On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 25/10/09 at 19:39 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:54:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libgnucrypto-java
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags:
On 26/10/09 at 08:54 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 08:12:50PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 25/10/09 at 19:39 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:54:45PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libgnucrypto-java
Version: 2.1.0-3
Severity:
GnuPG signature check failed on libstax-java_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes
gpg: Signature made Mon Oct 26 10:35:44 2009 UTC using DSA key ID 9DCAE61E
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
(Exit status 2)
/libstax-java_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature!
Removing
GnuPG signature check failed on maven-repo-helper_0.9_amd64.changes
gpg: Signature made Mon Oct 26 11:59:22 2009 UTC using DSA key ID 9DCAE61E
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
(Exit status 2)
/maven-repo-helper_0.9_amd64.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature!
Removing
Package: maven-docck-plugin
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu karmic ubuntu-patch
Seen on
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34406545/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.maven-docck-plugin_1.0-2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
Reverting the 1.0-2
forgot to add: fails on current unstable as well
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
No, the build was done with version 1.15.4. You need to build-depend on
install-info, which is no longer provided directly by dpkg.
dpkg people, wouldn't it make sense to depend on install-info in dpkg,
No, the whole point of using Breaks against
FYI: The status of the libjgraphx-java source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.2.4-2
Current version: 1.0.2.6-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the libxstream-java source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.3.1-4
Current version: 1.3.1-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
FYI: The status of the libproxool-java source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.9.1-1
Current version: 0.9.1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Hi all.
I'm new to this mailing list and with maven and maven-debian-helper, so
maybe I'm missing something trivial.
I've started comaintaining libgettext-commons-java with Andreas Putzo.
Upsteam started using maven to build it, so I think it as good idea to
move the package build rules to
Hi Giovanni,
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Giovanni Mascellani
mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it wrote:
What is wrong?
AFAIK the versions of maven-plugins are somewhat hard coded but you
can patch out the maven-assembly-plugin from pom.xml. I think it is
not needed for the Debian package.
Hi Giovanni,
Welcome aboard ! :)
[You should post to debian-j...@lists.debian.org as pkg-java-
maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org is just a read-only list to monitor
uploads and bugs on our packages]
Le lundi 26 octobre 2009 21:31:45, Torsten Werner a écrit :
Hi Giovanni,
On Mon, Oct 26,
13 matches
Mail list logo
