Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-08-01 Thread DDPOMail robot
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === antlr3: = 1 Release Critical bug(s): - #591119 http://bugs.debian.org/591119 antlr3: FTBFS: maven error === azureus: = 1

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-01-12 Thread DDPOMail robot
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === antlr: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed soon: - #555498 http://bugs.debian.org/555498 antlr depends on default-jre-headless and

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-02-13 Thread DDPOMail robot
=== antlr: = 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s): - #555498 http://bugs.debian.org/555498 antlr depends on default-jre-headless and something between lenny and squeeze makes gpt break === azureus: = 1 Release Critical or Release Goal bug(s): - #568940 http://bugs.debian.org/568940

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-03-23 Thread DDPOMail robot
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === antlr: = 2 Release Critical bug(s): - #555498 http://bugs.debian.org/555498 antlr depends on default-jre-headless and

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-04-18 Thread DDPOMail robot
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === ant: = No migration to testing for 33 days. See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ant === antlr: =

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2010-05-17 Thread DDPOMail robot
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === axis: = Missing build(s) on mips mipsel s390 sparc This might need manual action from your side. See

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2009-10-28 Thread DDPOMail robot
This is an automated mail. These mails are sent twice a month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail === bouncycastle: = There is 1 unfixed security issue(s), please fix them. See

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-06-22 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Java Maintainers, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: cacao: This package has not been in testing for more than 191 days. charva: This package has not been in testing for more than 751 days. This package has not been able

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-08-23 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Java Maintainers, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === antlr: = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 123 days. === axis: = This package has not been in testing for 123 days. = This package

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-09-26 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Java Maintainers, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === cacao: = This package has not been in testing for 287 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 287 days. See

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2007-10-22 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Java Maintainers, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === cacao: = This package has not been in testing for 313 days. = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 313 days. See

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-01-09 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Java Maintainers, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === bouncycastle: = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 130 days. See http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=bouncycastle ===

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-02-05 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Java Maintainers, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === ant: = This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #459560 http://bugs.debian.org/459560 crashes at once on hppa architecture This is

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-03-03 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Java Maintainers, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === ant: = This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #459560 http://bugs.debian.org/459560 crashes at once on hppa architecture This is

Some of your Debian packages might need attention

2008-04-01 Thread DDPOMail robot
Dear Debian Java Maintainers, The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) you maintain in Debian: === ant: = This package has 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #459560 http://bugs.debian.org/459560 crashes at once on hppa architecture This is

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2008-05-01 Thread DDPOMail robot
=== ant: = No migration to testing for 31 days. See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ant === antlr: = No migration to testing for 124 days. See http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=antlr === bouncycastle: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2008-06-16 Thread DDPOMail robot
=== cacao: = 3 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #441122 http://bugs.debian.org/441122 cacao - FTBFS: undefined reference to `__data_start' - #458631 http://bugs.debian.org/458631 cacao: FTBFS: error: variable _Jv_JNIInvokeInterface has initializer but incomplete type

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2008-07-01 Thread DDPOMail robot
=== bcel: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #487004 http://bugs.debian.org/487004 bcel: FTBFS: build blocks === cacao: = 3 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #441122 http://bugs.debian.org/441122 cacao - FTBFS: undefined reference to

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2008-07-15 Thread DDPOMail robot
=== cacao: = 3 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #441122 http://bugs.debian.org/441122 cacao - FTBFS: undefined reference to `__data_start' - #458631 http://bugs.debian.org/458631 cacao: FTBFS: error: variable _Jv_JNIInvokeInterface has initializer but incomplete type

Possible problems in your Debian packages

2008-08-26 Thread DDPOMail robot
=== cacao: = 3 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #441122 http://bugs.debian.org/441122 cacao - FTBFS: undefined reference to `__data_start' - #458631 http://bugs.debian.org/458631 cacao: FTBFS: error: variable _Jv_JNIInvokeInterface has initializer but incomplete type