libnu-htmlparser-java_1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Since this hasn't been re-processed; I'm clearing it. Please re-upload if it's fit for the archive From a year ago, Thorsten left a note: the license of some files says that: You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works of this document. === Please feel free to

Comments regarding snappy-java_1.1.1.6-1_amd64.changes

Howdy maintainer, This is a new upstream release during freeze. Have you talked with the Release Team? Would you like me to reject this so you can retarget experimental? Thanks! Paul __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Comments regarding openjdk-7-jre-dcevm_7u55-1_amd64.changes

Howdy maintainer, E: openjdk-7-jre-dcevm source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package build-depends: hardening-wrapper = use dpkg-buildflags instead Appears valid You should address this. Thanks, Paul __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Howdy maintainer, Your debian/patches are GPL-2. Upstream is apache2. These licenses are not compatable. Please relicense those patches to GPL-3+ or apache2. Thanks, Paul === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload

groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

See other mail === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Comments regarding css2xslfo_1.6.2-1_amd64.changes

Howdy maintainer, Upstream should likely know that LICENCE is in fact spelled LICENSE. In addition, please get upstream to use a sane license. The stuff that's in there now is really troubling, but since you followed up and they claim it's public domain, I'm willing to not reject this. Please

Comments regarding jssc_2.6.0-1_i386.changes

Howdy maintainer, It's mildly concerning to have all these bianries in the source package. I can't tell if they're actually built form the sources in question, but you're rebuilding everything OK in debian/rules. It's make me feel better if they were removed in a DFSG repack, we totally don't

findbugs_2.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Howdy maintainer, I'm sorry, i've had to reject this package, src/antTask/edu/umd/cs/findbugs/anttask/FindBugsTask.java src/gui/edu/umd/cs/findbugs/gui2/CloudCommentsPane.java contains license restrictions that aren't in the copyright. Please fix and reupload Thanks! Paul === Please

doxia-1.0_1.0~alpha-6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Howdy maintainer, Sorry, but I've had to reject this package, doxia-core/src/test/resources/convert/in/sample.c contains:: /* Copyright (c) 1994-1999 Pixware. This file is part of the Pixware xs library. For conditions of distribution and use, see the accompanying legal.txt

janino_2.6.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Howdy! I'm sorry, but I'm REJECT'ing this package - The jar has no sources in it (Is this rebuilt at build-time for the version in the archive? I didn't go through the java helpers carefully enough, I see it shipped) - All the source is stuck in zips. Can we do a DFSG repack that

Comments regarding aspectj-maven-plugin_1.4-1_amd64.changes

Howdy maintainer, The correct DEP5 term for upstream's license is `Expat' not `MIT'. Please also comply with policy 4.9's requirement that get-orig-source can be invoked from anywhere (not just in the package root) It'd be nice to get both of these fixed in the next upload. Cheers, Paul

Comments regarding boilerpipe_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes

Howdy maintainer, You depend on debhelper 8 but only use compat 7. You can likely bump that or drop the dependency. In addition, get-orig-source targets must run anywhere (not just from the package root), so please fix this in your next upload. Thanks! Paul __ This is the maintainer