Bug#551545:

2009-11-17 Thread Onkar Shinde
Batik includes some classes (such as used by squiggle) which are related to GUI. But I agree that most of the classes do not use and Swing/ATK APIs. I would prefer splitting the launcher scripts for various programs such as squiggle, rasterizer in a separate binary package called batik. This

jexcelapi_2.6.12-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-11-17 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: jexcelapi_2.6.12-1.diff.gz to main/j/jexcelapi/jexcelapi_2.6.12-1.diff.gz jexcelapi_2.6.12-1.dsc to main/j/jexcelapi/jexcelapi_2.6.12-1.dsc jexcelapi_2.6.12.orig.tar.gz to main/j/jexcelapi/jexcelapi_2.6.12.orig.tar.gz libjexcelapi-java-doc_2.6.12-1_all.deb to

libjgraphx-java 1.0.2.7-1 MIGRATED to testing

2009-11-17 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libjgraphx-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.2.6-1 Current version: 1.0.2.7-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

libjgroups2.6-java_2.6.13.GA-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-11-17 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: libjgroups2.6-java_2.6.13.GA-1.diff.gz to main/libj/libjgroups2.6-java/libjgroups2.6-java_2.6.13.GA-1.diff.gz libjgroups2.6-java_2.6.13.GA-1.dsc to main/libj/libjgroups2.6-java/libjgroups2.6-java_2.6.13.GA-1.dsc libjgroups2.6-java_2.6.13.GA-1_all.deb to

Bug#556780: eclipse does not start (java.lang.RuntimeException: Widget disposed too early!)

2009-11-17 Thread Vladimir Stavrinov
Package: eclipse Version: 3.4.1-1 Severity: important The problem in subject exists with kernel 2.6.30 and 2.6.31, but not 2.6.26. This does not depend on jvm: java-6-openjdk, java-6-sun, java-gcj -- all of them end up with the same result -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid

Bug#556811: icedtea-gcjwebplugin: FTBFS: gcjwebplugin.cc:50:19: error: npupp.h: No such file or directory

2009-11-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: icedtea-gcjwebplugin Version: 1.0+dak1-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091117 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: g++ -g -O2 -DXP_UNIX -DOJI

Bug#556780: Similar Bug

2009-11-17 Thread Jeff Wallace
This bug might be similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483832 ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-11-17 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-1.diff.gz to main/m/mathpiper/mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-1.diff.gz mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-1.dsc to main/m/mathpiper/mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-1.dsc mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-1_all.deb to main/m/mathpiper/mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-1_all.deb mathpiper_0.0.svn2556.orig.tar.gz

mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-11-17 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-2.diff.gz to main/m/mathpiper/mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-2.diff.gz mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-2.dsc to main/m/mathpiper/mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-2.dsc mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-2_all.deb to main/m/mathpiper/mathpiper_0.0.svn2556-2_all.deb Override entries for your package: