Re: Bug#382995: ITP: nekohtml -- HTML parser for Java

2006-08-15 Thread Marcus Better
Hello, can you please add me to the project so that I can put this package in the svn repository. Thanks, Marcus ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Bug#382995: ITP: nekohtml -- HTML parser for Java

2006-08-15 Thread Stefan Gybas
Marcus Better wrote: can you please add me to the project so that I can put this package in the svn repository. I've added you to the project. Welcome and have fun! :-) Stefan ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Re: Bug#382995: ITP: nekohtml -- HTML parser for Java

2006-08-15 Thread Marcus Better
Stefan Gybas wrote: I've added you to the project. Welcome and have fun! :-) Thanks! I have a few questions about the SVN policies. Why am I not allowed to check in the whole upstream source tree? Are we concerned about disk space? I need to repack the upstream sources to remove jar files etc,

Re: Bug#382995: ITP: nekohtml -- HTML parser for Java

2006-08-15 Thread Marcus Better
Robert Schuster wrote: first: I think this discussion fits better on the debian-java list. :) Why? It's about specific policies listed on the pkg-java web pages. As far as I understood it you should do the 'repackaging' programmatically. Put every needed operation to make the upstream

Processing of java-package_0.28_i386.changes

2006-08-15 Thread Archive Administrator
java-package_0.28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-package_0.28.dsc java-package_0.28.tar.gz java-package_0.28_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Bug#338277: marked as done (plugin doesn't work with IBM JRE 1.4)

2006-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:17:50 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338569: fixed in java-package 0.28 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#341751: marked as done (java-package: installs incorrect (non-existant) java plugin for ibm java 5.0)

2006-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:17:50 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#341751: fixed in java-package 0.28 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#342623: marked as done (java-package: errors if J2SE_PACKAGE_FULL_NAME contains spaces)

2006-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:17:50 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#342623: fixed in java-package 0.28 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#338569: marked as done (java-package: can't run java programs via two symlinks -)

2006-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:17:50 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#338569: fixed in java-package 0.28 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#345775: marked as done (java-package detects wrong version for IBM JDK 5.0 on AMD64)

2006-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:17:50 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#345775: fixed in java-package 0.28 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#376336: marked as done (kaffe: Unable to run any programs)

2006-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:32:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#376336: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#369877: marked as done (kaffe FTBFS on ia64 )

2006-08-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:32:11 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#369877: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.7-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now