jetty_6.1.18-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi. /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD is the 3-clause BSD license, you can only reference it if a 3-clause BSD license is used, which doesn't seem to be the case here. Gruesse, Frank === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or

Re: freemind_0.9.0~rc1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

for the /usr/share/common-licenses/ stuff. Gruesse. -- Frank Lichtenheld dj...@debian.org www: http://www.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java

freemind_0.9.0~rc1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi. Still some issues with the copyright file: * The GNU Classpath extension is mentioned but not included in the copyright file. * Some of the file you mention as copyright unknown have license statements in separate files: e.g. freemind/plugins/latex/Readme.txt for

freemind_0.9.0~rc1-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi. accessoires/ contains some files with differing copyrights and licenses, e.g. under the MPL 1.1, whihc is not mentioned at all in debian/copyright. Gruesse, Frank === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this

substance_5.0-3_i386.changes REJECTED

There are several licensing problems here: * from debian/copyright it is unclear what the MPL applies to, it should be made clear that this applies to src/contrib/net/xoetrope/editor/ and the copyright holder should be noted. * I don't believe that the images in

Comments regarding libjibx-java_1.0.2-1_i386.changes

Hi. debian/copyright misses a note about: ./build/src/org/jibx/binding/ant/CompileTask.java:Copyright (c) 2003, Andrew J. Glover also I'm confused because ./docs/jibx-license.html mentions other code that is included under differing licenses but I wasn't able to find this code in the source.

Comments regarding maven-plugin-tools_2.4.3-1_i386.changes

This build-depends on libmaven-plugin-tools-java, i.e. itself. Is that really necessary? ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Comments regarding plexus-containers_1.0~beta2-1_i386.changes

Isn't libplexus-containers-java missing a Depends field? ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Comments regarding maven-reporting-impl_2.0.4.1-1_i386.changes

Homepage: http://maven.apache.org/doxia/ Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java/trunk/doxia Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/doxia Looks like copypaste artifacts too me. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list

Comments regarding plexus-interpolation_1.7-1_i386.changes

This package depends on default-java which I can't seem to find anywhere? Did you mean default-jre, or default-jdk? ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#499288: Orphan

you, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ http://blog.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#499288: argouml: should this package be orphaned?

://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ Thank you, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#489952: RM: libsaxon-java-gcj [alpha hppa] -- ANAIS, RoQA; missing java support

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal The usual: Java support not available on alpha and hppa, so binaries need to be removed. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1

Bug#480776: cacao_0.99~rc5-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: C compiler cannot create executables

| ** | Build finished at 20080512-0006 | FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Full build log(s): http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=0.99~rc5-1pkg=cacaoarch=sparc Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ This file contains any messages

Bug#479529: cacao_0.99~rc3-1(mips/experimental): FTBFS: Error: opcode not supported on this processor

-buildpackage died] Full build log(s): http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=0.99~rc3-1pkg=cacaoarch=mips Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers

Bug#479529: cacao_0.99~rc3-1(mips/experimental): FTBFS: Error: opcode not supported on this processor

On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:44:21PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: | cc -I../../../../src -I../../../.. -I../../../../src -D__MIPS__ -D__LINUX__ -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wno-long-long -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L -D_XOPEN_SOURCE

Bug#477317: cacao_0.99~rc1-1(mips/experimental): FTBFS: error: 'CTX_EPC' undeclared

| FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Full build log(s): http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?ver=0.99~rc1-1pkg=cacaoarch=mips Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java

Bug#448381: flutejava_1.3-2(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: dh_nativejava fails

=sparc Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers