libjsr305-java_0.1~+svn49-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:35:19 -0430 Source: libjsr305-java Binary: libjsr305-java libjsr305-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 0.1~+svn49-5 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

libspring-java_3.0.6.RELEASE-7_amd64.changes REJECTED

Version check failed (source=libspring-java, version=3.0.6.RELEASE-7, other-version=3.1.0~M2-2, suite=experimental) === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the

Bug#683632: marked as done (also publish as com.google.code.findbugs/jsr305?)

Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 06:03:07 + with message-id e1t1adb-0006yb...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#683632: fixed in libjsr305-java 0.1~+svn49-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #683632, regarding also publish as com.google.code.findbugs/jsr305? to be marked as done. This

Processing of guice_3.0-2_amd64.changes

guice_3.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: guice_3.0-2.dsc guice_3.0-2.debian.tar.gz libguice-java_3.0-2_all.deb libguice-java-doc_3.0-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the

Processing of guava-libraries_11.0.2-2_amd64.changes

guava-libraries_11.0.2-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: guava-libraries_11.0.2-2.dsc guava-libraries_11.0.2-2.debian.tar.gz libguava-java_11.0.2-2_all.deb libguava-java-doc_11.0.2-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on

Bug#684815: jenkins-instance-identity: FTBFS: missing org.bouncycastle:bcprov:jar:debian

Source: jenkins-instance-identity Version: 1.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant

Bug#684826: jenkins: FTBFS: missing org.bouncycastle:bcprov:jar:debian

Source: jenkins Version: 1.447.2+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#684829: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth: FTBFS: missing org.bouncycastle:bcprov:jar:debian

Source: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth Version: 1.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part

Bug#684841: wagon2: FTBFS: missing org.bouncycastle:bcprov:jar:debian

Source: wagon2 Version: 2.2-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules

Bug#684853: svnkit: FTBFS: [javac] /«BUILDDIR»/svnkit-1.3.5+dfsg/svnkit/src/org/tigris/subversion/javahl/SVNClient.java:588: cannot find symbol

Source: svnkit Version: 1.3.5+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: make[1

Bug#684586: jenkins: Allow configuration of httpListenAddress using /etc/default/jenkins

On 11/08/12 15:00, Nicholas J Humfrey wrote: Please can you add support for setting of the httpListenAddress option in Jekins, using the /etc/default/jenkins configuration file. This will allow binding to localhost (or other alternative IP) and then use another webserver (such as Apache) as

Bug#678032: libiscwt-java: Compatibility Patch for Java 7

Package: libiscwt-java Version: 5.3.20100629-2 Followup-For: Bug #678032 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu quantal ubuntu-patch openjdk-7-transition -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve

guava-libraries_11.0.2-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:59:08 -0430 Source: guava-libraries Binary: libguava-java libguava-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 11.0.2-2 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

guice_3.0-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:34:14 -0430 Source: guice Binary: libguice-java libguice-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 3.0-2 Distribution: experimental Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Bug#683644: marked as done (please also package extensions (e.g. assistedinject))

Your message dated Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:54:18 + with message-id e1t1o82-0006xa...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#683644: fixed in guice 3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #683644, regarding please also package extensions (e.g. assistedinject) to be marked as done. This means that

Is sun-java6 6.26-0squeeze1 vulnerable to CVE-2012-1723?

Sorry if this has been addressed elsewhere. I searched the list and bug reports and didn't see anything. I'm running Squeeze and today Iceweasel informed me that Java Plug-in 1.6.0_26 is insecure and recommended disabling it. Versions below 1.6.0_33 or between 1.7.0 and 1.7.0_5 are now in the

Re: Is sun-java6 6.26-0squeeze1 vulnerable to CVE-2012-1723?

On 2012-08-14 23:16, Kevin wrote: Sorry if this has been addressed elsewhere. I searched the list and bug reports and didn't see anything. I'm running Squeeze and today Iceweasel informed me that Java Plug-in 1.6.0_26 is insecure and recommended disabling it. Versions below 1.6.0_33 or

Re: Is sun-java6 6.26-0squeeze1 vulnerable to CVE-2012-1723?

It is quite possible that sun-java6 is vulnerable to that CVE; I haven't checked. The problem is that we cannot do anything about it as we do not have permission to distribute updates for sun-java6[1]... Thanks for the explanation. I understand this package has been dropped from testing and

Processing of svnkit_1.3.5+dfsg-4_amd64.changes

svnkit_1.3.5+dfsg-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: svnkit_1.3.5+dfsg-4.dsc svnkit_1.3.5+dfsg-4.debian.tar.gz svnkit_1.3.5+dfsg-4_all.deb libsvnkit-java_1.3.5+dfsg-4_all.deb libsvnkit-java-doc_1.3.5+dfsg-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian

svnkit_1.3.5+dfsg-4_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:22:32 -0430 Source: svnkit Binary: svnkit libsvnkit-java libsvnkit-java-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.3.5+dfsg-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Bug#684853: marked as done (svnkit: FTBFS: [javac] /«BUILDDIR»/svnkit-1.3.5+dfsg/svnkit/src/org/tigris/subversion/javahl/SVNClient.java:588: cannot find symbol)

...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: svnkit Version: 1.3.5+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 678032 + pending Bug #678032 [libiscwt-java] libiscwt-java: FTBFS with OpenJDK-7 - uses internal proprietary API which has changed Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 678032: