Steffen Moeller wrote:
Hello,
I know I should make this a RFP, but I am a bit lost
about what the perfect package name would
possibly be.
A program that I am interested to package comes
with the jimi.jar. Is there a way to have this
Java Image I/O Debianised?
Many thanks and regards
package: maven2
owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for your report. I'll investigate further later this week.
Cheers,
Paul
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
tags 481571 +confirmed
Thanks for the report. Yes, we need to add an explicit manifest.
Upstream's looks like:
Main-Class: org.w3c.tidy.Tidy
Name: org/w3c/tidy/Tidy.class
Java-Bean: True
Thanks,
Paul
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
John Davos wrote:
Good Day All,
I installed tomcat5.5.26-1on testing and unstable and the startup script
(/etc/init.d/tomcat5.5) doesn't start tomcat and exits without output in the
log or at console. I started with a fresh install of debian testing
I know this method of starting tomcat
=20024
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: build.xml
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Paul Cager (paulcager
Michael Koch wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:33:32PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: cdk
Version: 1:1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080407 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
...
This broken with the last javacc update. Teh Nom*.java
It looks as though libcommons-cli-java needs to build-depend on
ant-optional.
I was surprised it didn't fail with pbuilder - does pbuilder still
install Recommends:?
I'll prepare a fix.
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
Thank you for your bug report, and I agree that it should be
severity=important. I'd prefer lenny to go out without Maven rather than
with this bug.
This problem (and http://bugs.debian.org/458895) happen because Debian's
version of Maven uses version 1.1 of Apache's commons-cli library, whereas
Michael Koch wrote:
If we can't work around this we will need to upload a commons-cli-1.0
package just for maven2. Would not be nice but a workaround.
Hi Michael,
It's good to have that option as a backup.
Currently commons-cli 1.1 silently discards all but the first instance
of any option
Paul Cager wrote:
Mike Paul wrote:
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.8-3
Followup-For: Bug #458895
[...]
It turns out that /usr/share/maven2/lib/commons-cli.jar is
the one that makes the difference: if I copy that jar into a
freshly-unpacked copy of Apache's Maven distribution, the problem
Mike Paul wrote:
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.8-3
Followup-For: Bug #458895
[...]
It turns out that /usr/share/maven2/lib/commons-cli.jar is
the one that makes the difference: if I copy that jar into a
freshly-unpacked copy of Apache's Maven distribution, the problem
occurs there too.
Valliet Emmanuel wrote:
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.8-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
I installed the maven2 debian package, and tried to make an empty j2ee
package using the artifacts, and it failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/java/sources$ mvn -e archetype:create
On Sat, December 22, 2007 21:03, Marcus Better wrote:
Paul Cager wrote:
E.g. the POM could require JUnit-3.8.1 but Debian has packaged version
3.8.2. In this case we would set up a link in the temporary Maven
repository:
debian/.m2/repository/.../junit-3.8.1.jar - /usr/share/java/junit.jar
On Wed, December 19, 2007 17:52, Dalibor Topic wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Many thanks for the clarifications.
So if we are talking about refactoring /usr/share/java, let's do it in
some sort of Debian way. We'll write a wrapper around different build
system to let them understand our
Marcus Better wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
What about a maven plugin that leave the jar in /usr/share/java, but
register the jar.
if mvn present:
mvn install -DgroupId=... -DversionId=... -DartifactId=...
/usr/share/java/my.jar
If it's meant to be run in postinst then Maven might not
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Paul Cager wrote:
Marcus Better wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
What about a maven plugin that leave the jar in /usr/share/java, but
register the jar.
if mvn present:
mvn install -DgroupId=... -DversionId=... -DartifactId=...
/usr/share/java/my.jar
If it's meant
On Mon, December 3, 2007 01:48, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
[. . .]
Note that the first
attempt to invoke eclipse:eclipse used this command line (as advised
in hudson build notes):
mvn -o -DdownloadSources=true eclipse:eclipse
Yes, they advise offline mode. It appears that this may create the
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.7-2
Severity: wishlist
2.0.8 was released on 27-Nov-07
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Tiago Saboga wrote:
Hi!
I have finished the packaging of omegat [1] and libhtmlparser-java [2]
and I think it would be better to join the java packaging team. What's
the way to go? Should I just upload to mentors and ask here for a
sponsor?
Thanks,
Tiago Saboga.
[1] -
tags 449188 +confirmed
thanks
Thanks for the report. org/apache/maven/wagon/providers/ssh/knownhost/
is present in upstream's wagon-ssh-common-1.0-beta-2.jar but not in
Debian's. I'll fix it and check for other missing packages.
Thanks,
Paul
___
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Gar. Double typo...
- Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 17:28:34 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: javacc help needed
Organization: The Debian Project
tags 445006 +pending
thanks
The fix I previously suggested for this bug would not work with
java-gcj, due to the different ways the Java packages are set up in the
alternatives system. E.g.
/usr/bin/java - /etc/alternatives/java -
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun/jre/bin/java
/usr/bin/java -
Michael Koch wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 06:37:55PM +0200, Krzysztof Sobolewski wrote:
Package: maven2
Version: 2.0.7-1
Severity: normal
I have two Java packages installed: sun-java5-jre and sun-java6-jre.
The latter is selected as /usr/bin/java by update-java-alternatives.
Now when
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 21/08/07 at 22:24 +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
tags 432540 + pending
tags 305325 + pending
tags 433350 + pending
tags 434316 + pending
Hi,
This has been pending for more than a month. Is your
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: wagon
version: 1.0-beta-2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070905 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
[...]
The full build log is
Using locations:
/usr/share/checkstyle/dtd
/usr/share/checkstyle/xsl
seems to fit in with what other packages do.
Unless anyone can think of better locations, that's what I'll implement.
Thanks,
Paul
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
Woops - meant to send this to the list...
Original Message
Subject: Re: [pkg-java] r3873 - in trunk/maven2/debian: . patches
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:23:25 +0100
From: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi Maintainer,
rejected, i cant find the license info in the tarball. The only thing i
find is one file that contains Apache 1.1, nothing else, and that was a
file from the testsuite.
Please talk with upstream to enhance this and then reupload. Thanks.
Woops - why
Package: checkstyle
Severity: wishlist
Release 4.3
Fixed Bugs:
* The StrictDuplicateCode check didn't report correct results when multiple
duplicate code regions were overlapping. (bug 1564465)
* Fixed NPE in FallThrough check (bug 1472228)
* Fixed typo in Command Line example
Michael Koch wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:08:49PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
BUILD FAILED
/build/user/checkstyle-4.1+dfsg/build.xml:220: Javadoc returned 5
at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Javadoc.execute (Javadoc.java:2077)
at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute
Hi Eric,
Can I just check that you intended to donate libjcalendar-java to the
pkg-java team? It's in the svn but never made it into an upload.
If that's OK then I will merge Torsten's NMU into svn and produce a new
upload to record the pkg-java maintainer.
Thanks,
Paul
On Tue, June 19, 2007 1:02 am, Paul Cager wrote:
Hi Jason,
Sorry to bother you again, but you are also listed as the Project Lead
for Doxia.
I'm intending to package Doxia for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that some source files do not have any copyright or license
information
On Sat, June 16, 2007 11:27 am, Paul Cager wrote:
Hi Jason,
I'm intending to package plexus-velocity for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that the source files do not have any license information
within them.
Would it be possible to fix it? Can I help in any way?
Thanks,
Paul
i
On Mon, July 2, 2007 3:59 pm, Paul Cager wrote:
On Tue, June 19, 2007 1:02 am, Paul Cager wrote:
I'm intending to package Doxia for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that some source files do not have any copyright or license
information within them.
These files have no copyright
Jason van Zyl wrote:
It's all ASL licensed if not marked as such.
On 2 Jul 07, at 8:06 AM 2 Jul 07, Paul Cager wrote:
On Sat, June 16, 2007 11:27 am, Paul Cager wrote:
Hi Jason,
I'm intending to package plexus-velocity for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that the source files do
Hi Jason,
Sorry to bother you again, but you are also listed as the Project Lead
for Doxia.
I'm intending to package Doxia for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that some source files do not have any copyright or license
information within them.
Would it be possible to fix this? As before
Hi Jason,
I'm intending to package plexus-velocity for the Debian distribution,
but noticed that the source files do not have any license information
within them.
Would it be possible to fix it? Can I help in any way?
Thanks,
Paul
___
Hi Trygve,
Is your maven-ant-helper ready to be uploaded to the new queue now? If
so would you like me to ask Michael if he's available to look at it?
Thanks,
paul
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Wed, June 6, 2007 1:36 pm, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
-maven2 (2.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
+maven2 (2.0.6-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
Why 0.1 and not 1 as the other packages are using?
Just a reminder (to myself as much as anyone else) that it is definitely,
absolutely, postively not
tags 389887 + moreinfo
thanks
Regarding your Debian bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=389887
I am not sure if I understand the problem you are reporting. If you want
to include a Jar on your classpath you must user the filename of the Jar
itself, not just the owning
On Wed, May 30, 2007 8:19 am, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Paul Cager wrote:
Paul Cager wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 10:59 am, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Paul Cager wrote:
By the way, I've hit a few problems with maven-ant-helper. Do you
mind
if I commit a few changes?
Sure, go ahead. We're a team
Paul Cager wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 10:59 am, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Paul Cager wrote:
By the way, I've hit a few problems with maven-ant-helper. Do you mind
if I commit a few changes?
Sure, go ahead. We're a team after all :) Just make sure you apply the
patch I submitted last night
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Numbers of errors with the correct plexus-container-default
(1.0-alpha-9-stable-1) is now 14 and they are all related to Doxia or
plexus component factories.
Do you have an updated package for modello (in particular one that
builds the
I've created a maven2/debian directory in the project's svn. Of course
we are far from being able to compile it, let alone upload a package.
But at least it should gives us something to aim for.
Number of build errors is currently hovering around 50. Watch this space...
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: commons-openpgp
Version : svn 533437
Upstream Author : Brett Porter, Stefan Bodewig
* URL : http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/openpgp/index.html
* License : Apache V2
This happens because the default URL for the help file is /index.html
(in default.properties). This will obviously not work.
I'll attempt to improve the situation when I package the new upstream
version (2.6).
___
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
I found it quite difficult to locate this information on javassh.org's
web site.
The command line required is of the form:
java -jar jta26.jar -plugins Status,Socket,SSH,Terminal hostname 22
(or you can use an equivalent config file).
I'll update the package's description and README when I
EspeonEefi wrote:
reopen 353586
severity 353586 minor
thanks
I can reproduce this error using the attached very simple build.xml and
HelloWorld java program. Indeed, ant by default still automatically
adds /usr/share/ant/lib/ant-bootstrap.jar to the classpath. Note, though
that the
Michael Koch wrote:
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:35:12AM +, Paul Cager wrote:
Currently:
Depends: java-gcj-compat | java-virtual-machine, java-gcj-compat |
java1-runtime | java2-runtime, libxerces2-java
Recommends: ant-optional, jikes | java-compiler
Should ant Depend or Suggest
Currently:
Depends: java-gcj-compat | java-virtual-machine, java-gcj-compat |
java1-runtime | java2-runtime, libxerces2-java
Recommends: ant-optional, jikes | java-compiler
Should ant Depend or Suggest the compiler packages? I'd say Depend, but
I suppose its not an absolute dependency - you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: imagefilters-java
Version : 2.0.235
Upstream Author : Jerry Huxtable
* URL : http://www.jhlabs.com/ip/filters/index.html
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : manipulation and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jtb
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : Wanjun Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] and others
* URL : http://compilers.cs.ucla.edu/jtb/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description : a syntax tree builder for
Hi,
In CVS, bootstrap/javacc.jar has all of the old COM.sun.labs classes
within it (instead of the org.javacc ones). This causes a slight problem
with the packaging of JavaCC I am doing for Debian, as the Sun classes
do not have a free license.
How would people feel if I were to replace CVS's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have imported the tagsoup package into svn. I had created this
package before I became a member of pkg-java, so the version on
packages.debian.org still has me as the maintainer. I've _not_ prepared
a new upload just to fix this, but I have edited
The authors of JavaCC have now re-licensed the JavaCC code under a pure
BSD license (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.html). This
should clear up the doubts some organisations have had regarding the
Nuclear and Weapons clauses in the original license, and the export
restrictions
2006 17:42:28 -0600
From: Tom Marble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul Cager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Simon Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul:
I'm fairly familiar with debian-legal and you are right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've had a look at the new upstream release (4.0), and it's still not
clear if it is DFSG compliant.
The website[1] explicitly states that the license is Berkeley Software
Distribution (BSD) License.
In an answer to a query the author (Sreenivas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Please can I apply to join the Java Packaging Project. I've opened an
account on alioth (paulcager-guest), and I'm subscribed to
pkg-java-maintainers.
A little about myself, by way of introduction...
I work as a Java developer for a big UK
58 matches
Mail list logo
