Comments regarding lein-clojars_0.8.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi maintainer(s)! First of all: Could you please improve the package description? I have no idea what the purpose of that package is. Why would I like to interact with Clojars.org? And what is Leiningen? And second: This package is really tiny. Wouldn't it be possible to add it to a

Comments regarding lein-clojars_0.8.0-1_amd64.changes

Really tiny; maintainer proded __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Comments regarding omegat-plugin-tokenizer_0.4.2+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Hi maintainer(s)! According to your copyright file, your package is licensed under Apache-2 or GPL-v3, which also matches the file headers. However, omegat-plugin-tokenizer-0.4.2+dfsg/licenses/Readme_licences.txt mentiones only the GPLv3 (so I guess you should upstream to update that file). And

Bug#572982: azureus: Multiple license issues.

Hi! * Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org [101008 18:46]: At debian-java we're pretty happy with the exception and we didn't feel the need to run it through -legal. I haven't had time to make an upload with the exception documented in the debian/ folder so the bug it is still open (but the

Re: Fwd: Fwd: Comments regarding castor_1.3.1-1_amd64.changes

[ Adding Werner Guttmann to CC list; makes it easier ] Hi! Thanks for the explanation, however I still don't understand that license clause. Sorry, if its meaning is clear to everyone else, but as a non native English speaker without deeper jurisdical knowledge, I just don't know what this

Comments regarding castor_1.3.1-1_amd64.changes

Hi maintainers! Regarding the licens of your package castor, could you please clarify, what the following clause exactly means? 5. Due credit should be given to the ExoLab Project (http://www.exolab.org/). Best regards, Alexander __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java

Bug#585469: libjettison-java: Files in org/codehaus/jettison/json are licensed under the non-free json license

Package: libjettison-java Version: 1.0-1, 1.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: contains non-free files Hi! The json license used for the files in org/codehaus/jettison/json is considered non-free (The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.) Please see the recent discussions on

Comments regarding rome_1.0-1_amd64.changes

Hi maintainer! I'm going to accept your package, but please ask upstream to either add a license header to all files in the tarball or to add a license statement for the whole tarball in the top level directory. Best regards, Alexander __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java

libspring-webflow-2.0-java_2.0.8.RELEASE-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi! I'm sorry, but I reject your package, as the Academic Free License version 2.1 is despite its name considered non DFSG-free. See for example http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/10/msg00237.html and http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/10/msg00240.html. Best regards, Alexander

ant1.7_1.7.1-5_i386.changes REJECTED

As discussed on irc. please see docs/antnews.html === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

jasper_5.5.26-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

As requested by uploader === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

xmlbeans_2.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi maintainer! Citing your copyright file: = Aside from contributions to the Apache XMLBeans project, this software also includes: [..] - JAM XML Parser (external/lib/jam-0.1.0-src.jar) Copyright 2004 (c) Apache Software Foundation - Piccolo XML Parser for Java from

Re: xmlbeans_2.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi! Damien Raude-Morvan schrieb: Sorry, but we can't ship tarballs containing binary files without source (and without license statment). I therefore I reject your package from the NEW queue. I think there is some miss-understanding : external/lib/jam-0.1.0-src.jar and

jakarta-jmeter_2.3.4-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Tarball contains several jar files without sources: lib/api/geronimo-activation_1.0.2_spec-1.1.jar lib/api/geronimo-javamail_1.3.1_spec-1.1.jar lib/api/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.0.jar lib/doc/velocity-1.6.2.jar === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your