Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

2009-06-15 Thread Ana Guerrero
Thanks for dropping an answer... On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:18:06PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Ana Guerrero schrieb: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:40:49AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: I filed the quoted report almost 3 weeks ago. Resending to people listed as eclipse uploaders in case

Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned

2009-06-15 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:41:45PM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, From: Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org Third and last warning, I will orphan eclipse next

Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

2009-06-15 Thread Ana Guerrero
Hi Markus, Jens and list: On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:52:34PM +0200, Jens Kapitza wrote: Hi, can I be of any help? (I would take it over) I can offer my time but i think i need some help. You could ask to join the java team for maintaining eclipse, so you can commit in the pkg-java's SVN and

Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

2009-05-19 Thread Ana Guerrero
I filed the quoted report almost 3 weeks ago. Resending to people listed as eclipse uploaders in case they did not get it. On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.2-6.1 Severity: important After being hit by #507536 (merged with #511713

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable for eclipse afaict. The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license. Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-05-01 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote: Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable for eclipse afaict. The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license. Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at

Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?

2009-05-01 Thread Ana Guerrero
Package: eclipse Version: 3.2.2-6.1 Severity: important After being hit by #507536 (merged with #511713, #515747) and read http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507536#104 I have been looking at the status of eclipse in Debian. Eclipse's packaging is under the umbrella of the Debian

Bug#507536: it does not work here either

2009-04-30 Thread Ana Guerrero
severity 507536 serious thanks pure unstable/amd64 system here. I just installed eclipse to test something and I got this problem too. When starting eclipse from command line i got: a...@pryan:$ eclipse searching for compatible vm... testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk...not found testing

Bug#400172: cacao: FTBFS on amd64: import java/lang/management/MemoryUsage is not valid

2006-12-14 Thread Ana Guerrero
tags 400172 - unreproducible severity 400172 serious thanks On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 10:43:35AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: cacao Version: 0.97-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64, already has amd64 binaries in etch Usertags: grid5000 Hi, During a rebuild of all