Bug#594719: fop: must depend on libxmlgraphics-commons-java 1.4 or above

2010-09-12 Thread Vincent Fourmond
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote: Le samedi 28 août 2010 à 17:08 +, brian m. carlson a écrit : fop 1.0 uses the class org.apache.xmlgraphics.util.uri.CommonURIResolver, which is only found in libxmlgraphics-commons-java 1.4 or above.  Otherwise

fop_1.0.dfsg-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED into ['experimental']

2010-09-12 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: fop-doc_1.0.dfsg-3_all.deb to main/f/fop/fop-doc_1.0.dfsg-3_all.deb fop_1.0.dfsg-3.debian.tar.gz to main/f/fop/fop_1.0.dfsg-3.debian.tar.gz fop_1.0.dfsg-3.dsc to main/f/fop/fop_1.0.dfsg-3.dsc fop_1.0.dfsg-3_all.deb to main/f/fop/fop_1.0.dfsg-3_all.deb Override entries for

Bug#451258: marked as done (fop: footnote inside varlistentry is not rendered in PDF output)

2010-09-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:47:19 + with message-id e1oul1j-0004np...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#451258: fixed in fop 1:1.0.dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #451258, regarding fop: footnote inside varlistentry is not rendered in PDF output to be marked as done.

Bug#594719: marked as done (fop: must depend on libxmlgraphics-commons-java 1.4 or above)

2010-09-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:47:19 + with message-id e1oul1j-0004nz...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#594719: fixed in fop 1:1.0.dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #594719, regarding fop: must depend on libxmlgraphics-commons-java 1.4 or above to be marked as done. This

Bug#589624: marked as done (fop-0.95 has a race condition in using ICC_Profile from java awt)

2010-09-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:47:19 + with message-id e1oul1j-0004nv...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#589624: fixed in fop 1:1.0.dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #589624, regarding fop-0.95 has a race condition in using ICC_Profile from java awt to be marked as done.

[pkg-java] r12977 - trunk/libjlatexmath-java/debian

2010-09-12 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Author: sylvestre Date: 2010-09-12 11:55:34 + (Sun, 12 Sep 2010) New Revision: 12977 Modified: trunk/libjlatexmath-java/debian/changelog trunk/libjlatexmath-java/debian/control trunk/libjlatexmath-java/debian/rules Log: In experimental * New upstream release * Standards-Version

Processing of libjlatexmath-java_0.9.3-1_i386.changes

2010-09-12 Thread Archive Administrator
libjlatexmath-java_0.9.3-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libjlatexmath-java_0.9.3-1.dsc libjlatexmath-java_0.9.3.orig.tar.gz libjlatexmath-java_0.9.3-1.diff.gz libjlatexmath-java_0.9.3-1_all.deb libjlatexmath-java-doc_0.9.3-1_all.deb

libjlatexmath-java_0.9.3-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into ['experimental']

2010-09-12 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: libjlatexmath-fop-java_0.9.3-1_all.deb to main/libj/libjlatexmath-java/libjlatexmath-fop-java_0.9.3-1_all.deb libjlatexmath-java-doc_0.9.3-1_all.deb to main/libj/libjlatexmath-java/libjlatexmath-java-doc_0.9.3-1_all.deb libjlatexmath-java_0.9.3-1.diff.gz to

Processing of libjgraphx-java_1.4.0.2-1_i386.changes

2010-09-12 Thread Archive Administrator
libjgraphx-java_1.4.0.2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libjgraphx-java_1.4.0.2-1.dsc libjgraphx-java_1.4.0.2.orig.tar.gz libjgraphx-java_1.4.0.2-1.diff.gz libjgraphx-java_1.4.0.2-1_all.deb libjgraphx-java-doc_1.4.0.2-1_all.deb Greetings,

libjgraphx-java_1.4.0.2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into ['experimental']

2010-09-12 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: libjgraphx-java-doc_1.4.0.2-1_all.deb to main/libj/libjgraphx-java/libjgraphx-java-doc_1.4.0.2-1_all.deb libjgraphx-java_1.4.0.2-1.diff.gz to main/libj/libjgraphx-java/libjgraphx-java_1.4.0.2-1.diff.gz libjgraphx-java_1.4.0.2-1.dsc to

Bug#595869: antlr3: FTBFS in squeeze: maven errors

2010-09-12 Thread Miguel Landaeta
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:01:57PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: actually it does not fix any problem for me because I have no problem. :) But feel free to merge your changes in the svn trunk. Looking more closely at this, I also could not reproduce this problem, so by the moment I am not