Bug#372880: eclipse can't start: problem opening page
2006/6/15, Arnaud Vandyck [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Michael Koch wrote: I can't reproduce this here on i386. Can you please make the output of /usr/bin/eclise -debug -consoleLog available? Attached. Note that when I click OK on the error window, everything disapears, but I have to C-c to stop the process (but it's not eating the cpu). Hi Arnaud! Have you tried also cacao or jamvm? I wonder if its an gcj-only problem. Eclipse on ppc with gcj works for me. Have you a special ppc machine? Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#344514: Man page for efj is missing
Here is the link to the Eclipse Bug report for the stand-alone formatter: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=75333 Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#362500: duplicated?
2006/4/24, Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think this is a duplicate of #359979, found here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=359979 Wouldn't it be possible, at least, some kind of NMU? It isn't hard at all to fix... I'll will look later at that issue today or next days. Maybe Matthias knows more about the amd64 issue. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#362500: duplicated?
2006/4/24, Rafael Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As you can see in the provided link, it's just a missing dependency... I just asked Matthias. And he said, that it is already fixed. So, I will see if I can do an upload. The problem is that we have to handle also the transition to gcj-4.1 Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#364368: Build-Dep on mozilla (library), please transition to xulrunner
2006/4/23, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It looks like your package still depends on a mozilla library in testing. As upstream declared mozilla to be dead and moved all functionality that is needed to embed gecko and friends to a new software suite (xulrunner), you should update your package to work with those. At the moment, it looks like we don't want to release etch with mozilla [1]. Yes, it is planned to use xulrunner instead of mozilla. We will make the transition as soon as possible. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#362500: eclipse uninstallable for amd64
2006/4/13, Joel Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: eclipse version 3.1.1-8 is uninstallable on my amd64 box due to the mixed upgrade to 3.1.2-1 in the repository. You are right. I didn't noticed it before.It affects me too, because I use a powerpc, which also not available. @Michael: Do you know what goes wrong? Stephan Michels ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#358594: eclipse binary, desktop/menu things should be in eclipse-platform
2006/3/23, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.2 Forwarded from https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/35871 I have just installed eclipse-platform-gcj on dapper and I have no /usr/bin/eclipse script anywhere on my system. It appears this is supposed to be in the eclipse-platform-common package but it's not. Even though it shouldn't be required, I tried installing the full eclipse package and sure enough /usr/bin/eclipse was hiding there. This is not a viable solution, however, as the eclipse package additionally requires me to install: ant-optional, eclipse-jdt, eclipse-jdt-common, eclipse-pde, eclipse-pde-common, eclipse-source, junit None of which I want to install. It seems that the core eclipse-platform files like /usr/bin/eclipse should either be moved back to eclipse-platform-common or the SDK files (and required dependencies) should be moved back into the eclipse-sdk package as it used to be. The eclipse executeable should be in the eclipse package. eclipse-platform-gcj is not a stand-alone package Through the installation of the eclipse package you ensure that you have everything installed. If you don't install all eclipse packages, then you will have missing dependencies in eclipse if you don't install for example the pde plugins. Eclipse won't work correctly without patching the features. And even if it works with patching of the features, I don't think it's a good idea, because other plugins can depend on the core plugins and then they will missing some plugins. @Michael: I really think its a better idea to a have one package, The current situation caused to much troubles. What do you think? Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#356028: eclipse-ecj is version 3.1.0, not 3.1.2
2006/3/9, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]: if ecj-java works, ecj-java -help still says it's version 3.1.0, not 3.1.2 Hmm, doesn't happen to me: $ ecj-java -help | grep 3.1 testing /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm...Eclipse Java Compiler v_585_R31x, 3.1.2 release, Copyright IBM Corp 2000, 2006. All rights reserved. $ ecj-java -v testing /usr/lib/j2sdk1.4-ibm...Eclipse Java Compiler v_585_R31x, 3.1.2 release, Copyright IBM Corp 2000, 2006. All rights reserved. $ ecj -v Eclipse Java Compiler v_585_R31x, 3.1.2 release, Copyright IBM Corp 2000, 2006. All rights reserved. Does it still occur? Thank you, Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#361696: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: Coarse dependencies
2006/4/9, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please put the Gnome and Mozilla shared libraries into their own binary packages to reduce the coarseness of libswt3.1-gtk-jni's dependencies. If I put the jni libraries into separate packages, then I have to separate the swt java lib too. This is much work and I don't see any benefit I would gain. Moreover swt wasn't design my the eclipse team to be apportionable. Do you see any reason why we should do it? Thank you, Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#352184: eclipse: cannot build from source with firefox support
2006/2/10, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The support for firefox-dev is for Ubuntu. It doenst exist on Debian. That is intentional. We removed the Dependencies on firefox becuase it just doesnt work. We are still investigating this. The only thing that works currently is the mozilla-browser. firefox misses some symbol in its libraries. When this solved we will readd the other browsers. I think we should switch to xulrunner. Using firefox for the browser bindings wasn't very successful and I don't want to install the mozilla browser only because of the browser bindings. Hopefully I can try it later with xulrunner. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#361692: libswt3.1-gtk-jni: Conflicts with libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni
2006/4/9, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unpacking libswt3.1-gtk-jni (from .../libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libswt3.1-gtk-jni_3.1.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/jni/libswt-gnome-gtk-3139.so', which is also in package libswt-gnome-gtk-3.1-jni To have the same swt lib into two different packages was not our intention. It would be good to have one swt lib in the archive, then such things won't occur. Is it possible to merge your swt package with our swt package? Can we resolve the current situation somehow? Thank you, Stephan Michels.. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#356027: eclipse-ecj installation error
2006/3/9, Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED]: $ ecj-java -help cat: /etc/eclipse/java_home: No such file or directory Could not find a suitable JVM. maybe missing dependencies? It's not sure, that /etc/eclipse/java_home exists. Yes, seems so. java_home is installed by the eclipse package, but eclipse-ecj does only depend on eclipse-jdt-eclipse-platform-eclipse-rcp Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#350729: cacao: Incorrect result due to computations in extended precision on x86 (regression)
On 1/31/06, Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the Java specifications, computations must correspond to the IEEE-754 double precision, and the result is incorrect. Package cacao 0.93-4 did not have this problem: z = 9.007199254740994E15 d = 0.0 Thank you for finding this bug. I got a patch from Christian Thalinger and the problem should be fixed in the next upload. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#347749: eclipse-platform-common: allow documented -vmargs for /usr/bin/eclipse
On 1/12/06, Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the current /usr/bin/eclipse script does not allow the -vmargs option. The patch scans for -vmargs and appends the custom options for the native eclipse binary. This way, I can run eclipse -vmargs -Xmx512 for example. Thank you for the patch, should be fix in 3.1.1-9. I fixed also -install, maybe it can be useful in some situations. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#344514: Man page for efj is missing
Package: eclipse-efj Version: 3.1.1-6 Man page for efj is missing. The option -help or similars doesn't work. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#343315: Eclipse man page has no description for the -clean option
tag 343315 + pending On 12/14/05, Aldous D. Penaranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that the eclipse manual page is lacking a description for the -clean option. I'm not very familiar with the current eclipse options as some of them might be missing in the man page too so consider this as a sort of reminder to update the manual page. Okay, I updated the man page with the missing commandline options. Most of them were missing because they are directed to OSGi framework. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#344178: Installing plugins makes eclipse not startup anymore
On 12/21/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 09:02 +0100, Michael Koch wrote: I raise the severity of this bug to important as it is really annoying that its not so easy to install plugins via this mechanism. We will need to take a deep breath and think about a solution for this. I wonder what fedora does in this case. There is something strange going on. Although it is completely repeatable for me locally Stephan cannot repeat it and installing these plugins does work for him. To be honest, I'm not working with gcj all the time. So the problem might depend on gcj. Billy give us a hint where the problem can be: I debugged this problem with pascal before. What's happening is that when you install something with the update manager, it refreshes the set of installed plugins. gcj will sometimes cause the file to be blank, because of some writing failure. When this happens, OSGi things you want to uninstall all plugins, and so it does once they've been uninstalled, you're screwed, it won't be able to resolve anything when you start up again. Stephan Michels ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#344177: eclipse: Eclipse CDT missing
On 12/21/05, Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But there is already two (?) ITP bugs for CDT. No need to file another one. Found only one, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=195236 Michael comitted a cdt package to pkg-java, which is in a pretty good shape. I use it for some time now without problems. So, I think it's ready for an upload. Is there a way I can try out this package? Well, I'm still not happy with the package but lets share it. I will upload to the archive today. I changed some minor bits. So please wait one second because until I have rebuild the package. *I wish I had a faster computer* Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#344177: eclipse: Eclipse CDT missing
On 12/20/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The CDT seems to be missing. Or I might not know which package it is in. I would expect eclipse-cdt, but that package doesn't seem to exist. CDT is not part of the eclipse package. It would be better if you file a RFP(Request for package) against WNPP, but anyway... Michael comitted a cdt package to pkg-java, which is in a pretty good shape. I use it for some time now without problems. So, I think it's ready for an upload. What do you think Michael? ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#344178: Installing plugins makes eclipse not startup anymore
On 12/20/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't try installing these plugins on Debian (eclipse 3.1.1-6) it will seem to install nicely and restart eclipse at first but then on a later startup of eclipse it will complain about Bundle org.eclipse.compare version 3.1.1 has already been installed from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/org.eclipse.compare_3.1.1.jar and The update site has also the plugin org.eclipse.compare_3.1.1.jar, which comes with the eclipse package itself. I wonder why the update site includes the plugin. Maybe for pre-3.1.1 versions of eclipse... org.eclipse.core.runtime.CoreException[1]: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.IDEApplication. If this happens then the fix is to rm -rf ~/.eclipse (this will remove all your settings!). Hmm, I installed both plugins(btw great additions) without problems. Unfortunately, the bugzilla plugin eats all my cpu power if it tries to retrieve the bugzilla data. Better try the -clean option instead of removing the ~/.eclipse folder. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#342338: eclipse-rcp: prerm script fails if directories are not empty
Should be fixed in 3.1.1-7. Thank you for reporting the issue. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#343089: eclipse-platform-common: Eclipse Help: Invalid Links to API Reference
On 12/12/05, Markus Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The links points to help/topic/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/reference/api/overview-summary.html, but this file is not available in eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv_3.1.1/doc.zip/reference/api. Yes, this is known bug of gjdoc and should be fixed in the upstream of gjdoc. Unfortunately gjdoc suffers currently from another bug of gcj and we can't create a new release for it. As soon there is a new release of gjdoc this issue should be fixed. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#343114: eclipse: please, add menu entry for eclipse
There exist a menu entry for Eclipse in Applications/Development/Eclipse . Which Desktop or WindowManager do you use? Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#342341: eclipse: too many unneeded dependencies
On 12/7/05, Erwan David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: eclipse Severity: normal sudo apt-get -u install eclipse Password: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: dbus-1 dbus-glib-1 eclipse-jdt eclipse-jdt-common eclipse-pde eclipse-pde-common eclipse-platform eclipse-platform-common eclipse-rcp eclipse-rcp-common eclipse-source gconf2 gconf2-common gnome-keyring gnome-mime-data junit libbcel-java libbonobo2-0 libbonobo2-common libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common libcommons-beanutils-java libcommons-collections-java libcommons-collections3-java libcommons-dbcp-java libcommons-digester-java libcommons-el-java libcommons-fileupload-java libcommons-launcher-java libcommons-logging-java libcommons-modeler-java libcommons-pool-java libfam0c102 libgconf2-4 libgnome-keyring0 libgnome2-0 libgnome2-common libgnomecanvas2-0 libgnomecanvas2-common libgnomeui-0 libgnomeui-common libgnomevfs2-0 libgnomevfs2-common libhal-storage0 libhal0 libjsch-java liblog4j1.2-java liblucene-java liblucene-java-doc libmx4j-java liborbit2 libregexp-java libscrollkeeper0 libservlet2.4-java libsmbclient libswt3.1-gtk-java libswt3.1-gtk-jni libtomcat5-java mozilla-browser scrollkeeper shared-mime-info zenity Which means 195 MB on disk... eclipse does not need gnome, so there is a dependency problem on this side. Same thing with mozilla-browser. The gnome libraries are needed for SWT, for example org.eclipse.swt.program.Program to get informations about the mine type and icons etc. for a given file. It seems that the SWT libraries handle the case if the gnome libs doesn't exist properly. But I don't think it's a good idea to remove the dependencies. Maybe a solution is to use recommendations instead. And the dependency to mozila-broser is needed for the SWT Browser widget. You should be able to use firefox instead, but nevertheless a browser is needed. In any case this makes the package uninstallable here (no gnome). Sad to hear, but to be honest if you can't spare 195 MB of diskspace then you won't have much fun with Eclipse. I tend to tag the report as WONTFIX, but wait on an opinion from Michael Koch. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#342695: eclipse: debian/copyright file doesn't seem to be accurate anymore
On 12/9/05, Francesco Poli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: According to the package debian/copyright file, Eclipse seems to be released under the CPL. But eclipse.org website states that, from version 3.1 on, Eclipse has completed the migration[1] from the CPL to the EPL[2]. [1] http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl2epl/ [2] http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-v10.html IIUC, you should update the debian/copyright file accordingly. Thank you for reporting this. Should be fixed in 3.1.1-7 Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#342789: eclipse: Eclipse crashes at startup
Can you please try to execute eclipse with the -clean argument? ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#342789: eclipse: Eclipse crashes at startup
On 12/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Stephan Michels [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can you please try to execute eclipse with the -clean argument? Thanks for your quick answer. Same problem with eclipse -clean : Can you please send the list of eclipse packages you have installed with dpkg -l | grep eclipse Thank you, Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#342305: eclipse: today installation erase all data in /usr/local/lib
On 12/7/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Have you upgraded other packages recently that could have been to | blame for removing /usr/local/lib? In fact, the symbolic link /usr/local was delete and only eclipse stuff was in it. Well, there's no code that I can see in eclipse that would touch a /usr/local symlink. eclipse-rcp.prerm should remove only /usr/local/lib/eclipse if it's empty, just like the python package. Before /usr/local/lib/eclipse was part of eclipse-platform.dirs, which wasn't good. Maybe the conversion was guilty for the lost of your /usr/local/lib/eclipse directory. But /usr/local/lib or /usr/local should be touched. I can't replay it to give you more informations: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# LANG=C apt-get install --reinstall eclipse-rcp Reading package lists... 0% Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 86 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/19.1kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 364668 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace eclipse-rcp 3.1.1-6 (using .../eclipse-rcp_3.1.1-6_i386.deb) ... dpkg: warning - old pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/eclipse-rcp_3.1.1-6_i386.deb (--unpack): ~ subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: ~ /var/cache/apt/archives/eclipse-rcp_3.1.1-6_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Heh, now that's a bug I can confirm; the prerm will fail because it calls rmdir on directories that may not be empty, and doesn't trap the errors. I will look at it, thanks. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#254535: eclipse: Conflict with plugins directory
On 11/28/05, Mateusz Kaduk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.1-5 Followup-For: Bug #254535 Plugin's perspective doesnt work What do you mean with doesn't work? Not available? Error message in the error log view? , eclipse dont recognize plugins directory with installed plugins in home directory. Probably conflict with directory from package. Works for me. Which plugins did you downloaded? Do you get a error message? What conflicts? Downloading additional plugins from update site takes hours! Which JVM do you used? If you used gcj have you also tested Sun's or IBM's vm? ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#335242: /usr/local/lib/eclipse
I added a postinst and prerm script to eclipse-platform, which creates directories for /usr/local/lib/eclipse(/plugins,/features) and chown them to root:staff and chmod to 2775, just like the scripts of python2.(3,4). The changes will be included in 3.1.1-5 $ ls -la /usr/local/lib/eclipse/ insgesamt 16 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 . drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 .. drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 features drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 2005-11-09 15:33 plugins For the sym link within /usr/local/lib/eclipse I'm not sure if it is a good idea, Thank you, Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#338209: Errors in product configuration wizard
Package: eclipse-sdk Version: 3.1.1-3 The product configuration wizard reachable over Help/Software Updates/Manage configuration shows an error for Eclipse project SDK 3.1.1 I get following errors in properties/status: Included feature Eclipse Platform version 3.1.1 contains problems. Included feature org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1 is missing. Included feature org.eclipse.jdt.source_3.1.1 is missing. Included feature org.eclipse.pde.source_3.1.1 is missing. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#336453: eclipse-platform: feature.xml cannot be found
Okay, should be fixed in the next release. $ dpkg -L eclipse-source | grep features/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1/feature.xml /usr/lib/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1/feature.xml /usr/share/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.platform.source_3.1.1/feature.xml Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#336338: eclipse doesn't start
Do you have libswt3.1-gtk-java and libswt3.1-gtk-jni with the version 3.1.1-3 installed? Do following sym. link exist? $ ls -la /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.ppc_3.1.1.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 2005-10-30 12:44 /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.ppc_3.1.1.jar - ../../../share/java/swt-gtk-3.1.jar Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#336389: eclipse-sdk: crashes on startup
On 10/30/05, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: eclipse-sdk Version: 3.1.1-3 Severity: normal I've just installed eclipse-sdk $ eclipse searching for compatible vm... testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj...found and boom. I'm attaching the error log. !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 2005-10-30 01:25:07.545 !MESSAGE Bundle [EMAIL PROTECTED]/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.ppc_3.1.1.jar [65] was not resolved. Looks like the same as #336338. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
Bug#336285: libswt3.1-gtk-java: Please change dependency for mozilla-browser
On 10/29/05, Michael Bergbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: libswt3.1-gtk-java depends on mozilla-browser. In case you've installed firefox, you'll need to additionally install another browser. Isn't it possible to change the dependency so that other web browsers that are already installed also fullful the depency? Should be fixed in the next release, so that you can use Firefox instead of the mozilla-browser. Stephan Michels. ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
