On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 22.01.2014 15:56, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
On 22.01.2014 15:21, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
On 21.01.2014 14:44, Gergely Nagy wrote:
- There are a couple of files in the source that have comments like:
/* this file
Dear maintainer,
As explained in a separate mail, I have to reject your upload of
relaxngcc, because even generated files need a way to be rebuilt (even
if we use the pre-built files, support for rebuilding them, or at
least documentation, must be there).
===
Please feel free to respond to
Dear maintainer,
While processing your upload of relaxngcc 1.12-1, I noticed the
following things about the packaging:
- The source tarball has been repacked, but this is not documented
anywhere, and the only sign of it is the get-orig-targz target in
debian/rules. Please document this in
Control: reassign -1 src:maven
Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org writes:
Package: maven3
There is no maven3 package, so I'm reassigning to maven, which does have
a version = 3, so I assume it is the package you meant to file the bug
against.
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification:
Package: libjfugue-java
Version: 4.0.3-2
Severity: important
I had jfugue installed earlier, but with 4.0.3-2, it was
renamed. However, no conflicts or replaces were added to libjfugue-java,
so when I tried to install it, the following happened:
$ sudo aptitude install libjfugue-java
Reading
5 matches
Mail list logo
