eclipse 3.3 packing

2007-09-01 Thread Alban Browaeys
Hi I want to help with eclipse 3.3 packaging. I did the attached patch changes against the svn . This include : eclipse-ant-manifest eclipse-fileinitializer eclipse-gnuformatterjdt eclipse-gnuformatterjdtui diff against svn trunk. Please tells me what needs works at this stage of the

Processed: raising severity of ftbfs reports with GCC-4.2 which is now the default GCC

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 387989 serious Bug#387989: FTBFS: are no arguments to 'cur' that depend... (gcc regression) Bug#423823: retchmail: FTBFS: error: there are no arguments to 'cur' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'cur' must be available

Bug#439465: junit: FTBFS: javadoc errors

2007-09-01 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:32:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: junit version: 3.8.1.1-7 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on

Processing of bcel_5.2-3_amd64.changes

2007-09-01 Thread Archive Administrator
bcel_5.2-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: bcel_5.2-3.dsc bcel_5.2-3.diff.gz libbcel-java_5.2-3_all.deb libbcel-java-doc_5.2-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#439476: jarjar: FTBFS: javadoc errors

2007-09-01 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:34:46AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: jarjar version: 1.0~rc3.dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to

Bug#439488: jaxme: FTBFS: tests failed

2007-09-01 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 10:34:06AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: jaxme version: 0.5.2+dfsg-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070823 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on

bcel_5.2-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: bcel_5.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/b/bcel/bcel_5.2-3.diff.gz bcel_5.2-3.dsc to pool/main/b/bcel/bcel_5.2-3.dsc libbcel-java-doc_5.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/b/bcel/libbcel-java-doc_5.2-3_all.deb libbcel-java_5.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/b/bcel/libbcel-java_5.2-3_all.deb Override

Bug#440000: marked as done (libbcel-java: needing bcel.jar in /usr/share/ant/lib/ for ant ejbjar, jonas)

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2007 12:17:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#44: fixed in bcel 5.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#439465: marked as done (junit: FTBFS: javadoc errors)

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:59:27 +0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#439465: junit: FTBFS: javadoc errors has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#439476: marked as done (jarjar: FTBFS: javadoc errors)

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:59:27 +0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#439465: junit: FTBFS: javadoc errors has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processing of bouncycastle_1.37-1_amd64.changes

2007-09-01 Thread Archive Administrator
bouncycastle_1.37-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: bouncycastle_1.37-1.dsc bouncycastle_1.37.orig.tar.gz bouncycastle_1.37-1.diff.gz libbcprov-java_1.37-1_all.deb libbcprov-java-doc_1.37-1_all.deb libbcmail-java_1.37-1_all.deb

bouncycastle_1.37-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: bouncycastle_1.37-1.diff.gz to pool/main/b/bouncycastle/bouncycastle_1.37-1.diff.gz bouncycastle_1.37-1.dsc to pool/main/b/bouncycastle/bouncycastle_1.37-1.dsc bouncycastle_1.37.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/b/bouncycastle/bouncycastle_1.37.orig.tar.gz libbcmail-java-doc_1.37-1_all.deb

Bug#430560: marked as done (New upstream version)

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#430560: fixed in bouncycastle 1.37-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#430562: marked as done (New upstream version)

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#430562: fixed in bouncycastle 1.37-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#436974: libjakarta-poi-java: new upstream

2007-09-01 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:48:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: libjakarta-poi-java Severity: wishlist There's a new upstream release at: http://poi.apache.org/ Is anyone working on it? Rene Engelhardt is working on a new package. Cheers, Michael

Bug#436392: marked as done (ganymed-ssh2: FTBFS: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: antlr.TokenStreamException)

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 1 Sep 2007 19:29:06 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#436392: ganymed-ssh2: FTBFS: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: antlr.TokenStreamException has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: Re: Bug#439860: Missing dependency on libcommons-io-java package

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 439860 libcommons-fileupload-java 1.2-1 Bug#439860: Missing dependency on libcommons-io-java package Bug reassigned from package `tomcat5.5-admin' to `libcommons-fileupload-java'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#279246: Work From Home

2007-09-01 Thread Mission Houses Museum
Mission Houses Museum Work Opportunity Are you currently looking for an opportunity to work from home or direct from your computer. We have alot of churches,government bodies,banks,companies and other offices around making donations through our mission house to assist the poor all

Bug#439860: marked as done (Missing dependency on libcommons-io-java package)

2007-09-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:32:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#439860: fixed in libcommons-fileupload-java 1.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Re: Why is not building on i386 ?

2007-09-01 Thread Michael Koch
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:50:31PM +0100, Marco Rodrigues wrote: Hi! http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8675624/buildlog_ubuntu-gutsy-i386.jetty_5.1.10-3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz The error is pretty clear: [javac] source level should be comprised in between '1.3' and '1.6' (or '5', '5.0', ..., '7'