Processed: setting package to libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5 tomcat5.5-admin tomcat5.5-webapps, tagging 445857 ...

2008-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 package libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5 tomcat5.5-admin tomcat5.5-webapps Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tomcat5.5-admin libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5-webapps tomcat5.5 tags 445857 +

Re: Tomcat 5.5 needs commons-io and commons-fileupload

2008-01-02 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 08:31:24PM +0200, Aviv Ben-Yosef wrote: Hello. Yesterday I installed tomcat-5.5 on my lenny box. When I tried to deploy a WAR using the tomcat-admin I received a nasty stack-trace about it not being able to find the DefferedInputStream class. Some googling led me to

Processed: setting package to libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5 tomcat5.5-admin tomcat5.5-webapps, tagging 452366

2008-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 package libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5 tomcat5.5-admin tomcat5.5-webapps Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tomcat5.5-admin libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5-webapps tomcat5.5 tags 452366 +

Bug#457956: /etc/init.d/tomcat5.5 doesn't check user right to start or stop tomcat and hangs

2008-01-02 Thread Vera Mickael
Michael Koch a écrit : On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 03:40:30PM +0100, Vera Mickael wrote: Package: tomcat5.5 Version: 5.5.20-2 Severity: important The script should warn the user that has no rights for this operation. As you may notice I use my own jdk package but I don't think this has

Bug#458631: cacao: FTBFS: error: variable '_Jv_JNIInvokeInterface' has initializer but incomplete type

2008-01-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: cacao version: 0.98-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: make[5]: Entering directory

Bug#457956: /etc/init.d/tomcat5.5 doesn't check user right to start or stop tomcat and hangs

2008-01-02 Thread Michael Koch
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:14:51AM +0100, Vera Mickael wrote: Michael Koch a écrit : On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 03:40:30PM +0100, Vera Mickael wrote: Package: tomcat5.5 Version: 5.5.20-2 Severity: important The script should warn the user that has no rights for this operation.

Bug#458411: marked as done (tomcat5.5: spurious symlink in /etc/tomcat5.5/)

2008-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:40:56 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#458411: tomcat5.5: spurious symlink in /etc/tomcat5.5/ has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#458411: tomcat5.5: spurious symlink in /etc/tomcat5.5/

2008-01-02 Thread Michael Koch
Hello Matti, On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 03:44:28AM +0200, Matti Lindell wrote: Package: tomcat5.5 Version: 5.5.25-4 Severity: minor In debian/tomcat5.5.postinst there seems to be unnecessary symlink call ln -sf /etc/tomcat5.5 /var/lib/tomcat5.5/conf which is already done in

Processed: Re: Bug#458606: /usr/bin/eclipse: sudo apt-get --purge remove libswt3.2-gtk-* reinstall worked for me.

2008-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 458606 normal Bug#458606: /usr/bin/eclipse: sudo apt-get --purge remove libswt3.2-gtk-* reinstall worked for me. Severity set to `normal' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#458606: /usr/bin/eclipse: sudo apt-get --purge remove libswt3.2-gtk-* reinstall worked for me.

2008-01-02 Thread Michael Koch
severity 458606 normal thanks On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:03:49AM +0800, Jivan Amara wrote: Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.1-6 Severity: grave File: /usr/bin/eclipse Justification: renders package unusable This bug started for me after installing and removing two UML editors that interface

Bug#457956: /etc/init.d/tomcat5.5 doesn't check user right to start or stop tomcat and hangs

2008-01-02 Thread Vera Mickael
I have added check and graceful abort. But I really you should use a shell alias if you really need to restart tomcat5.5 so much. I cant see a reason why this should be needed (with hot deployment) but I dont know your usecase. You are true I should use an alias. My use case is the port of

Bug#458696: mockobjects: FTBFS: Cannot reduce the visibility of the inherited method from Assert

2008-01-02 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: mockobjects version: 0.09-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080101 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. Relevant part: dpkg-source: building mockobjects in

Bug#458399: jetty: Jetty depends on a java 1.5 package

2008-01-02 Thread Marcel Ammerlaan
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:15:13AM +0100, marcel wrote: Package: jetty Version: 5.1.14-1 Severity: important The JspServlet contained in libtomcat5.5-java is compiled with Java 1.5 (class version 49.0) which will not run on a java 1.4 runtime which should be enough to run Jetty.

Chegou uma recomendacao de um amigo

2008-01-02 Thread Ana
Você foi recomendado por um Amigo! Um amigo seu visitou nosso site e recomendou seu e-mail: Seu amigo acessou nosso site e recomendou que você conhecesse nossos cursos. Acesse http://www.cursos24horas.vai.la e confira suas opções. Quem Somos? O Cursos 24 Horas é um site que busca o aprendizado

Processing of batik_1.6-4_i386.changes

2008-01-02 Thread Archive Administrator
batik_1.6-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: batik_1.6-4.dsc batik_1.6-4.diff.gz libbatik-java_1.6-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Bug#413103: marked as done ([Debian Etch] Problem with libbatik-java (/usr/bin/rasterizer))

2008-01-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#413103: fixed in batik 1.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your