Bug#351076: ant: Java illegalAccess exception with the kaffee compiled version

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FROHNER Akos wrote: Hi Wolfgang, On Thu, 2006-02-02 18:06:34 +0100, Wolfgang Baer wrote: Frohner Akos wrote: The example build.xml file reports the following error with 1.6.5-4, 1.6.5-5, but worked up to 1.6.5-3 (explicitly checked with

Bug#350100: eclipse: cvs access using extssh doesn't work

On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 04:10:22PM +0100, Merwan wrote: Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.1-8 Followup-For: Bug #350100 When adding a new cvs repository, there's a message error 'Error validating location ' Just as above, using command line CVS access or ext connection type works well.

Bug#351076: ant: Java illegalAccess exception with the kaffee compiled version

On Tue, 2006-02-07 09:56:16 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/10/02/debian/pool/main/a/ant/ Thanks! 1.6.2-2 works 1.6.5-3 works 1.6.5-4 fails: build.xml:7: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access field

Bug#351076: ant: Java illegalAccess exception with the kaffee compiled version

Hi, FROHNER Akos wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-07 09:56:16 +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: http://snapshot.debian.net/archive/2005/10/02/debian/pool/main/a/ant/ Thanks! 1.6.2-2 works 1.6.5-3 works Build with jikes 1.6.5-4 fails: build.xml:7: java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to

Processing of cacao_0.94-2_i386.changes

cacao_0.94-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cacao_0.94-2.dsc cacao_0.94-2.diff.gz cacao_0.94-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

cacao_0.94-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cacao_0.94-2.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.94-2.diff.gz cacao_0.94-2.dsc to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.94-2.dsc cacao_0.94-2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.94-2_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 350729 Thank you for your

Bug#350729: marked as done (cacao: Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86 (regression))

Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 05:17:08 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#350729: fixed in cacao 0.94-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#350475: eclipse-platform-common: Desktop entry is missing

tag 350475 confirmed pending thanks On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 09:51:00PM +0100, Jerome Marant wrote: Package: eclipse-platform-common Version: 3.1.1-8 Severity: normal Hi, /usr/share/applications/eclipse.desktop seems to be missing, so there isn't any entry in KDE Application;Development

Processed: Re: Bug#348584: eclipse-jdt: Won't start without 'eclipse' package

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 348584 confirmed pending Bug#348584: eclipse-jdt: Won't start without 'eclipse' package There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed, pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: eclipse-jdt: Won't start without 'eclipse' package

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 348584 + pending Bug#348584: eclipse-jdt: Won't start without 'eclipse' package Tags were: pending confirmed Tags added: pending stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#351163: eclipse: icon in the menu vanished

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 351163 pending confirmed Bug#351163: eclipse: icon in the menu vanished There were no tags set. Tags added: pending, confirmed thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#351729: (no subject)

retitle 351729 libswt-pi-gtk-3139.so cannot be mapped and refuses Eclipse to start thanks Give the bug report a real title. Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/

Bug#351163: eclipse: icon in the menu vanished

tags 351163 pending confirmed thanks On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 11:03:24PM +0100, Armin Berres wrote: Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.1-8 Severity: minor Some weeks ago there was an eclipse update which was broken (I'm sure you remember). With this update the menu Icon for Eclipse in

Processed: Re: Bug#351729: (no subject)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 351729 libswt-pi-gtk-3139.so cannot be mapped and refuses Eclipse to start Bug#351729: (no subject) Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#350100: eclipse: cvs access using extssh doesn't work

tag 350100 confirmed retitle 350100 [classpath-specific] eclipse: cvs access using extssh doesn't work thanks On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:55:27AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 04:10:22PM +0100, Merwan wrote: Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.1-8 Followup-For: Bug #350100

Processed: Re: Bug#350100: eclipse: cvs access using extssh doesn't work

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 350100 confirmed Bug#350100: eclipse bug There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed retitle 350100 [classpath-specific] eclipse: cvs access using extssh doesn't work Bug#350100: eclipse bug Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing

Bug#348139: marked as done (java-package: in postinst script the function program_alternative() misuse update-alternative)

Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:57:00 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348139: java-package use of update-alternatives has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#281766: Is the current behavior of java-package sufficient to close this bug?

tags 281766 moreinfo stop Is the current functionality of java-package and its use of dpkg-architecture sufficient to close this bug? Thanks, -- Barry Hawkins All Things Computed site: www.alltc.com weblog: www.yepthatsme.com Registered Linux User #368650 signature.asc Description: This is

Processed: Non-reproducible; no feedback in almost one year, closing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 300546 unreproducible Bug#300546: java-package does not build jdk-1_5_0_02-linux-i586.bin Update 2 for SUN 1.5 There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Processed: Condition not reproducible; no info received, closing

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 341495 unreproducible Bug#341495: java-package: dpkg -i incomplete install Tags were: moreinfo Tags added: unreproducible stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Is the current behavior of java-package sufficient to close this bug?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 281766 moreinfo Bug#281766: missing gcc makes dpkg-architecture print spurious warnings Tags were: confirmed Tags added: moreinfo stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: parsing java -version is more brittle than the current solution

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 288986 wontfix Bug#288986: make-jpkg could determine version of Java from 'java -version' There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#300546: marked as done (java-package does not build jdk-1_5_0_02-linux-i586.bin Update 2 for SUN 1.5)

Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:03:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Non-reproducible; no feedback in almost one year, closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#288986: marked as done (make-jpkg could determine version of Java from 'java -version')

Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:20:21 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line parsing java -version is more brittle than the current solution has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#341495: marked as done (java-package: dpkg -i incomplete install)

Your message dated Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:08:04 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Condition not reproducible; no info received, closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the