On 01/11/2018 12:59 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 06:09:39PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 15:49:26 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Reasons I am aware that it *might* be a bad idea are:
>>>
>>> 1. libcurl e
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 15:49:26 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> (Resending to fix the mail headers, sorry. Please reply to this one,
> not the previous one.)
>
> Hi. You're receiving this mail because you fall into one or more of the
> following categories:
> * Are associated with the curl
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 09:20:56 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 8/08/2016 à 03:04, Debian FTP Masters a écrit :
>
> > Changes:
> > javatools (0.48+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* Non-maintainer upload.
> >* Fixed the arch returned for ppc64el in java-arch.sh (closes:
:49.0
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+javatools (0.48+deb8u1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fixed the arch returned for ppc64el in java-arch.sh
+
+ -- Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> Sat, 06 Aug 2016 10:46:30 +0200
+
javatools (0.48) unstable; urgency=
Source: jffi
Version: 1.0.2-9
Severity: serious
Control: block 667906 with -1
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libffi5 is broken since we're moving to
libffi6.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:09:29 +, James Page wrote:
reopen 697617
thanks
There's no need to do that, fwiw. The bts knows if it's fixed in
a certain version then earlier ones are affected...
Cheers,
Julien
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 19:46:32 +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
So I don't think Debian package is affected by this issue, but we'll have to
wait until Oracle/Glassfish team publish some source code to confirm ths.
Did that happen in the last year?
Cheers,
Julien
__
This is the
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 01:06:12 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
plexus-containers (1.0~beta3.0.7-5) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Team upload.
* Fix FTBFS with libgoogle-collections = 1.0,
closes: #625972, #628328, #628294
#628294 and #628328 aren't filed against
Source: eclipse
Version: 3.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
See the logs linked from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=eclipse
Logs end with:
reassign 642740 fop 1:1.0.dfsg2-3
kthxbye
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 22:21:49 +0200, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
Source: xorg-docs
Version: 1:1.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110923 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 21:16:49 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy experimental sid
User: pkg-mozilla-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: xulrunner-2.0
Hi,
Since the release team started filing bugs for this, I
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:28:33 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
Hello Moritz,
You don't seem to have sent this to Moritz, only to the bug?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 611130 squeeze-can-defer
tag 611130 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 21:43:36 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: mojarra
Severity: grave
Tags: security
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-2087
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 608286 squeeze-can-defer
tag 608286 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 18:29:40 +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Package: tomcat6
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 606295 squeeze-is-blocker
kthxbye
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:26:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
This needs to be fixed for squeeze, we can't support this package if it
can't be built; and there's a bunch of reverse dependencies so removal
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 22:06:12 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
wrote:
What does antlr3 need from the network? If the resource it needs might
disappear during the squeeze lifetime, it is still RC, I think.
It tries to
On Sun, Oct 7, 2007 at 20:15:55 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
Then its perhaps best to file two bugs, one against ftp.debian.org to
remove argouml from testing and another against argouml to prevent
argouml from migrating into testing again. Then we can update argouml in
unstable when its ready
17 matches
Mail list logo
