spam related white list

Hi, I've added these senders to the white list for pkg-java-maintainers und pkg-java-commits to ease the moderater's job: ^.+@alioth.debian.org ^.+@debian.org ^.+@canonical.com ^.+@kubuntu.org ^.+@ubuntu.com And I have whitelisted the [SCM] subject for pkg-java-commits if I got the syntax

tomcat7 7.0.28-4 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the tomcat7 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 7.0.28-3+nmu1 Current version: 7.0.28-4 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

Processing of jruby_1.5.6-5_amd64.changes

jruby_1.5.6-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jruby_1.5.6-5.dsc jruby_1.5.6-5.debian.tar.gz jruby_1.5.6-5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

jruby_1.5.6-5_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:22:36 +0100 Source: jruby Binary: jruby Architecture: source all Version: 1.5.6-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers

Bug#694694: marked as done (jruby: CVE-2012-5370)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:48:14 + with message-id e1tiwkq-0006d7...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#694694: fixed in jruby 1.5.6-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #694694, regarding jruby: CVE-2012-5370 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#692442: Patches for CVE-2012-5783 and CVE-2012-5784

Hi. Both patches attached at upstream JIRA and reopened HTTPCLIENT-1265. Waiting for response. Kind regards Alberto __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for

Bug#687692: examples

Hi Tobias Here's a testcase. In sid it works fine, but if I use the jars provided in testing it fails. Important: the pdf file is protected , so it's necesary bouncycastle to decrpyt it. Normal pdf files don't fail because they don't need bouncycastle. Attached sample pdf and sample java that

Bug#687692: testcase bug 687692

Hie Tobias and Niels I've upload to the BTS a testcase for the bug. It's a protected pdf sample file and a simple java program that counts the number of pages of a PDF. It works fine in sid and fails in testing. Grettings Alberto __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team