Bug#445119: This package is two years old

2007-10-03 Thread Encolpe Degoute
Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : On 10/3/07, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: argouml The last offical version is the 0.24 and was launched the Feb 15, 2007. The 0.19.8 have been released the Nov 8, 2005. Is there a maintener for this package ? Yes but not very active at the

Bug#445119: This package is two years old

2007-10-03 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 10/3/07, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : Yes but not very active at the moment, but you are free to help of course: http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/TODO/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/package/tarballs$ svn co http://svn.alioth.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/package

Bug#445119: This package is two years old

2007-10-03 Thread Encolpe Degoute
Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : On 10/3/07, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Arnaud Vandyck a écrit : Yes but not very active at the moment, but you are free to help of course: http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/TODO/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp/package/tarballs$ svn co

Bug#445119: This package is two years old

2007-10-03 Thread Encolpe Degoute
Julien Cristau a écrit : On Wed, Oct 3, 2007 at 13:09:30 +0200, Encolpe Degoute wrote: Package: argouml Severity: critical You'll need some justification if you want to make this a critical bug. The whole system doesn't get broken just because this particular package is a bit old. The

Bug#445119: This package is two years old

2007-10-03 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On 10/3/07, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Julien Cristau a écrit : You'll need some justification if you want to make this a critical bug. The whole system doesn't get broken just because this particular package is a bit old. The goal was to awake mainteners... It seems to

libpixie-java_0.8.7-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

2007-10-03 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libpixie-java_0.8.7-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libp/libpixie-java/libpixie-java_0.8.7-1.diff.gz libpixie-java_0.8.7-1.dsc to pool/main/libp/libpixie-java/libpixie-java_0.8.7-1.dsc libpixie-java_0.8.7-1_all.deb to pool/main/libp/libpixie-java/libpixie-java_0.8.7-1_all.deb

Bug#442748: tomcat5.5: FTBFS if build twice in a row

2007-10-03 Thread Michael Koch
Version: 5.5.23-1 On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:46:35PM +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote: dpkg-source: warning: file servletapi/jsr154/dist/docs/api/javax/servlet/ServletOutputStream-uses.html has no final newline (either original or modified version) dpkg-source: warning: file

Bug#442748: marked as done (tomcat5.5: FTBFS if build twice in a row)

2007-10-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:41:27 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#442748: tomcat5.5: FTBFS if build twice in a row has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#441122: Fwd: Re: Bug#441122: cacao - FTBFS: undefined reference to `__data_start'

2007-10-03 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:41:47PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Cyril Brulebois: Forwarding the question to the (hopefully) appropriate persons. From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#441122: cacao - FTBFS: undefined reference to `__data_start' To: Cyril Brulebois

Processing of tomcat5.5_5.5.25-1_amd64.changes

2007-10-03 Thread Archive Administrator
tomcat5.5_5.5.25-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tomcat5.5_5.5.25-1.dsc tomcat5.5_5.5.25.orig.tar.gz tomcat5.5_5.5.25-1.diff.gz tomcat5.5_5.5.25-1_all.deb libtomcat5.5-java_5.5.25-1_all.deb tomcat5.5-webapps_5.5.25-1_all.deb

tomcat5.5_5.5.25-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2007-10-03 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libtomcat5.5-java_5.5.25-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5.5/libtomcat5.5-java_5.5.25-1_all.deb tomcat5.5-admin_5.5.25-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5.5/tomcat5.5-admin_5.5.25-1_all.deb tomcat5.5-webapps_5.5.25-1_all.deb to pool/main/t/tomcat5.5/tomcat5.5-webapps_5.5.25-1_all.deb

Processing of kaffe_1.1.8-1_amd64.changes

2007-10-03 Thread Archive Administrator
kaffe_1.1.8-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kaffe_1.1.8-1.dsc kaffe_1.1.8.orig.tar.gz kaffe_1.1.8-1.diff.gz kaffe_1.1.8-1_all.deb kaffe-common_1.1.8-1_all.deb kaffe-dev_1.1.8-1_all.deb jikes-kaffe_1.1.8-1_all.deb kaffe-doc_1.1.8-1_all.deb

kaffe_1.1.8-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2007-10-03 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: jikes-kaffe_1.1.8-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kaffe/jikes-kaffe_1.1.8-1_all.deb kaffe-common_1.1.8-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-common_1.1.8-1_all.deb kaffe-dev_1.1.8-1_all.deb to pool/main/k/kaffe/kaffe-dev_1.1.8-1_all.deb kaffe-doc_1.1.8-1_all.deb to

kaffe override disparity

2007-10-03 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): kaffe-doc_1.1.8-1_all.deb: package says section is doc, override says interpreters. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the

Bug#433906: marked as done (kaffe: not binNMU safe)

2007-10-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:02:07 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#433906: fixed in kaffe 2:1.1.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Jetty security issue?

2007-10-03 Thread Greg Wilkins
Hi security team and Jetty package maintainers, I'm the main developer of the Jetty Java HTTP Server. I have been contacted by a Nico Golde @ debian.org asking about the availability of a fix for a security vulnerability for the debian package of Jetty but that the maintainers had no time to