Forwarded from -devel
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should
this package be orphaned?)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009
From: Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org
To: Jerry Haltom was...@larvalstage.net, Michael Koch
Hi
On Friday 27 October 2006 05:26, Jon Dowland wrote:
I have a program which requires an implementation of jar at
build-time. The Build-Depends line is non-trivial because nobody
specifies a jar virtual package.
Any reason you can't just depend on fastjar?
Package: fastjar
Uncompressed
On Friday 22 September 2006 20:58, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Shobhit Jindal wrote:
[...]
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.08: tomcat5.5.
It's a strange location...
/usr/lib/jvm is used a couple debian packages on my mixed testing/unstable
system. Seems a fairly logical place to group jvm
On Thursday 13 July 2006 03:04, Stephan Bardubitzki wrote:
Dear Friends,
my OS is Ubuntu6.06 and for development and testing purpose I need to
have the latest Java 6.0 snapshot as the default Java version.
There are a couple of user submitted patches at
[resending because I sent this to the wrong address]
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:25, Tobias Herzke wrote:
Aldous D. Penaranda wrote:
As I have mentioned in my email, libasm-java is in contrib and you
need non-free software for it. Please try making a .deb from Sun's JVM
and install that for
Package: java-package
Version: 0.27
Severity: normal
The jre included in ibm java 5 sdk seems to have a dependency on libstdc++.
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: fontmanager (libstdc++.so.5: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory)
Installing libstdc++5 fixes the problem.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:17, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Comments below.
Blair Zajac wrote:
Package: java-package
Version: 0.27
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Barry, what do you think about this? tag it wontfix? add a note in the
README.Debian? close it? add a note in the Debian Java FAQ?
If
Hi everyone.
[Erwan, this mail is for the eclipse maintainers. I've kept you cc'ed
to keep you in the discussion.]
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:32, Erwan David wrote:
And that doies not explain th gnome dependency, which is heavier, and
tottaly inadequate and, I repeat DANGEROUS.
I have an
Hi
I'm a debian user, not a debian developer, but I feel the need to chime in
here.
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 09:36, Erwan David wrote:
So you want to oblige people to use the pile of crap that gnome is. MY
freedom is also to NOT use software I think is ill designed and is a
danger.
So don't use
9 matches
Mail list logo
