tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.dsc
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.debian.tar.gz
tomcat6-common_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.dsc
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.debian.tar.gz
tomcat6-common_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb
tomcat6-user_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb
Version check failed:
Your upload included the source package tomcat6, version 6.0.41-2+squeeze5,
however stable already has version 6.0.35-6+deb7u1.
Uploads to squeeze-lts must have a lower version than present in stable.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand
On Sun, 23, Nov, 2014 at 10:29:59AM +0100, Holger Levsen spoke thus..
Hi,
On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
Version check failed:
Your upload included the source package tomcat6, version 6.0.41-2+squeeze5,
however stable already has version 6.0.35-6+deb7u1.
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 04:39:23PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
Package: src:groovy2
Version: 2.2.2+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Well, it FTBFS on armhf, but did it ever build on this arch? I find
your
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.dsc
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.debian.tar.gz
tomcat6-common_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.dsc
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5.debian.tar.gz
tomcat6-common_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb
tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb
tomcat6-user_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_all.deb
binary:tomcat6-extras is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are routinely processed through to the
FYI: The status of the libapache-mod-jk source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.2.37-3
Current version: 1:1.2.37-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
FYI: The status of the openjdk-7-jre-dcevm source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 7u60-2
Current version: 7u60-3
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 20:08:38 +0100
Source: tomcat6
Binary: tomcat6-common tomcat6 tomcat6-user libtomcat6-java libservlet2.4-java
libservlet2.5-java libservlet2.5-java-doc tomcat6-admin tomcat6-examples
tomcat6-docs
java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11.dsc
java3d_1.5.2+dfsg-11.debian.tar.xz
libjava3d-java_1.5.2+dfsg-11_all.deb
libjava3d-java-doc_1.5.2+dfsg-11_all.deb
libjava3d-jni_1.5.2+dfsg-11_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 09:09:20 -0800
Source: java3d
Binary: libjava3d-java libjava3d-jni libjava3d-java-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.5.2+dfsg-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian
robocode_1.9.2.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
robocode_1.9.2.4-1.dsc
robocode_1.9.2.4.orig.tar.gz
robocode_1.9.2.4-1.debian.tar.xz
robocode_1.9.2.4-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
robocode_1.9.2.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
robocode_1.9.2.4-1.dsc
robocode_1.9.2.4.orig.tar.gz
robocode_1.9.2.4-1.debian.tar.xz
robocode_1.9.2.4-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
__
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:38:32 +0100
Source: robocode
Binary: robocode
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9.2.4-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
Your message dated Sun, 23 Nov 2014 18:33:53 +
with message-id e1xsbyr-0004j3...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#551877: fixed in robocode 1.9.2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #551877,
regarding robocode: New upstream version available
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On 11/23/2014 04:16 AM, Mark Hymers wrote:
On Sun, 23, Nov, 2014 at 10:29:59AM +0100, Holger Levsen spoke thus..
Hi,
On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
Version check failed:
Your upload included the source package tomcat6, version 6.0.41-2+squeeze5,
however stable
Source: javamail
Version: 1.5.2-3
Severity: important
From my pbuilder build log (on amd64):
...
---
T E S T S
---
Running MimeMultipartParseTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0,
On 11/23/2014 12:03 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:43 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
oh, btw: jessie has -2, sid -3, with changes unsuitable for wheezy and
targeted at jessie. this needs an unblock request to let
On 11/23/2014 11:02 AM, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Source: javamail
Version: 1.5.2-3
Severity: important
[snip]
Failed tests: test(com.sun.mail.smtp.SMTPWriteTimeoutTest): No exception
I have mixed feelings about these sorts of failures. I understand the
need to build in a non-networked
On 11/23/2014 01:16 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, tony mancill wrote:
The cruft report for unstable will look *very* different due to 6.0.41-3
being a *radically* different package.
no, the report exactly looks like this *because* of this:
* Build
Le 23/11/2014 22:09, tony mancill a écrit :
The decision/requirement to remove tomcat6 from jessie has been
requested by the Security team for quite a while, and the 6.0.41-3
source upload effectively does this by just building libservlet2.5-java
(without which we would have many packages
Le 23/11/2014 22:20, tony mancill a écrit :
Emmanuel, any concerns with an upload to disable this test?
I share the same feelings and I think this kind of failure should be
ignored. My only concern is that we weaken the test coverage and I tend
to dislike that, but if hitting a DNS server is a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 770457 !
Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install
some files in eclipse-rcp
Owner recorded as Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
owner 770457 !
thanks
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:56:31 + James Cowgill
james.cowg...@imgtec.com wrote:
Package: eclipse-rcp
Version: 3.8.1-5.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.9
Control: block 769248 by -1
Hi,
When building eclipse using dpkg-buildpackage -B, some files in the
On 11/21/2014 01:35 AM, James Cowgill wrote:
Source: androidsdk-tools
Version: 22.2+git20130830~92d25d6-1
Severity: minor
Hi,
Currently the Vcs fields of this package point to:
git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-java/androidsdk-tools.git
remotetea_1.0.7-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
remotetea_1.0.7-3.dsc
remotetea_1.0.7-3.debian.tar.xz
remotetea_1.0.7-3_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
__
This is the maintainer address of
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 00:38:35 +0100
Source: remotetea
Binary: remotetea
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
Package: activemq
Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-1
Apache ActiveMQ as packaged for Debian seems to ship with an old XStream
(1.4.2) library[1][2] which allows for instantiating arbitrary classes. This
could be leveraged for system command execution as demonstrated against
versions before 1.4.7.
# dpkg
merge 770457 769248
affects 770457 androidsdk-tools
thanks
The problem lies in eclipse-rcp. I confirm that androidsdk-tools builds
fine on i386 when all jface components are correctly installed into
eclipse-rcp:i386. Hence I am going to merge #770457 with #769248.
Markus
signature.asc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
merge 770457 769248
Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install
some files in eclipse-rcp
Unable to merge bugs because:
blocks of #769248 is '' not '769248'
blockedby of #769248 is '770457' not ''
owner of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 770457 769248
Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install
some files in eclipse-rcp
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #769248 is 'src:androidsdk-tools' not 'eclipse-rcp'
Failed to forcibly
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 769248 eclipse-rcp
Bug #769248 [src:androidsdk-tools] androidsdk-tools: FTBFS in jessie/i386:
sdkstats/src/main/java/com/android/sdkstats/DdmsPreferenceStore.java:22: error:
package org.eclipse.jface.preference does not exist
Bug
Control: tags -1 patch
I have committed the patch to Git master. I'm also going to attach it to
this bug report.
We probably need to revert the last revision or parts of it to get this
bug fix into Jessie.
Two other RC bugs for eclipse are still left.
Markus
From
Processing control commands:
tags -1 patch
Bug #770457 [eclipse-rcp] eclipse-rcp: debian/rules build-arch does not install
some files in eclipse-rcp
Added tag(s) patch.
--
770457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770457
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unblock 769248 by 770457
Bug #769248 [eclipse-rcp] androidsdk-tools: FTBFS in jessie/i386:
sdkstats/src/main/java/com/android/sdkstats/DdmsPreferenceStore.java:22: error:
package org.eclipse.jface.preference does not exist
769248 was blocked by:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
close 770441
Bug #770441 [src:androidsdk-tools] androidsdk-tools: Vcs-* fields do not point
to a valid repository
Marked Bug as done
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
770441:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 770744 + patch
Bug #770744 [src:javamail] javamail: FTBFS under pbuilder with USENETWORK=no:
Test failure
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
770744:
On 11/23/2014 02:03 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 23/11/2014 22:20, tony mancill a écrit :
Emmanuel, any concerns with an upload to disable this test?
I share the same feelings and I think this kind of failure should be
ignored. My only concern is that we weaken the test coverage and I tend
On 11/23/2014 04:54 PM, Georgi Geshev wrote:
Package: activemq
Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-1
Apache ActiveMQ as packaged for Debian seems to ship with an old XStream
(1.4.2) library[1][2] which allows for instantiating arbitrary classes.
This could be leveraged for system command execution as
41 matches
Mail list logo
