.2-8_all.deb
to pool/main/libl/liblogkit-java/liblogkit-java_1.2.2-8_all.deb
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:18:57 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#352988: fixed in liblogkit-java 1.2.2-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:18:42 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#352985: fixed in libcommons-logging-java 1.0.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:18:47 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#352986: fixed in libgetopt-java 1.0.11-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Accepted:
liboro-java_2.0.8a-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/libo/liboro-java/liboro-java_2.0.8a-1.diff.gz
liboro-java_2.0.8a-1.dsc
to pool/main/libo/liboro-java/liboro-java_2.0.8a-1.dsc
liboro-java_2.0.8a-1_all.deb
to pool/main/libo/liboro-java/liboro-java_2.0.8a-1_all.deb
Accepted:
libpg-java_8.1-405-1_all.deb
to pool/main/libp/libpgjava/libpg-java_8.1-405-1_all.deb
libpgjava_8.1-405-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/libp/libpgjava/libpgjava_8.1-405-1.diff.gz
libpgjava_8.1-405-1.dsc
to pool/main/libp/libpgjava/libpgjava_8.1-405-1.dsc
libpgjava_8.1-405-1_all.deb
to
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:32:24 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#352989: fixed in liboro-java 2.0.8a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:32:27 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#358345: fixed in libpgjava 8.1-405-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
I did not upload the package with the changes, I'm waiting for some
comments about dropping the jdbc2 driver for postgresql.
I decided to upload, but I still can revert if someone *really* needs jdbc2.
- --
.''`.
: :'
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:32:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#350091: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:32:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#357427: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:32:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338938: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:32:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#351666: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:32:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#304927: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:32:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#351053: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:32:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#255418: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:32:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334012: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:32:15 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#328760: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
37 matches
Mail list logo