Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 786378 + sid stretch
Bug #786378 [libguava-java-doc,libguava18-java-doc] libguava18-java-doc and
libguava-java-doc: error when trying to install together
Added tag(s) sid and stretch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: retitle -1 libxbean-java: please support Groovy 2.x
On 22.05.2015 21:47, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:25:16PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
*sigh*
Sorry for the confusion. libxbean-java still FTBFS when it is built
against a 2.x
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:15:38 +0200
Source: jboss-modules
Binary: libjboss-modules-java libjboss-modules-java-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:26:52 +0200
Source: jboss-logmanager
Binary: libjboss-logmanager-java libjboss-logmanager-java-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:17:38 +0100
Source: apache-curator
Binary: libcurator-parent-java libcurator-client-java libcurator-framework-java
libcurator-test-java libcurator-recipes-java libcurator-discovery-java
Architecture:
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:00:22 +0200
Source: jboss-logging
Binary: libjboss-logging-java libjboss-logging-java-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:29:44 +0100
Source: jsmpp
Binary: libjsmpp-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.1.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:07:55 +0100
Source: leveldb-java
Binary: libleveldb-api-java libleveldb-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
same reason as other version
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Hi Markus,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
The copyright holder of:
jackson-dataformat-xml-jackson-dataformat-xml-2.5.3\src\test\java\com\fasterxml\jackson\dataformat\xml\failing\Issue97Test.java
is Nu Echo Inc. They don't appear in any other file and give no license
information
Hi Miguel,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Your debian/copyright says that alle files are under Apache-2.0 and MIT.
According to the file headers, this seems to be wrong. Some files are under
MIT and some files are under Apache-2.0, but no file is under both licenses.
Thorsten
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 786553 serious
Bug #786553 [libjffi-java] libjffi-java: Incompatible change in jffi 1.2.x
makes gradle fail
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:25:16PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
*sigh*
Sorry for the confusion. libxbean-java still FTBFS when it is built
against a 2.x version of Groovy.
Reopening this bug.
However, if libxbean-java doesn't plan to port their code to Groovy 2.x
I think we can close
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 09:51:15PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
This bug report isn't so bad after all because it would be nice if all
packages migrated to Groovy 2.x including libxbean-java. Supporting
Groovy 1.x and Groovy 2.x is currently a necessity but we should aim for
supporting only
Processing control commands:
severity -1 wishlist
Bug #733099 [src:libxbean-java] libxbean-java: FTBFS when built against Groovy
2.2.1
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important'
retitle -1 libxbean-java: please support Groovy 2.x
Bug #733099 [src:libxbean-java] libxbean-java: FTBFS when built
plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2-5.dsc
plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2-5.debian.tar.xz
libplexus-compiler-1.0-java-doc_1.9.2-5_all.deb
libplexus-compiler-1.0-java_1.9.2-5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 784173 !
Bug #784173 [src:maven-bundle-plugin] maven-bundle-plugin: Please package 2.4.0
or a more recent release
Owner recorded as Miguel Landaeta nomad...@debian.org.
tags 784173 + pending
Bug #784173 [src:maven-bundle-plugin]
owner 784173 !
tags 784173 + pending
thanks
I already prepared an upload for 2.4.0-1 and will be available after bnd
2.1.0-1 can be uploaded to the archive.
--
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key.
Faith means not
plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2-5.dsc: Refers to non-existing file
'plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2.orig.tar.gz'
Perhaps you need to include the file in your upload?
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which
plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2-5.dsc
plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2.orig.tar.gz
plexus-compiler-1.0_1.9.2-5.debian.tar.xz
libplexus-compiler-1.0-java-doc_1.9.2-5_all.deb
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:00:21PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi Miguel,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Your debian/copyright says that alle files are under Apache-2.0 and MIT.
According to the file headers, this seems to be wrong. Some files are under
MIT and some
binary:libplexus-compiler-1.0-java is NEW.
binary:libplexus-compiler-1.0-java-doc is NEW.
source:plexus-compiler-1.0 is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and
guava-libraries_18.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
guava-libraries_18.0-1.dsc
guava-libraries_18.0.orig.tar.xz
guava-libraries_18.0-1.debian.tar.xz
libguava-java_18.0-1_all.deb
libguava-java-doc_18.0-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2015 10:22:31 +
with message-id e1yvk63-0006oa...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#751544: fixed in guava-libraries 18.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #751544,
regarding guava-libraries: FTBFS with Java 8: TypeVariableImpl doesn't
implement
Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2015 10:22:31 +
with message-id e1yvk63-0006ou...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#729355: fixed in guava-libraries 18.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #729355,
regarding libguava-java: Please update the description
to be marked as done.
This means
On 22.05.2015 07:06, tony mancill wrote:
On 05/21/2015 01:00 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
I have prepared a new upstream release of libapache-mod-jk which fixes
RC bug #783233, better known as CVE-2014-8111. I would be glad if
someone reviewed the package and
Control: reassign -1 libguava18-java-doc 18.0-1
Thank you for the report Ralf.
This is an issue with the libguava18-java-doc package, the path to the
Javadoc wasn't changed when the package was cloned. Since libguava-java
has just been updated to the version 18 this issue will go away once we
Processing control commands:
reassign -1 libguava18-java-doc 18.0-1
Bug #786378 [libguava-java-doc,libguava18-java-doc] libguava18-java-doc and
libguava-java-doc: error when trying to install together
Bug reassigned from package 'libguava-java-doc,libguava18-java-doc' to
'libguava18-java-doc'.
Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2015 13:12:10 +0200
with message-id 555f0f0a.9050...@apache.org
and subject line Re: Bug#775686: libguava-java: please packaging version 18.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #775686,
regarding libguava-java: please packaging version 18.0
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 775686 18.0-1
Bug #775686 {Done: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org} [libguava-java]
libguava-java: please packaging version 18.0
Marked as fixed in versions guava-libraries/18.0-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
libhibernate-commons-annotations-java_3.2.0.Final-3_amd64.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libhibernate-commons-annotations-java_3.2.0.Final-3.dsc
libhibernate-commons-annotations-java_3.2.0.Final-3.debian.tar.xz
Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2015 13:04:21 +
with message-id e1yvmcf-0001lq...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#750754: fixed in libhibernate-commons-annotations-java
3.2.0.Final-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #750754,
regarding libhibernate-commons-annotations-java: FTBFS with
* Emmanuel Bourg:
libguava-java has been updated to the version 18, elasticsearch can
now depend on it instead of libguava18-java.
Are you fucking kidding me?
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
libhibernate-commons-annotations-java_3.2.0.Final-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for
libhibernate-commons-annotations-java_3.2.0.Final.orig.tar.gz:
According to the control file the size hash should be 30873,
but libhibernate-commons-annotations-java_3.2.0.Final.orig.tar.gz has 32953.
If you did not
libhibernate-commons-annotations-java_3.2.0.Final-3_amd64.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libhibernate-commons-annotations-java_3.2.0.Final-3.dsc
libhibernate-commons-annotations-java_3.2.0.Final-3.debian.tar.xz
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:01:27 +0200
Source: libhibernate-commons-annotations-java
Binary: libhibernate-commons-annotations-java
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.2.0.Final-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Le 22/05/2015 15:26, Hilko Bengen a écrit :
Are you fucking kidding me?
If you mean that libguava18-java has just landed in unstable 3 days ago
and is already obsolete I agree that's unfortunate and I understand your
frustration. You made a wise and pragmatic decision back in October to
clone
FYI: The status of the freeplane source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.3.12-1
Current version: 1.3.15-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the java-package source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.56
Current version: 0.59
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the clojure1.4 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.4.0+dfsg-3
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney
FYI: The status of the knopflerfish-osgi source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.3.3-3
Current version: 5.1.0+dfsg1-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 11:31:37 +0200
Source: guava-libraries
Binary: libguava-java libguava-java-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 18.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
Package: libjffi-java
Version: 1.2.7-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
the upgrade of libjffi-java from 1.0.2 to 1.2.7 causes all gradle builds
(in sid) to fail in the 'processResources' task, because
com.kenai.jffi.InvocationBuffer has been changed from interface to
abstract class.
Here
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 783233 1:1.2.37-4
Bug #783233 {Done: Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de} [src:libapache-mod-jk]
CVE-2014-8111: mod_jk ignores JkUnmount rules for subtrees of previous JkMount
rules
Marked as found in versions libapache-mod-jk/1:1.2.37-4.
Package: libwoodstox-java
Version: 1:4.1.3-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I have seen quite some packages in the past weeks that add
the woodstox-core-asl artifact to maven.ignoreRules. I did so myself
until I found out that we ship the woodstox-core-lgpl artifact
instead.
I think both licensing
The classes in the two jars are identical, shipping two jars in one
package would be a waste of space.
This dichotomy between ASL/LGPL artifacts is absurd in my opinion,
upstream should ship the library once, simply state it's dual licensed
and let the users decide the license they want for their
On 22.05.2015 19:44, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
The classes in the two jars are identical, shipping two jars in one
package would be a waste of space.
This dichotomy between ASL/LGPL artifacts is absurd in my opinion,
upstream should ship the library once, simply state it's dual licensed
and let
Your message dated Fri, 22 May 2015 20:17:32 +0200
with message-id 555f72bc.4060...@gambaru.de
and subject line Re: libxbean-java: FTBFS when built against Groovy 2.2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #733099,
regarding libxbean-java: FTBFS when built against Groovy 2.2.1
to be marked as done.
Processing control commands:
reopen 733099
Bug #733099 {Done: Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de} [src:libxbean-java]
libxbean-java: FTBFS when built against Groovy 2.2.1
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #733099 to the same values
previously set
--
733099:
Control: reopen 733099
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 09:47:43 -0300 Miguel Landaeta nomad...@debian.org
wrote:
Package: src:libxbean-java
Version: 3.7-5
Severity: important
I rebuilt this package in experimental to check its compatibility with
Groovy 2.2.1 and I found this error during build time.
50 matches
Mail list logo
