Processing of maven-clean-plugin_2.2-2_i386.changes

2009-01-04 Thread Archive Administrator
maven-clean-plugin_2.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: maven-clean-plugin_2.2-2.dsc maven-clean-plugin_2.2-2.diff.gz libmaven-clean-plugin-java_2.2-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___

Processing of maven-resources-plugin_2.3-2_i386.changes

2009-01-04 Thread Archive Administrator
maven-resources-plugin_2.3-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: maven-resources-plugin_2.3-2.dsc maven-resources-plugin_2.3-2.diff.gz libmaven-resources-plugin-java_2.3-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Processing of maven-archiver_2.3-2_i386.changes

2009-01-04 Thread Archive Administrator
maven-archiver_2.3-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: maven-archiver_2.3-2.dsc maven-archiver_2.3-2.diff.gz libmaven-archiver-java_2.3-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___

maven-archiver_2.3-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-01-04 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: libmaven-archiver-java_2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/maven-archiver/libmaven-archiver-java_2.3-2_all.deb maven-archiver_2.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/m/maven-archiver/maven-archiver_2.3-2.diff.gz maven-archiver_2.3-2.dsc to pool/main/m/maven-archiver/maven-archiver_2.3-2.dsc

maven-archiver override disparity

2009-01-04 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libmaven-archiver-java_2.3-2_all.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct

maven-debian-helper_0.1_i386.changes REJECTED

2009-01-04 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Hi Maintainer, rejected, various issues. The copyright file misses Copyright (c) 2003 Stefan Gybas sgy...@debian.org on 2 files: cdbs/maven.mk, cdbs/maven-vars.mk Also, this package really makes on shudder. Build-Depending on oneself is almost always wrong and to be avoided. Please, either

Bug#271654: Should fop now be moved out of contrib

2009-01-04 Thread Daniel Dickinson
Does fop have anything left that *requires* non-free? I don't think it does, in which case it could be moved to main. Regards, Daniel -- And that's my crabbing done for the day. Got it out of the way early, now I have the rest of the afternoon to sniff fragrant tea-roses or strangle cute

Bug#510828: [libjmac-java] Add a command-line launcher script for easier invocation

2009-01-04 Thread Roman Mamedov
Package: libjmac-java Version: 1.74-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Currently, JMAC can be invoked as a command line tool using the syntax: $ java -jar /usr/share/java/jmac.jar command infile [outfile] I propose adding a simple launcher script into /usr/bin/, called jmac with the following