Package: fop
Version: 1:0.95.dfsg-11
Severity: normal
Just a reminder, fop 1.0 is out. I will try to get it package ASAP.
-Mathieu
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (200, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
The 1.0 release is not mentioned at [1]. So I assume it is not final yet.
By the way, when you work on the package you may want to check/fix
some of the existing bugs.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566484
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575411
I'm looking at svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-java/trunk/commons-daemon (while
working on a private fix for bug #578661) and noticed a few problems
specifically with r10449:
1) The changes made in r8513 were reverted for no obvious reason.
In particular, the debian/watch file is still/again specifying
-- Forwarded message --
From: Simon Pepping
Date: Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:29 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release files for fop 1.0
To:
The release files for fop 1.0 are now ready for review and the release
vote.
The release files were built from:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Forwarding to debian-j...@l.d.o, which is our discussion list.
On 2010-07-13 12:45, Sergio Gelato wrote:
I'm looking at svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-java/trunk/commons-daemon (while
working on a private fix for bug #578661) and noticed a few
Accepted:
libgpars-groovy-java-doc_0.10-1_all.deb
to main/libg/libgpars-groovy-java/libgpars-groovy-java-doc_0.10-1_all.deb
libgpars-groovy-java_0.10-1.debian.tar.gz
to main/libg/libgpars-groovy-java/libgpars-groovy-java_0.10-1.debian.tar.gz
libgpars-groovy-java_0.10-1.dsc
to
Your message dated
with message-id 20100713165142.5775.91794.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org
and subject line classpath removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #211458,
regarding classpath: provide static libraries
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated
with message-id 20100713165142.5775.91794.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org
and subject line classpath removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #298857,
regarding A devhelp-book-java2 package would be useful
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated
with message-id 20100713165142.5775.91794.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org
and subject line classpath removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #341818,
regarding gcjwebplugin: Login applet on http://merkurwebbank.dk/ throws error
Your message dated
with message-id 20100713165142.5775.91794.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org
and subject line classpath removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #351551,
regarding cacao: reader.readLine() returns null while reader.ready() returns
true
to be marked as done.
Your message dated
with message-id 20100713165142.5775.91794.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org
and subject line classpath removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #387302,
regarding classpath-qtpeer: Qt peers fail to run Jmol
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated
with message-id 20100713165142.5775.91794.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org
and subject line classpath removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #413295,
regarding classpath: menus missing in Swing applications
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated
with message-id 20100713165142.5775.91794.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org
and subject line classpath removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #483919,
regarding classpath-qtpeer: Classpath AWT support still royally broken
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated
with message-id 20100713184534.10815.32513.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org
and subject line gjdoc removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #462292,
regarding gjdoc: fails to upgrade/remove/install when /proc is not mounted
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated
with message-id 20100713184534.10815.32513.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org
and subject line gjdoc removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #443039,
regarding gjdoc: doesnt fail gracefully when unable to fetch doc from the web
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated
with message-id 20100713184534.10815.32513.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org
and subject line gjdoc removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #514745,
regarding Updating the gjdoc Uploaders list
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Author: twerner
Date: 2010-07-14 05:31:34 + (Wed, 14 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 12748
Modified:
trunk/commons-daemon/debian/changelog
trunk/commons-daemon/debian/control
trunk/commons-daemon/debian/copyright
trunk/commons-daemon/debian/watch
Log:
* Re-add changes made Emmanuel Bourg:
Hi Sergio,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Sergio Gelato
sergio.gel...@astro.su.se wrote:
1) The changes made in r8513 were reverted for no obvious reason.
thanks for spotting this. I have merged that change again and committed it svn.
While I'm at it: how would the maintainers feel about
Author: twerner
Date: 2010-07-14 05:34:26 + (Wed, 14 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 12749
Modified:
trunk/commons-daemon/debian/changelog
Log:
rephrase changelog
Modified: trunk/commons-daemon/debian/changelog
===
---
19 matches
Mail list logo
