Bug#274484: bsh shebang line: confirm failure

2009-07-26 Thread Jan-Pascal van Best
just to confirm it isn't something extremely singular with the
reporter's system, I'd like to confirm that on my system, running the
sample bsh script with ./test.bsh also fails.

Jan-Pascal




___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Processing of libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7_i386.changes

2009-07-26 Thread Archive Administrator
libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7.dsc
  libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7.diff.gz
  libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7_all.deb
  libjlha-java-doc-ja_0.0.20050504-7_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Processing of jmp_0.51-2_amd64.changes

2009-07-26 Thread Archive Administrator
jmp_0.51-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  jmp_0.51-2.dsc
  jmp_0.51-2.diff.gz
  jmp_0.51-2_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-07-26 Thread Archive Administrator

Accepted:
libjlha-java-doc-ja_0.0.20050504-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/libj/libjlha-java/libjlha-java-doc-ja_0.0.20050504-7_all.deb
libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libj/libjlha-java/libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7.diff.gz
libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7.dsc
  to pool/main/libj/libjlha-java/libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7.dsc
libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7_all.deb
  to pool/main/libj/libjlha-java/libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7_all.deb


Override entries for your package:
libjlha-java-doc-ja_0.0.20050504-7_all.deb - optional doc
libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7.dsc - source java
libjlha-java_0.0.20050504-7_all.deb - optional java

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


jmp_0.51-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-07-26 Thread Archive Administrator

Accepted:
jmp_0.51-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/j/jmp/jmp_0.51-2.diff.gz
jmp_0.51-2.dsc
  to pool/main/j/jmp/jmp_0.51-2.dsc
jmp_0.51-2_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/j/jmp/jmp_0.51-2_amd64.deb


Override entries for your package:
jmp_0.51-2.dsc - source devel
jmp_0.51-2_amd64.deb - optional devel

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#507287: marked as done (maven-ant-helper: please do not hard code source=target=1.4)

2009-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:19:40 +0100
with message-id 4a6c3bcc.9050...@laposte.net
and subject line Fixed in maven-ant-helper 6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #507287,
regarding maven-ant-helper: please do not hard code source=target=1.4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
507287: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507287
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: maven-ant-helper
Version: 3
Severity: normal

Hi,

the package would be more useful if the source and target versions of
javac could be configured.

Cheers,
Torsten


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

---End Message---
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#508050: marked as done (maven-ant-helper: does not work with newer modello)

2009-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:20:19 +0100
with message-id 4a6c3bf3.3000...@laposte.net
and subject line Fixed in maven-ant-helper 6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #508050,
regarding maven-ant-helper: does not work with newer modello
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
508050: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508050
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: maven-ant-helper
Version: 3
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Owner: Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org

The package does no longer work with the current modello package. The
fix has already been committed to the 'experimental' branch in SVN. This
bug is just a reminder, that the branch should be merged to trunk and
the package should be uploaded after all the Depends of libmodello-java
have been accepted by the ftp-masters.

Torsten


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

---End Message---
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Re: jetty6 vs jetty as a package name

2009-07-26 Thread Michael Koch
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
 Michael Koch wrote:
  On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:33:45PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
  The discussion is probably over because jetty 6.1.19-1 has been
  accepted into experimental. But we can still call the next major
  version jetty7.
  
  As long as jetty 6.x is not in unstable nothing is decided. Its still
  possible to do jetty 5.x uploads to unstable and upload jetty6 6.x to
  unstable too.
 
 OK, let me know what your final decision is on how it will be named once
 it reaches unstable. It will affect the name of the package I'll soon
 upload to Ubuntu to provide Jetty6 libraries to Eucalyptus. It will
 still make a much simpler sync in the future if it were called jetty6,
 but it's still your decision :)

Personally I see the is as another reason to name it jetty6 as collaboration
is important for us. Even when I dont use Ubuntu myself I think we should
collaborate as much as possible to manage our developer resources better.
I doesn't make sense to make the life of our developers more hard then it
already is.


Cheers,
Michael

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Re: Bug#533049: ITP: eclipse-l10n-japanese-3.5.0

2009-07-26 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi,

On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:08:49 +0900
Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, 
 pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
 
Package name: eclipse-l10n-japanese-3.5.0

 Now eclipse package is updated to 3.4, so I'll prepare -l10n packages
 for 3.4. BTW, is it better that I would change its package name as 
 eclipse-l10n-japanese? (with no eclipse version)
 

-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


electric 8.09-1 MIGRATED to testing

2009-07-26 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the electric source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 8.08-1
  Current version:  8.09-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


dom4j 1.6.1+dfsg.2-1 MIGRATED to testing

2009-07-26 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the dom4j source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.6.1+dfsg-3
  Current version:  1.6.1+dfsg.2-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


gamine

2009-07-26 Thread acumen
BDSM Orr The Anrt Of Kinky sex.www.45meds net

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#503837: liblog4j1.2-java: missing org.apache.log4j.jmx package

2009-07-26 Thread Ludovic Claude

log4j JMX implementation depends on the
com.sun.jdmk.comm.HtmlAdaptorServer class which can be found in OpenMDK
(https://opendmk.dev.java.net/). This project is mostly open source
(dual GPL2/CDDL license) except some binary blobs which, if removed, may
limit only some parts of the functionality - hopefully not what's
interesting us.

Ludovic



___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


clone

2009-07-26 Thread Mock Stempert
Ingredients for a Successful Warm Sensuual Night Wcith Your Lover.www.45meds net

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Processing of jflex_1.4.3-1_i386.changes

2009-07-26 Thread Archive Administrator
jflex_1.4.3-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  jflex_1.4.3-1.dsc
  jflex_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz
  jflex_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
  jflex_1.4.3-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


jflex_1.4.3-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-07-26 Thread Archive Administrator

Accepted:
jflex_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
jflex_1.4.3-1.dsc
  to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.3-1.dsc
jflex_1.4.3-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.3-1_all.deb
jflex_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz


Override entries for your package:
jflex_1.4.3-1.dsc - source java
jflex_1.4.3-1_all.deb - optional java

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 538063 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#538778: antlr3: ANTLR v3 C header files and C run-time libraries are missing

2009-07-26 Thread Vsevolod Krishchenko
Package: antlr3
Version: 3.0.1+dfsg-4
Severity: important


Antlr v3 could generate C parsers. Still, there are no anlr C headers in Debian 
(antlr3.h and so on). C ANTLR runtime 
libraries are also missed.

All these files are from libantlr3c-3.x.x.tar.gz archive from original 
antlr.org sources.

I suppose that at least two additional packages should be created: libantlr3c 
and libantlr3c-dev. 
I afraid the same problem is present with C++ and CLR generators.

Failure log:

$ cat test01.g
grammar test01;
options {  
language=C;
}
r : ID;
ID: 'a'..'z' + ;
$ antlr3 test01.g
$ gcc -c test01Lexer.c
In file included from test01Lexer.c:17:
test01Lexer.h:41:23: error: antlr3.h: No such file or directory
(and so on..)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages antlr3 depends on:
ii  java-gcj-compat [java2-runtim 1.0.80-5.1 Java runtime environment using GIJ
ii  libstringtemplate-java3.1-3  StringTemplate templating engine f

Versions of packages antlr3 recommends:
ii  antlr3-gcj  3.0.1+dfsg-4 language tool for constructing rec

antlr3 suggests no packages.

-- debconf-show failed



___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers


Bug#480132: aspectj: Bootstrap completed

2009-07-26 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi all,

I've used some hours of my spare time to fix #480132 aspectj: please upload 
to main.

Here is the changes:

  [ Damien Raude-Morvan ]
  * Add myself to Uploaders
  * Updated Standards-Version to 3.8.2:
- Describe quilt patch system in README.source
- Move aspectj package to java section
  * Switch to quilt to manage patches:
- Use patchsys-quilt.mk in debian/rules
- Build-Depends on quilt
- Refresh all patches
  * Extends bootstrap.xml script:
- Rebuild jdtcore-for-aspectj.jar from jdtcore-for-aspectj-src.zip
  Build-Depends on eclipse-platform
- Bootstrap using aspectj itself for modules/lib/aspectj/lib/*.jar
  Build-Depends on aspectj
- Rebuild and overwrite org.aspectj/modules/lib/build/build.jar
  * New 05_build_classpath patch to build AJDT
  * Add Build-Depends on libasm3-java, eclipse-platform, gjdoc and lynx-cur

I've commited all this in SVN :
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/aspectj

Can someone review my changes over bootstrapping ?

Missing bits before a upload to main:
- review debian/copyright (i.e. include all src.zip licences)
- register all documentation in doc-base
- try to build with default-jdk instead of openjdk-6

Cheers,
-- 
Damien Raude-Morvan / www.drazzib.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#538063: marked as done (libjflex-java: Broken link installed in /usr/share/ant/lib)

2009-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:50:07 +
with message-id e1mvbbb-0006jk...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#538063: fixed in jflex 1.4.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #538063,
regarding libjflex-java: Broken link installed in /usr/share/ant/lib
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
538063: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538063
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Package: libjflex-java
Version: jflex
Severity: minor

/usr/share/ant/lib/jflex.jar link is broken


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers jaunty-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'jaunty-updates'), (500, 'jaunty-security'), (500, 
'jaunty-backports'), (500, 'jaunty')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-13-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: jflex
Source-Version: 1.4.3-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jflex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

jflex_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
jflex_1.4.3-1.dsc
  to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.3-1.dsc
jflex_1.4.3-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.3-1_all.deb
jflex_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/j/jflex/jflex_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 538...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (supplier of updated jflex package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:07:58 +0200
Source: jflex
Binary: jflex
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers 
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net
Description: 
 jflex  - lexical analyzer generator for Java
Closes: 538063
Changes: 
 jflex (1.4.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream (bug fix) release
   * Fixed dangling symlink in usr/share/ant/lib (Closes: #538063)
   * Bumped Standards-versions to 3.8.2 - no changes required.
   * Bumped to debhelper version 7.
   * Fixed spelling errors.
   * Corrected section to java.
   * Corrected some paths in debian/rules and debian/docs.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 421f44d2cbd0ad2b980df04bcfa258664c9074e8 1288 jflex_1.4.3-1.dsc
 fcbbbcbd015e97ba910592ad73b928631a6b4fac 1214183 jflex_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz
 d65b4b67370cfd2bd238bcd5dd5d84905f25c7a0 4657 jflex_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
 0f2ba1e609328994f999c9b99b2bb6d17f587b28 1071838 jflex_1.4.3-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 52a72301000ab1e23311712f7e062bbff05f90c675e4c91e8338cbc516316a5b 1288 
jflex_1.4.3-1.dsc
 04ebeeb2721790bbec47380aea9528d81ae4a91096e4832c7486af5312f60047 1214183 
jflex_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz
 4469ad33df8d4f1c2f6745ed2dbde0422bcc6e98ecd346623a91b5317bc213cf 4657 
jflex_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
 1745654a4ee9450d8c1c6d7ffadac46d4a1e9b1a199c79824601931c917b38d0 1071838 
jflex_1.4.3-1_all.deb
Files: 
 7b4f0088a724dc345b2d88c76ce55943 1288 java optional jflex_1.4.3-1.dsc
 1ea65540a6f4666fd199979b80330e27 1214183 java optional jflex_1.4.3.orig.tar.gz
 d11f3489393635231e5f99bb47a96c97 4657 java optional jflex_1.4.3-1.diff.gz
 8017402121c4523fdeede20e703342b8 1071838 java optional jflex_1.4.3-1_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkpsyBAACgkQpldmHVvob7nUVACfZUFSm7YNEe9MuHA1kqS6cxFw
mUAAn02Z1R5Frw5qHuqaku1d5NWlO5k5
=opG0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---End Message---
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#529252: latexdraw: doesn't start -- fixed by newer version of openjdk-6

2009-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 unarchive 529005
Bug #529005 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com} 
[libaccess-bridge-java-jni] missing symlink in package
Unarchived Bug 529005
 reassign 529005 openjdk-6
Bug #529005 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com} 
[libaccess-bridge-java-jni] missing symlink in package
Bug reassigned from package 'libaccess-bridge-java-jni' to 'openjdk-6'.
Bug #529005 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com} [openjdk-6] missing 
symlink in package
Bug No longer marked as found in versions java-access-bridge/1.26.0-1.
Bug #529005 {Done: Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com} [openjdk-6] missing 
symlink in package
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #529005 to the same values 
previously set
 reassign 529252 openjdk-6
Bug #529252 [latexdraw] latexdraw: doesn't start
Bug reassigned from package 'latexdraw' to 'openjdk-6'.
Bug #529252 [openjdk-6] latexdraw: doesn't start
Bug No longer marked as found in versions latexdraw/2.0.2+1-2.
Bug #529252 [openjdk-6] latexdraw: doesn't start
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #529252 to the same values 
previously set
 close 529252
Bug#529252: latexdraw: doesn't start
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Paul van Tilburg 
pau...@debian.org

 merge 529005 529252
Bug#529005: missing symlink in package
Bug#529252: latexdraw: doesn't start
Merged 529005 529252.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers