Bug#871346: marked as done (activemq: FTBFS: ERROR Failed to execute goal on project activemq-client: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.apache.activemq:activemq-client:jar:

2017-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2017 05:34:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#871346: fixed in activemq 5.14.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #871346, regarding activemq: FTBFS: ERROR Failed to execute goal on project activemq-client:

activemq_5.14.5-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-08-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 20:57:58 -0700 Source: activemq Binary: libactivemq-java libactivemq-java-doc activemq Architecture: source all Version: 5.14.5-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java

Processing of activemq_5.14.5-3_amd64.changes

2017-08-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
activemq_5.14.5-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: activemq_5.14.5-3.dsc activemq_5.14.5-3.debian.tar.xz activemq_5.14.5-3_all.deb activemq_5.14.5-3_amd64.buildinfo libactivemq-java-doc_5.14.5-3_all.deb libactivemq-java_5.14.5-3_all.deb Greetings,

openjdk-8-jre-dcevm REMOVED from testing

2017-08-20 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the openjdk-8-jre-dcevm source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 8u112-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #853592: openjdk-8-jre-dcevm: ftbfs with GCC-7 The

Re: activemq_5.14.5-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-08-20 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:34:02AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > activemq_5.14.5-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for activemq_5.14.5.orig.tar.xz: > According to the control file the size hash should be 2611308, > but activemq_5.14.5.orig.tar.xz has 2631428. > > If you did not include

jruby-joni 2.1.12-1 MIGRATED to testing

2017-08-20 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the jruby-joni source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.1.11-3 Current version: 2.1.12-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

java-allocation-instrumenter REMOVED from testing

2017-08-20 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the java-allocation-instrumenter source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.0.1-1 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: Bug #869251: java-allocation-instrumenter FTBFS:

activemq_5.14.5-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-08-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
activemq_5.14.5-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for activemq_5.14.5.orig.tar.xz: According to the control file the size hash should be 2611308, but activemq_5.14.5.orig.tar.xz has 2631428. If you did not include activemq_5.14.5.orig.tar.xz in your upload, a different version might already be known to

Processing of activemq_5.14.5-3_amd64.changes

2017-08-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
activemq_5.14.5-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: activemq_5.14.5-3.dsc activemq_5.14.5-3.debian.tar.xz activemq_5.14.5-3_all.deb activemq_5.14.5-3_amd64.buildinfo libactivemq-java-doc_5.14.5-3_all.deb libactivemq-java_5.14.5-3_all.deb Greetings,

Processed: Re: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 870987 ftp.debian.org Bug #870987 [src:azureus] azureus: should azureus be removed from unstable? Bug reassigned from package 'src:azureus' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #870987 to the same values

Bug#793492: Bug#814176: Bug#793492: Bug#814176: azureus: (Build-)Depends on OpenJDK 7

2017-08-20 Thread Markus Koschany
reassign 870987 ftp.debian.org retitle 870987 RM: azureus -- RoQA; missed both jessie and stretch thanks Am 08.08.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > On 08/08/2017 06:44 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > >> 1.5 years later this hasn't changed, shall we now drop it? > > Actually there has been