On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
From: Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org
Third and last warning, I will orphan eclipse next saturday (20th June),
Perhaps the right thing to do is simply to have eclipse
Removing the eclipse 3.2 from the archive would be fine with me, fwiw,
especially if it motivates anyone to contribute towards getting 3.5 in.
I think removing directly is not a good idea. It is a widely used
application, so I am really hoping somebody gets interested in maintaining it.
But
2009/6/4 Raphaël Vandon vand...@esiee.fr:
hello, I saw that the version of eclipse in the repository of debian
unstable is the 3.2, while the current version available on the official
site is the 3.4. Is there any reason for this ?
Actually 3.5 should be out (in eclipse.org) real soon now :-)
Actually im on the way of repackage it (for my needs) , but im way not
a debian developer.
This is not a problem, I am not a DD either. We have at least one DD though
willing to help with sponsoring etc if the technical problems are solved.
What is the policy about eclipse plugins ? should
Wouldn't your package from Dec 2008 far better than the current solution. I
think so.
So, please, upload at least that one to experimental.
I 'm sorry but this is just not possible. We cannot pollute debian
with crap. My package is (at least was) working
and is appropriate for what it was
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
for eclipse afaict.
The only reason it was pursued was because it has
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:
severity 507536 serious
thanks
pure unstable/amd64 system here. I just installed eclipse to test something
and I
got this problem too.
When starting eclipse from command line i got:
a...@pryan:$ eclipse
searching
Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
for eclipse afaict.
The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license.
Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at least for eclipse).
Also, make sure you have installed xulrunner-dev or the
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer
christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de wrote:
...
It's quite embarrassing for Debian to only have such an outdated version of
Eclipse (which is nearly identical to not having it at all), or no or only
very old versions of the
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Kristóf Kály-Kullai kaku...@gmail.com wrote:
A few more information:
I have tried to find out exactly which file(s) it needs from xulrunner-dev,
and the surprising result is that creating an empty
/usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9 folder makes Eclipse starting.
I
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Aaron Valdes aaronval...@rogers.com wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-6.1
Severity: important
When I try to start Eclipse I get this message
testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk...found
/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java: symbol lookup error:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Marcus Better mar...@better.se wrote:
Hi,
Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
We need a project management system (aka bug tracker) to keep track of
the tasks, who is doing what and our progress.
Since we're talking about Debian packaging (right?), the Debian BTS
Hello :-)
As a christmas present, the first pre-pre-pre-alpha version of an
eclipse package is now available :-)
Even in this very preliminary stage it should already be better than
the other unofficial 3.4.x package in existence.
Features:
* It should build in
*
I 'm starting to hate gmail ;-)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: Eclipse packaging
To: Ilya consci...@mail.ru
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Ilya consci...@mail.ru wrote:
Hello everybody
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
Does that mean we need an eclipse policy following debian tradition?
IMHO a clear: YES.
Noted,
anyone else?
Without having had a look at it (because of time constraints
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: icu4j_3.8.1-1_i386.changes is NEW
To: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Rene
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Broccolalia broccola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I've seen you'd like some help for eclipse packaging on launchpad (#123064).
I can help you if you want.
I'm not an expert in packaging nor in java programming but I've successfully
created another package a few
Hello :)
We need a project management system (aka bug tracker) to keep track of
the tasks, who is doing what and our progress.
We seem to have mostly 2 options for that:
* An alioth project
* A launchpad project
I personally like launchpad a bit better due to a
Hello :)
Since we seem to be getting new team members every day (which is
already very cool and more than I expected),
I thought to post a state of the art to try and get you guys up to
speed without you having to do the reverse-engineering
that I had to.
As you all know it 's been about 2 years
Hello :)
Eclipse is its own ecosystem, with all sorts of conventions and
peculiarities. In addition, we have several applications each using
only particular
parts of eclipse e.g., just OSGi/equinox, just RCP, just SWT etc.
So, IMHO there is lots of room for incompatibilities and pain, like
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Andreas Tille til...@rki.de wrote:
Pantelis, I hope you don't mind if I foreward your PM to the list.
Everybody is invited to join this effort. Hopefully it is not me alone
who is interested in working on this.
No problem at all. I was just pressing the reply
OK, the package builds find in my pbuilder environment. I do not see any
open bugs for libicu4j-java. I would be able to do an upload to Debian
mirror on Monday - if nobody insists.
Great :)
Cheers,
Pantelis
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
Hi!
As part of the effort to get recent eclipse into debian eventually, a
seemingly Low Hanging Fruit Job
is upgrading icu4j to 3.8.1.
There is already a package in https://launchpad.net/~rockwalrus/+archive
so it would be nice if a debian developer can review this package and either:
*
So my first action now was to subscribe to the list.
Done.
I also asked to add myself to the alioth project to be able to commit to
the development svn.
I would advise anybody who really intends to be helpful to follow these
two steps.
I 'm not a debian developer, would it be possible
24 matches
Mail list logo
