Processing of cacao_0.98-1_source.changes

2007-06-27 Thread Archive Administrator
cacao_0.98-1_source.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG Removing cacao_0.98-1_source.changes, but keeping its associated files for now. Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Processing of cacao_0.98-1_i386.changes

2007-06-27 Thread Archive Administrator
cacao_0.98-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cacao_0.98-1.dsc cacao_0.98.orig.tar.gz cacao_0.98-1.diff.gz cacao_0.98-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing

cacao_0.98-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-27 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cacao_0.98-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.98-1.diff.gz cacao_0.98-1.dsc to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.98-1.dsc cacao_0.98-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.98-1_i386.deb cacao_0.98.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cacao/cacao_0.98.orig.tar.gz Override entries for your

Bug#396699: marked as done (cacao: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD)

2007-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:47:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#396699: fixed in cacao 0.98-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#428600: marked as done (cacao: new upstream release)

2007-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:47:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#428600: fixed in cacao 0.98-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: Is java-package dead?

2007-06-27 Thread Michael Koch
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:08:44AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: I just noticed there's not been any updates to java-package either in Debian or the svn tree, since late last year. Meanwhile, bugs are accumulating in the BTS, and neither the current IBM Java 5 release nor Java 6

Bug#430806: libstruts1.2-java - FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler

2007-06-27 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
Package: libstruts1.2-java Version: 1.2.9-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs hi, while doing an archive wide package rebuild your package failed to build from source for the following reason: [mkdir] Created dir:

[no subject]

2007-06-27 Thread Billigkaufen
40% - 90% Sales für alle Produkte bitte hier klicken EINGANG Tausende Onlineshops für alle Bereiche ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Processing of libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3_i386.changes

2007-06-27 Thread Archive Administrator
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3.dsc libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3.diff.gz libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___

libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-27 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libs/libstruts1.2-java/libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3.diff.gz libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3.dsc to pool/main/libs/libstruts1.2-java/libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3.dsc libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3_all.deb to

Bug#430806: marked as done (libstruts1.2-java - FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler)

2007-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:02:56 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#430806: fixed in libstruts1.2-java 1.2.9-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Processing of libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3_i386.changes

2007-06-27 Thread Archive Administrator
libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3.dsc libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3.diff.gz libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___

Processing of libgnumail-java_1.1.2-2_i386.changes

2007-06-27 Thread Archive Administrator
libgnumail-java_1.1.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libgnumail-java_1.1.2-2.dsc libgnumail-java_1.1.2-2.diff.gz libgnumail-java_1.1.2-2_all.deb libgnumail-java-doc_1.1.2-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Re: Not working for current jdk release

2007-06-27 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:42:39PM +0100, Nathan S. Haigh wrote: I tried building a package of the latest jdk release jdk-6u1-linux-i586.bin to no avail! However, it works for jdk-1_5_0_12-linux-i586.bin Please test with java-package 0.29. I added support for JDK 6 and 6u1. Cheers, Michael

libgnumail-java_1.1.2-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-06-27 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libgnumail-java-doc_1.1.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnumail-java/libgnumail-java-doc_1.1.2-2_all.deb libgnumail-java_1.1.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgnumail-java/libgnumail-java_1.1.2-2.diff.gz libgnumail-java_1.1.2-2.dsc to

Re: Not working for current jdk release

2007-06-27 Thread Nathan S. Haigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:42:39PM +0100, Nathan S. Haigh wrote: I tried building a package of the latest jdk release jdk-6u1-linux-i586.bin to no avail! However, it works for jdk-1_5_0_12-linux-i586.bin Please test with

Bug#429865: marked as done (IMAPS provider missing)

2007-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:17:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#429865: fixed in libgnumail-java 1.1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Re: Not working for current jdk release

2007-06-27 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:20:45PM +0100, Nathan S. Haigh wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 03:42:39PM +0100, Nathan S. Haigh wrote: I tried building a package of the latest jdk release jdk-6u1-linux-i586.bin to no avail!

Bug#422291: marked as done (jikes-classpath - Fails to install)

2007-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:51:35 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line jikes-classpath - Fails to install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: Not working for current jdk release

2007-06-27 Thread Nathan S. Haigh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:18:56PM +0100, Nathan S. Haigh wrote: Sorry, but I may be missing something! The current version in the debian repo's is 0.28. You mention that version 0.29 supports jdk6 - where can I otain

Processed: tagging 387425, tagging 414106, tagging 426141, tagging 427183

2007-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 387425 pending Bug#387425: classpath: NullPointerException in Swing BasicToolBarUI.setBorderToNonRollover Tags were: fixed-upstream Tags added: pending tags 414106 pending Bug#414106: xulrunner: Broken xulrunner-plugin.pc causes gcj-4.1 to FTBFS

Processed: tagging 413295

2007-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 413295 pending Bug#413295: classpath: menus missing in Swing applications There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator