Processed: re: jscommunicator fails to build from source
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 743707 by 734011 Bug #743707 [libclosure-compiler-java] jscommunicator fails to build from source 743707 was not blocked by any bugs. 743707 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 743707: 734011 tags 743707 +confirmed Bug #743707 [libclosure-compiler-java] jscommunicator fails to build from source Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 743707: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743707 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: groovy: makes xbmc FTBFS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 744330 + confirmed Bug #744330 [groovy] groovy: makes xbmc FTBFS Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 744330: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=744330 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: svnkit is marked for autoremoval from testing
Processing control commands: tags -1 patch Bug #735763 [src:svnkit] svnkit: FTBFS: [javac] /«BUILDDIR»/svnkit-1.7.5+dfsg/svnkit-javahl16/src/main/java/org/apache/subversion/javahl/SVNClient.java:32: error: SVNClient is not abstract and does not override abstract method propertyGet(String,String,Revision,Revision,CollectionString) in ISVNClient Added tag(s) patch. -- 735763: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735763 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: svnkit is marked for autoremoval from testing
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 04:40:59AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote: svnkit 1.7.5+dfsg-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-04-29 It is affected by these RC bugs: 735763: svnkit: FTBFS: [javac] /??BUILDDIR??/svnkit-1.7.5+dfsg/svnkit-javahl16/src/main/java/org/apache/subversion/javahl/SVNClient.java:32: error: SVNClient is not abstract and does not override abstract method propertyGet(String,String,Revision,Revision,CollectionString) in ISVNClient Given this notification, I'll take care of this bug. I think the solution to this is to package a new upstream release, however upstream switched SVNKit building process to Gradle. What worries me about this is not SVNKit but current Gradle state in Debian. I would like to improve Gradle, but in my experience the maintenance of that package is not trivial and requires lots and lots of time that I currently don't have. Help with this is more than welcome, of course. -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=4CB7FE1E280ECC90F29A597E6E608B637D8967E9 Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#743131: FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 743131 + patch jessie sid Bug #743131 [glpk-java] FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk Added tag(s) sid, jessie, and patch. clone 743131 -1 Bug #743131 [glpk-java] FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk Bug 743131 cloned as bug 743234 reassign -1 src:eclipse-cdt Bug #743234 [glpk-java] FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk Bug reassigned from package 'glpk-java' to 'src:eclipse-cdt'. No longer marked as found in versions 1.0.32-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #743234 to the same values previously set found -1 eclipse-cdt/8.3.0-1 Bug #743234 [src:eclipse-cdt] FTBFS if default-jdk is gcj-jdk Marked as found in versions eclipse-cdt/8.3.0-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 743131: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743131 743234: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743234 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk
Processing control commands: tags 742405 + patch Bug #742405 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: ftbfs when gcj is default jdk Added tag(s) patch. -- 742405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742405 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#742405: zookeeper ftbfs without openjdk
Processing control commands: tags 742405 + patch Bug #742405 [src:zookeeper] zookeeper: ftbfs when gcj is default jdk Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #742405 to the same tags previously set -- 742405: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742405 742544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742544 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Updates to java-package for armhf architecture
Updated patch
2014-03-22 11:29 GMT+04:00 kay kay.d...@gmail.com:
New java is out for ARM platform. Here is the patch for armhf architecture.
I've just tested it on my Cubieboard.
java -version
java version 1.8.0
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-b132)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 25.0-b70, mixed mode)
--- /usr/share/java-package/oracle-jdk.sh.orig 2014-03-22 11:00:02.597960768 +0400
+++ /usr/share/java-package/oracle-jdk.sh 2014-03-22 10:59:01.187887952 +0400
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
j2se_release=0
# Update or GA release (jdk-7u15-linux-i586.tar.gz)
- if [[ $archive_name =~ jdk-([0-9]+)(u([0-9]+))?-linux-(i586|x64|amd64)\.(bin|tar\.gz) ]]
+ if [[ $archive_name =~ jdk-([0-9]+)(u([0-9]+))?-linux-(i586|x64|amd64|arm-vfp-hflt)\.(bin|tar\.gz) ]]
then
j2se_release=${BASH_REMATCH[1]}
j2se_update=${BASH_REMATCH[3]}
--- /usr/share/java-package/jdk.sh.orig 2014-03-22 11:15:40.049228425 +0400
+++ /usr/share/java-package/jdk.sh 2014-03-22 11:24:59.029997008 +0400
@@ -4,11 +4,6 @@
java_browser_plugin=java-browser-plugin,
depends=\${shlibs:Depends}
if [ ${DEB_BUILD_ARCH:0:3} = arm ]; then
-# ARM is only softfloat ATM so if building on armhf
-# force the dependencies to pickup cross platform fu
-if [ ${DEB_BUILD_ARCH} == armhf ]; then
-depends=libc6-armel, libsfgcc1, libsfstdc++6
-fi
# No browser on ARM yet
java_browser_plugin=
fi
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Updates to java-package for armhf architecture
Hi Kay, Thank you for the patch. I believe this has already been reported in #724455. The patch has been applied on alioth if you want to give it a try. This fix will be included in the version 0.54. git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-java/java-package.git Also note that pkg-java-maintainers is a list dedicated to automatic mail notification. Actual discussions are on debian-j...@lists.debian.org Emmanuel Bourg __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: libspring-java: Multiple security issues
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: owner 741604 ! Bug #741604 [libspring-java] libspring-java: Multiple security issues Owner recorded as Miguel Landaeta nomad...@debian.org. tags 741604 + confirmed Bug #741604 [libspring-java] libspring-java: Multiple security issues Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 741604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741604 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: tomcat7_7.0.52-1~bpo70+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Miguel, It looks like you forgot the -v flag when building. Can you retry with this command please: debuild -sa -v7.0.28-4 Emmanuel Bourg Le 16/03/2014 11:00, Alexander Wirt a écrit : changes since stable missing in changes file. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: tomcat7_7.0.52-1~bpo70+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 01:11:07PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Hi Miguel, It looks like you forgot the -v flag when building. Can you retry with this command please: debuild -sa -v7.0.28-4 Hi Emmanuel, That's right, it's now I noticed I forgot to pass those flags to cowbuilder. I uploaded it again. Sorry for the additional delay with this. Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=4CB7FE1E280ECC90F29A597E6E608B637D8967E9 Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Backporting zookeeper
Hi Tim, Le 07/03/2014 13:56, Tim Retout a écrit : I would like to prepare a backport of zookeeper to wheezy-backports. I've prepared and tested a diff for this, and no special changes are needed. Should I aim to get a branch/tags created in the git repo? Just create a wheezy-backports branch in the Git repository: https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/pkg-java/zookeeper.git You'll need write access to pkg-java, you can request it here: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-java Emmanuel Bourg __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Backporting zookeeper
On 7 March 2014 13:00, Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org wrote: Just create a wheezy-backports branch in the Git repository: https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/pkg-java/zookeeper.git You'll need write access to pkg-java, you can request it here: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-java Thank you, I have requested it. -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: [Debichem-devel] Jmol: Seeking new maintainer or considering removal
Hi, On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 07:10:44PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: Jmol is a nice and useful 3D chemical structures viewer application, which is written in Java. It can be run as a standalone application and it also ships an interactive web browser applet and a Java development tollkit. Since some time the Jmol package is lacking behind the latest upstream releases. Current version in Debian is 12.X whereas upstream already reached 14.X. With the release of the 13.X series, Jmol added some more external libraries, which it uses and ships. So to get the latest Jmol release into Debian/main a maintainer is required, who is willing to maintain Jmol along with its dependencies. This requires some basic Java knowledge. Also note, that the upstream build system (the last time I checked) usually puts all classes - Jmol and its dependencies - into one JAR file, so you usually have to hack the build system too. If nobody steps up, I'm going to request its removal from Debian, as it seems unuseful to me, to ship an outdated piece of software. If somebody wants to step up to help, be my guest. Note that I believe there is/will be a Javascript version of Jmol at one point, which might make some thing easier, not sure. In any case, I plan to update it in time for the jessie freeze at least, but I currently don't have a lot of time to dedicate to it. Michael __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: sweethome3d backport
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda l...@alaxarxa.net wrote: I would like to ask if it would be possible to build a backport of sweethome3d for wheezy. sweethome3d 4.3 has just been uploaded to wheezy-backports. See http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ -- G..e __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: sweethome3d backport
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda l...@alaxarxa.net wrote: A Dilluns, 3 de març de 2014, Gabriele Giacone va escriure: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda l...@alaxarxa.net wrote: I would like to ask if it would be possible to build a backport of sweethome3d for wheezy. sweethome3d 4.3 has just been uploaded to wheezy-backports. See http://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ just my curiosity, where do you uploaded it? Because in: https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html there's no sweethome3d. It's been uploaded a week ago, it's now in archive http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d/ -- G..e __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding relaxngcc_1.12-1_amd64.changes
On 19.02.2014 00:57, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 18.02.2014 23:35, Florian Weimer wrote: * Timo Aaltonen: We have a bootstrapping issue with this.. upstream CVS repo ships with 'lib/bootstrap-relaxngcc.jar' which is used to generate the files for the parser. And since the source tarball can't include that relaxngcc has no way to enter Debian? Fedora doesn't seem to care, they used to have a version where it used the embedded jar file, but the one that entered the archive used the same build system as our original upload.. sending to debian-java too in case someone has ideas.. Just use a cyclic build dependency. They are annoying, but less problematic for Arch: all packages. How would that work in practice? Ship the generated files in the tarball and document the build in README.source? Or try to build a stripped version that's capable of generating the parser as a second stage? Benjamin explained this to me.. but instead of fiddling this manually, we went with the original tarball but that the pre-generated files are rebuilt before the final jar is built. That should be good enough for the archive, no? -- t __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#739591: libclosure-compiler-java: libguava-java dependency needs to be versioned
Control: reassign -1 src:closure-compiler 20130227+dfsg1-4 On Jo, 20 feb 14, 16:50:08, Paul Wise wrote: Source: libclosure-compiler-java Version: 20130227+dfsg1-4 Severity: normal I tried to run libclosure-compiler-java from jessie with libguava-java from wheezy but I got this error. After upgrading libguava-java to the jessie version the crash no longer happens. Please change the libguava-java dependency to (= 15.0), according to these links that is the needed version right now: https://code.google.com/p/closure-compiler/source/browse/lib/guava.jar?name=v20140110 https://github.com/michaelklishin/urly/issues/8 java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com.google.common.io.ByteStreams.limit(Ljava/io/InputStream;J)Ljava/io/InputStream; at com.google.javascript.jscomp.CommandLineRunner.getDefaultExterns(CommandLineRunner.java:943) at com.google.javascript.jscomp.CommandLineRunner.createExterns(CommandLineRunner.java:868) at com.google.javascript.jscomp.AbstractCommandLineRunner.doRun(AbstractCommandLineRunner.java:739) at com.google.javascript.jscomp.AbstractCommandLineRunner.run(AbstractCommandLineRunner.java:380) at com.google.javascript.jscomp.CommandLineRunner.main(CommandLineRunner.java:980) -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#739591: libclosure-compiler-java: libguava-java dependency needs to be versioned
Processing control commands: reassign -1 src:closure-compiler 20130227+dfsg1-4 Bug #739591 [src:libclosure-compiler-java] libclosure-compiler-java: libguava-java dependency needs to be versioned Warning: Unknown package 'src:libclosure-compiler-java' Bug reassigned from package 'src:libclosure-compiler-java' to 'src:closure-compiler'. No longer marked as found in versions libclosure-compiler-java/20130227+dfsg1-4. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #739591 to the same values previously set Bug #739591 [src:closure-compiler] libclosure-compiler-java: libguava-java dependency needs to be versioned Marked as found in versions closure-compiler/20130227+dfsg1-4. -- 739591: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739591 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding relaxngcc_1.12-1_amd64.changes
On 28.01.2014 15:24, Gergely Nagy wrote: On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 22.01.2014 15:56, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 22.01.2014 15:21, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 21.01.2014 14:44, Gergely Nagy wrote: - There are a couple of files in the source that have comments like: /* this file is generated by RelaxNGCC */ Are these files rebuildable? (Sadly, my Java build system knowledge is not enough to determine this on my own) Not sure, no idea where they were generated from.. I'll see if they are needed at all. I could remove all of them without any issues, so best to recreate the tarball and push to NEW again, with all the fixes. scratch that, removing those trims the resulting .jar too and breaks at least JAXB build.. Well, we need all files to be rebuildable, all generated files need their source, and we need at least documentation on how to rebuild them, even if they aren't rebuilt on every build. I'm afraid I'll have to reject the package in the current state, until this issue is solved. (The other things would be fine in a -2 version, but not this one). We have a bootstrapping issue with this.. upstream CVS repo ships with 'lib/bootstrap-relaxngcc.jar' which is used to generate the files for the parser. And since the source tarball can't include that relaxngcc has no way to enter Debian? Fedora doesn't seem to care, they used to have a version where it used the embedded jar file, but the one that entered the archive used the same build system as our original upload.. -- t __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding relaxngcc_1.12-1_amd64.changes
On 18.02.2014 23:16, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 28.01.2014 15:24, Gergely Nagy wrote: On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 22.01.2014 15:56, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 22.01.2014 15:21, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 21.01.2014 14:44, Gergely Nagy wrote: - There are a couple of files in the source that have comments like: /* this file is generated by RelaxNGCC */ Are these files rebuildable? (Sadly, my Java build system knowledge is not enough to determine this on my own) Not sure, no idea where they were generated from.. I'll see if they are needed at all. I could remove all of them without any issues, so best to recreate the tarball and push to NEW again, with all the fixes. scratch that, removing those trims the resulting .jar too and breaks at least JAXB build.. Well, we need all files to be rebuildable, all generated files need their source, and we need at least documentation on how to rebuild them, even if they aren't rebuilt on every build. I'm afraid I'll have to reject the package in the current state, until this issue is solved. (The other things would be fine in a -2 version, but not this one). We have a bootstrapping issue with this.. upstream CVS repo ships with 'lib/bootstrap-relaxngcc.jar' which is used to generate the files for the parser. And since the source tarball can't include that relaxngcc has no way to enter Debian? Fedora doesn't seem to care, they used to have a version where it used the embedded jar file, but the one that entered the archive used the same build system as our original upload.. sending to debian-java too in case someone has ideas.. this is a blocker for xsom - fastinfoset - jaxb - RESTEasy - Dogtag 10 - FreeIPA :/ -- t __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding relaxngcc_1.12-1_amd64.changes
* Timo Aaltonen: We have a bootstrapping issue with this.. upstream CVS repo ships with 'lib/bootstrap-relaxngcc.jar' which is used to generate the files for the parser. And since the source tarball can't include that relaxngcc has no way to enter Debian? Fedora doesn't seem to care, they used to have a version where it used the embedded jar file, but the one that entered the archive used the same build system as our original upload.. sending to debian-java too in case someone has ideas.. Just use a cyclic build dependency. They are annoying, but less problematic for Arch: all packages. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding relaxngcc_1.12-1_amd64.changes
On 18.02.2014 23:35, Florian Weimer wrote: * Timo Aaltonen: We have a bootstrapping issue with this.. upstream CVS repo ships with 'lib/bootstrap-relaxngcc.jar' which is used to generate the files for the parser. And since the source tarball can't include that relaxngcc has no way to enter Debian? Fedora doesn't seem to care, they used to have a version where it used the embedded jar file, but the one that entered the archive used the same build system as our original upload.. sending to debian-java too in case someone has ideas.. Just use a cyclic build dependency. They are annoying, but less problematic for Arch: all packages. How would that work in practice? Ship the generated files in the tarball and document the build in README.source? Or try to build a stripped version that's capable of generating the parser as a second stage? -- t __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#738789: libhamcrest-java: FTBFS: bad class file: hamcrest-core-1.3.jar(org/hamcrest/Description.class)
On 02/16/2014 08:32 PM, Daniel Schepler wrote: On Sunday, February 16, 2014 11:54:12 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Hi Daniel, I haven't been able to reproduce this issue, libhamcrest-java builds fine with pbuilder. Are you sure your build environment is clean? It looks like this is one of those bugs that's not reproducible 100% of the time. I just tried it 5 times using my pbuilder environment, and it failed on 2 of those builds. I saw this failure once last week when Daniel first reported it, in a sid cowbuilder chroot, and then not since (in 5 subsequent builds). So it's a bit odd... I didn't save the build logs from the failed build, since I thought the failure would be trivially reproducible. That doesn't much help isolate the issue, but it is occurring on multiple systems. tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: re-assign submitter of my bugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 681691 !
Bug #681691 [os-prober] os-prober and linux-boot-prober fail to mount alternate
partition
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 729742 !
Bug #729742 [blinken] blinken: Fails to produce sounds
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 541844 !
Bug #541844 [aptitude] aptitude: Missing obvious dependency resolution of wine
Bug #511366 [aptitude] full-upgrade requires its piece of meat
Bug #574928 [aptitude] aptitude: suggests to downgrade package instead of
keeping current version on full-upgrade
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 558366 !
Bug #558366 [gcompris] gcompris: reading/click_on_letter doesnt have sound in
French
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 575672 !
Bug #575672 [kde-standard] kde-standard: should depend on or recommend
system-config-printer-kde
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 575691 !
Bug #575691 [childsplay-alphabet-sounds-fr] childsplay-alphabet-sounds-fr:
Incoherent vocal descriptions and pictures in French version of flashcard
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 622960 !
Bug #622960 [wnpp] ITA: freemind -- Java Program for creating and viewing
Owner changed from Willem van den Akker wvdak...@wilsoft.nl to Eric L.
ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 648523 !
Bug #648523 [kdm] kdm: KDM looses keyboard and mouse if restarted while on
console
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 668146 !
Bug #668146 [openjdk-6-jre] openjdk-6-jre:i386: SIGSEGV on libdbus
dbus_set_error
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 674692 !
Bug #674692 [libnepomuk4] libnepomuk4: Nepomuk complains about missing virtuoso
server resp. virtuoso soprano plugin
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 685533 !
Bug #685533 [keepassx] keepassx: Sort on last update date is buggy
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 691367 !
Bug #691367 [xsane] xsane: E-mail is sent with incorrect charset
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 701578 !
Bug #701578 [nodm] nodm doesn't start after hibernate but doesn't complain
either
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 704259 !
Bug #704259 [vdr-plugin-xineliboutput] vdr-plugin-xineliboutput: VDR tends to
crash when stopping playing an internet radio
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 720675 !
Bug #720675 [kipi-plugins] kipi-plugins: Export to HTML doesn't use selected
search but current view
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 648521 !
Bug #648521 [kdelibs-bin] kdelibs-bin: Login fails once from two times in
alternance
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 731041 !
Bug #731041 [udisks2] plasma-widgets-workspace: device notifier reacts to
inserted removable medias only after action on it.
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 657714 !
Bug #657714 [grep] grep: dmesg reports that grep uses deprecated ipv6 sysctl
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 686930 !
Bug #686930 [plasma-widgets-workspace] plasma-widgets-workspace: Task Manager
widget looses iceweasel from time to time
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 691596 !
Bug #691596 [sqlite3-doc] sqlite3-doc: Register to doc-base
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 704254 !
Bug #704254 [xineliboutput-sxfe] xineliboutput-sxfe: vdr-sxfe fails if VDR
isn't running or restarted
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 661335 !
Bug #661335 [src:linux] [3.1.8-3.2.4 regression] Cougar Point: all HDMI
outputs silent
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 661319 !
Bug #661319 [vdr-plugin-xineliboutput] vdr-plugin-xineliboutput: plugin fails
to play DVDs with missing /dev/dvd
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 656890 !
Bug #656890 [libxine1-misc-plugins] xineliboutput-sxfe: crashes when trying to
see images
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
owner 735892 !
Bug #735892 {Done: tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org}
[libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java] libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java:
doesn't depend on default-jre and enforces installation of version 6 openjdk
Owner recorded as Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de.
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
511366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=511366
541844: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=541844
558366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558366
574928:
Processed: re-assign submitter of my bugs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: submitter 681691 ! Bug #681691 [os-prober] os-prober and linux-boot-prober fail to mount alternate partition Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 729742 ! Bug #729742 [blinken] blinken: Fails to produce sounds Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 541844 ! Bug #541844 [aptitude] aptitude: Missing obvious dependency resolution of wine Bug #511366 [aptitude] full-upgrade requires its piece of meat Bug #574928 [aptitude] aptitude: suggests to downgrade package instead of keeping current version on full-upgrade Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 558366 ! Bug #558366 [gcompris] gcompris: reading/click_on_letter doesnt have sound in French Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 575672 ! Bug #575672 [kde-standard] kde-standard: should depend on or recommend system-config-printer-kde Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 575691 ! Bug #575691 [childsplay-alphabet-sounds-fr] childsplay-alphabet-sounds-fr: Incoherent vocal descriptions and pictures in French version of flashcard Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 622960 ! Bug #622960 [wnpp] ITA: freemind -- Java Program for creating and viewing Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 648523 ! Bug #648523 [kdm] kdm: KDM looses keyboard and mouse if restarted while on console Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 668146 ! Bug #668146 [openjdk-6-jre] openjdk-6-jre:i386: SIGSEGV on libdbus dbus_set_error Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 674692 ! Bug #674692 [libnepomuk4] libnepomuk4: Nepomuk complains about missing virtuoso server resp. virtuoso soprano plugin Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 685533 ! Bug #685533 [keepassx] keepassx: Sort on last update date is buggy Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 691367 ! Bug #691367 [xsane] xsane: E-mail is sent with incorrect charset Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 701578 ! Bug #701578 [nodm] nodm doesn't start after hibernate but doesn't complain either Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 704259 ! Bug #704259 [vdr-plugin-xineliboutput] vdr-plugin-xineliboutput: VDR tends to crash when stopping playing an internet radio Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 720675 ! Bug #720675 [kipi-plugins] kipi-plugins: Export to HTML doesn't use selected search but current view Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 648521 ! Bug #648521 [kdelibs-bin] kdelibs-bin: Login fails once from two times in alternance Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 731041 ! Bug #731041 [udisks2] plasma-widgets-workspace: device notifier reacts to inserted removable medias only after action on it. Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 657714 ! Bug #657714 [grep] grep: dmesg reports that grep uses deprecated ipv6 sysctl Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 686930 ! Bug #686930 [plasma-widgets-workspace] plasma-widgets-workspace: Task Manager widget looses iceweasel from time to time Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 691596 ! Bug #691596 [sqlite3-doc] sqlite3-doc: Register to doc-base Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de' submitter 704254 ! Bug #704254 [xineliboutput-sxfe] xineliboutput-sxfe: vdr-sxfe fails if VDR isn't running or restarted Changed Bug submitter to 'Eric L. ewl+debian+nospam2...@lavar.de' from 'Eric Lavarde bugs.debian.nos...@lavar.de'
Re: sisu-guice_3.1.9+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
On 2014-02-12 07:33, Debian FTP Masters wrote: libsisu-guice-java_3.1.9+dfsg-2_all.deb: Built-Using refers to non-existing source package libasm3-java (= 3.3.2-2) [...] You have to use source packages (i.e. asm3 instead of libasm3-java) in Built-Using. ~Niels __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: sisu-guice_3.1.9+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED
On 02/11/2014 10:56 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2014-02-12 07:33, Debian FTP Masters wrote: libsisu-guice-java_3.1.9+dfsg-2_all.deb: Built-Using refers to non-existing source package libasm3-java (= 3.3.2-2) [...] You have to use source packages (i.e. asm3 instead of libasm3-java) in Built-Using. ~Niels Thanks Niels. I realized that when I got the bounce and uploaded a new version just a bit ago. It's clear in Policy, but I had binary package on the brain (since jarjar is actually incorporating the binary package). Also, I'm a bit confused as to why my upload of cglib about 30 minutes prior didn't bounce for the same reason. I'm preparing another upload of that now, but it's odd that I didn't get a reject. Thanks, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: debian/copyright GFDL, problems in stable
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 709492 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #709492 {Done: Paolo Greppi paolo.gre...@libpf.com} [src:numdiff] Numdiff
doc is non free
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 709500 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #709500 [src:tla] Documentation is non free
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 709498 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #709498 [smbc] Documentation is non free
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 709497 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #709497 {Done: Cédric Boutillier bou...@debian.org} [src:ruby-gsl]
[src:ruby-gsl] Documentation is non free
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 709495 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #709495 [polyorb] Documentation is non free
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 709494 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #709494 {Done: Sebastien Delafond s...@debian.org} [org-mode]
Documentation is under gfdl with invariants
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 709491 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #709491 [src:ntfsdoc] NTFS doc is non free due to gfdl invariant
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708969 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708969 {Done: Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos eftax...@otenet.gr} [src:mathgl]
[mathgl] Non free GFDL
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708966 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708966 [libmatheval] GFDL non free documentation
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708956 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708956 [jwhois] [jwhois] GFDL non free license
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708955 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708955 [imview-doc] GFDL Problem
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708947 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708947 [horae] [horae] GFDL problem
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708946 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708946 [src:grub] GFDL documentation with front and back cover
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708942 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708942 {Done: Nicolas Boulenguez nico...@debian.org} [gprbuild]
[gprbuild] GFDL non free file with front cover
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708885 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708885 [gnade] [gnade] GFDL problem with invariant section
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708880 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708880 [gengetopt] Manual pages have GFDL problem (no invariant)
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708878 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708878 {Done: Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org} [src:gcc-h8300-hms]
Still some problem with GFDL with backcover/frontcover
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708873 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708873 {Done: Jakub Adam jakub.a...@ktknet.cz} [src:eclipse-linuxtools]
GFDL invariant
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708863 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708863 [src:dico] GFDL with invariant section
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 695717 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #695717 {Done: Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org} [src:cpio]
cpio: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)
Bug #704121 {Done: Anibal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org} [src:cpio]
Debian cpio info pages totally gone
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 708781 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #708781 [autoconf2.64] GFDL license with invariant section
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
695717: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695717
704121: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704121
708781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708781
708863: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708863
708873: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708873
708878: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708878
708880: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708880
708885: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708885
708942: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708942
708946: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708946
708947: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708947
708955: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708955
708956: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708956
708966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708966
708969: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708969
709491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709491
709492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709492
709494: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709494
709495: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709495
709497: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709497
709498: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709498
709500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709500
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#737988:
Processing control commands: tags -1 patch Bug #737988 [libcommons-fileupload-java] Cannot build package Added tag(s) patch. severity -1 wishlist Bug #737988 [libcommons-fileupload-java] Cannot build package Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious' -- 737988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737988 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#735347: Sourceless file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 735347 + wheezy-ignore Bug #735347 [src:bacula-doc] Sourceless file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 735355 + wheezy-ignore Bug #735355 [src:chromium-browser] Sourceless file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 735941 + wheezy-ignore Bug #735941 [src:fckeditor] Sourceless file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 735500 + wheezy-ignore Bug #735500 [src:controlaula] Sourceless file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 737457 + wheezy-ignore Bug #737457 [src:pnp4nagios] [src:pnp4nagios] Sourceless file (minified) (jquery) Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 737442 + wheezy-ignore Bug #737442 [src:netbeans] [src:netbeans] Sourceless file (minified) (jquery) Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 737434 + wheezy-ignore Bug #737434 [src:libmojomojo-perl] [src:libmojomojo-perl] Sourceless file (minified) Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 737433 + wheezy-ignore Bug #737433 [src:ploticus-doc] [src:ploticus-do] Sourceless flash file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 736806 + wheezy-ignore Bug #736806 [src:lcms] [src:lcms] Non free file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 736799 + wheezy-ignore Bug #736799 [src:libdata-amf-perl] [src:libdata-amf-perl] Sourceless flash file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 736795 + wheezy-ignore Bug #736795 [src:knowledgeroot] [src:knowledgeroot] Sourceless flash file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 736794 + wheezy-ignore Bug #736794 [src:jpoker] [src:jpoker] Sourceless flash file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 736788 + wheezy-ignore Bug #736788 [vlc] [src:vlc] Sourceless file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 736787 + wheezy-ignore Bug #736787 [vagrant] [src:vagrand] Sourceless file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 736722 + wheezy-ignore Bug #736722 [src:hyde] [src:hyde] Sourceless file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. tags 735350 + wheezy-ignore Bug #735350 [src:boost1.49] Sourceless file Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. # there are still some left... thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 735347: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735347 735350: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735350 735355: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735355 735500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735500 735941: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735941 736722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736722 736787: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736787 736788: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736788 736794: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736794 736795: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736795 736799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736799 736806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736806 737433: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737433 737434: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737434 737442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737442 737457: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737457 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: more sourceless but distributable files in wheezy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 735895 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735895 [otrs2] [otrs2] Multiple violation of dfsg
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735498 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735498 [src:cronometer] Non free icons
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735342 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735342 {Done: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org} [src:cimg] Non free donate
project button
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735341 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735341 {Done: Stéphane Glondu glo...@debian.org} [src:camlp5] Non free
w3m valid icons
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735337 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735337 [src:boost1.49] Non free w3m valid icons
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735238 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735238 {Done: Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu} [xbmc] [xbmc] Could
not get source of some compiled file
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735237 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735237 [python-weberror] [python-weberror] non sourced minified javascript
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735229 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735229 {Done: Scott Howard show...@debian.org} [arduino] [arduino] Lack
of source for libraries/Bridge/examples/TemperatureWebPanel/www/zepto.min.js
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735234 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735234 [icedove] [icedove] Non sourced min.js
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735227 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735227 [activemq] [activemq] Non sourced jquery
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735121 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735121 {Done: Yann Dirson dir...@debian.org} [tulip] [tulip] Non free
files
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735120 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735120 [postfix-cluebringer] [postfix-cluebringer] Non free file
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 735119 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #735119 [icedove] [icedove] Non free file
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 734855 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #734855 {Done: Denis Barbier barb...@debian.org} [openturns] package
maybe nonfree
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 734800 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #734800 [imagemagick] [imagemagick] Few non free files
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 734276 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #734276 {Done: Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org} [otrs2] [otrs2] Non
free file
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 733285 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #733285 [src:root-system] root-system: contains non-free fonts
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 728414 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #728414 [gsoap] gsoap: Contains non-free XSD files
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 723103 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #723103 [dieharder] dieharder: non-free due to $beverage clause?
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 722979 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #722979 {Done: Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org} [petsc] debian/copyright
issues, sourceless pdf in source
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 722265 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #722265 [mako] mako contains some minified javascript librairies
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 721925 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #721925 {Done: Eugene Zhukov jevgeni...@gmail.com} [saxonb] saxonb is not
free
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 724943 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #724943 {Done: Phil Brooke p...@debian.org} [moria] [moria] Non free file
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
tags 724941 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #724941 [uif2iso] Non free src/idea.c
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
# the following 3 bugs are not to be wheezy-ignored
# but as I was looking at them... I noticed:
retitle 724920 opencv: non-free, non distributable files
Bug #724920 [src:opencv] opencv: non-free files
Changed Bug title to 'opencv: non-free, non distributable files' from
'opencv: non-free files'
retitle 724923 cminpack: non-free, non distributable files
Bug #724923 {Done: Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org} [src:cminpack]
cminpack: non-free files
Changed Bug title to 'cminpack: non-free, non distributable files' from
'cminpack: non-free files'
retitle 71 pynetsnmp: hardcodes knowledge about external ABIs
Bug #71 [src:pynetsnmp] pynetsnmp: makes baby jesus cry
Changed Bug title to 'pynetsnmp: hardcodes knowledge about external ABIs'
from 'pynetsnmp: makes baby jesus cry'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
71: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=71
721925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=721925
722265: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722265
722979: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=722979
723103: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723103
724920: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724920
724923: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724923
724941: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724941
724943: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724943
728414: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728414
733285: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733285
734276: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734276
734800: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734800
734855: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734855
Re: libxml-security-java REMOVED from testing
On 02/01/2014 08:39 AM, Debian testing watch wrote: FYI: The status of the libxml-security-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.5.5-2 Current version: (not in testing) Hint: http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals Bug #733938: libxml-security-java: CVE-2013-4517 The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals. 1.5.6, which addresses the RC CVE, has been uploaded to unstable. Still to do is to address the CVE in stable. tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: libspring-java: Package 3.2.6 or more recent releases
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: owner 732215 ! Bug #732215 [src:libspring-java] libspring-java: Package 3.2.6 or more recent releases Owner changed from Adrian Alves aal...@gmail.com to Miguel Landaeta nomad...@debian.org. owner 737436 aal...@gmail.com Bug #737436 [libhibernate-validator-java] libhibernate-validator-java: Please package a more recent version Owner recorded as aal...@gmail.com. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 732215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732215 737436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737436 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed
Processing control commands: severity -1 serious Bug #690152 [src:bsaf] bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 690152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed
Processing control commands: tag -1 - wheezy Bug #690152 [src:bsaf] bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed Removed tag(s) wheezy. -- 690152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#690152: bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed
Processing control commands: tags -1 -unreproducible Bug #690152 [src:bsaf] bsaf: FTBFS: Test org.jdesktop.application.TaskMonitorTest failed Removed tag(s) unreproducible. -- 690152: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690152 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding relaxngcc_1.12-1_amd64.changes
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Timo Aaltonen tjaal...@ubuntu.com wrote: On 22.01.2014 15:56, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 22.01.2014 15:21, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 21.01.2014 14:44, Gergely Nagy wrote: - There are a couple of files in the source that have comments like: /* this file is generated by RelaxNGCC */ Are these files rebuildable? (Sadly, my Java build system knowledge is not enough to determine this on my own) Not sure, no idea where they were generated from.. I'll see if they are needed at all. I could remove all of them without any issues, so best to recreate the tarball and push to NEW again, with all the fixes. scratch that, removing those trims the resulting .jar too and breaks at least JAXB build.. Well, we need all files to be rebuildable, all generated files need their source, and we need at least documentation on how to rebuild them, even if they aren't rebuilt on every build. I'm afraid I'll have to reject the package in the current state, until this issue is solved. (The other things would be fine in a -2 version, but not this one). __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: qiime REMOVED from testing
Hi, thanks to the hint od Steven below I wonder if I could get more help to solve #731190 which boils down to the question why libjogl-java is not available on kfreebsd. I addressed this to the maintainer (debian-java) but his new upload did not fixed the issue obviously. It even seemed to make things worse, since the package now fails to build on even more architectures as http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=libjogl-java shows and kfreebsd is not even on the list of architectures any more. Hope anybody will have a clue - otherwise I will restrict the qiime to the architectures that do not have trouble with libjogl-java. Kind regards Andreas. On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 08:21:15PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 21/01/14 20:10, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2014-01-21 19:45, Andreas Tille wrote: I know that qiime has a serious bug (#731190) where I was seeking for help six weeks ago with no real result. So I would have expected to become kicked from testing because of this bug which would be fine. Please, please Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org for help with something like this. I only noticed that bug today because I happen to read -release@ ... -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: qiime REMOVED from testing
On 21/01/14 20:32, Andreas Tille wrote: [...] #731190 which boils down to the question why libjogl-java is not available on kfreebsd. AFAICT that package has never been available on kfreebsd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libjogl-javaarch=kfreebsd-amd64 I'm currently not sure of the best action to take: If that package is only needed for qiime to work on Linux, the dependency could be limited to [linux-any]. Or if that package crucial for qiime to work at all, you can only request its removal from kfreebsd. (From unstable - by filing a bug with ftpmaster). Or with luck, someone might be able to get libjogl-java built on kfreebsd. (I think changes to gluegen2 are needed). There's a more immediate problem that qiime now FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=libjogl-java shows and kfreebsd is not even on the list of architectures any more. That's the wrong page - that's the debian-ports.org infrastructure. Architectures for Debian sid are here: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libjogl-java I'm curious why it talks about 'downloading', it's not really downloading source code during the build, I hope? FastTree.c downloaded successfully. FastTree built. Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 183, in module if download_UCLUST(): File setup.py, line 140, in download_UCLUST raise SystemError, (Platform not supported by UCLUST) SystemError: Platform not supported by UCLUST Seems like some porting is needed, maybe not much. I'm looking into it right now... Thanks! Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: qiime REMOVED from testing
On 21/01/14 21:05, Andreas Tille wrote: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libjogl-java FastTree.c downloaded successfully. FastTree built. Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 183, in module if download_UCLUST(): File setup.py, line 140, in download_UCLUST raise SystemError, (Platform not supported by UCLUST) SystemError: Platform not supported by UCLUST From where did you got this line. I'm aware of it from the test suite which is known to fail for this reason. UCLUST is non-free and was removed from the soures - so this must fail obviously (patching the test suite is work in progress). It's quoted from the link above, Tail of log for qiime on kfreebsd-amd64. It's an excerpt from near the end of the build log on kfreebsd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=qiimearch=kfreebsd-amd64ver=1.8.0%2Bdfsg-2stamp=1388360126 UCLUST is non-free and was removed from the soures setup.py is trying to 'download' it, at least. Whatever that means. On i386 that step is successful. I hope to get a closer look at this soon (waiting for qiime source to unpack on a verrry overloaded machine). Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: qiime REMOVED from testing
Hi Steven, thanks for your quick response. On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 08:44:27PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 21/01/14 20:32, Andreas Tille wrote: [...] #731190 which boils down to the question why libjogl-java is not available on kfreebsd. AFAICT that package has never been available on kfreebsd: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libjogl-javaarch=kfreebsd-amd64 I'm currently not sure of the best action to take: If that package is only needed for qiime to work on Linux, the dependency could be limited to [linux-any]. I admit I have no idea about the usage of libjogl-java in qiime, but since it is no direct dependency but it is introduced by a dependency of king and libjogl-java is deprecated (see #706922) we most probably will not be very lucky. Or if that package crucial for qiime to work at all, you can only request its removal from kfreebsd. (From unstable - by filing a bug with ftpmaster). Or with luck, someone might be able to get libjogl-java built on kfreebsd. (I think changes to gluegen2 are needed). I have no idea what gluegen2 might be. There's a more immediate problem that qiime now FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=libjogl-java shows and kfreebsd is not even on the list of architectures any more. That's the wrong page - that's the debian-ports.org infrastructure. Architectures for Debian sid are here: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libjogl-java I'm curious why it talks about 'downloading', it's not really downloading source code during the build, I hope? No, it is not. At least under amd64 is builds fine in pbuilder. FastTree.c downloaded successfully. FastTree built. Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 183, in module if download_UCLUST(): File setup.py, line 140, in download_UCLUST raise SystemError, (Platform not supported by UCLUST) SystemError: Platform not supported by UCLUST Seems like some porting is needed, maybe not much. I'm looking into it right now... From where did you got this line. I'm aware of it from the test suite which is known to fail for this reason. UCLUST is non-free and was removed from the soures - so this must fail obviously (patching the test suite is work in progress). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: qiime REMOVED from testing
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libjogl-java FastTree.c downloaded successfully. FastTree built. Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 183, in module if download_UCLUST(): File setup.py, line 140, in download_UCLUST raise SystemError, (Platform not supported by UCLUST) SystemError: Platform not supported by UCLUST Oddly, I didn't get that error building qiime 1.7.0+dfsg-1 just now, it built successfully. But the resulting package is going to be uninstallable on kfreebsd unless we manage to port packages (gluegen2 first I think, and then) libjogl-jni, libjogl-java, king. If king is absolutely needed for qiime to be useful, I think the only available option currently is to make it Architecture: linux-any and request that ftpmaster remove the old packages built for kfreebsd-* from sid. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: qiime REMOVED from testing
Hi Steven, On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:35:33PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libjogl-java FastTree.c downloaded successfully. FastTree built. Traceback (most recent call last): File setup.py, line 183, in module if download_UCLUST(): File setup.py, line 140, in download_UCLUST raise SystemError, (Platform not supported by UCLUST) SystemError: Platform not supported by UCLUST Oddly, I didn't get that error building qiime 1.7.0+dfsg-1 just now, it built successfully. Good. As I said: There should be nothing downloaded specifically not UCLUST which is non-free. But the resulting package is going to be uninstallable on kfreebsd unless we manage to port packages (gluegen2 first I think, and then) libjogl-jni, libjogl-java, king. If king is absolutely needed for qiime to be useful, I think the only available option currently is to make it Architecture: linux-any and request that ftpmaster remove the old packages built for kfreebsd-* from sid. Well, for king we have another problem that it depends from the deprecated libjogl-java and should be replaced by libjogl2-java. Unfortunately upstream did not answered my request[1]. I just tried the brute force method to simply replace the JAR filename jogl.jar by jogl2.jar and see what might happen[2]. It results in 100 errors (most probably a lot of consequences of some initial errors - I have injected the relevant build log snippet into the patch file[2] as well in case this might enlight somebody else than me (since I have no idea about jogl nor about Java in general). May be if we could somehow deal with this it could be some option for the further steps. Alternatively I inspected the qiime code and it actually provides an alternative to the default use of king which is called InVUE. This is not yet packaged but looks interesting even if there are no proper upstream releases but just a SVN repository. May be packaging InVUE could bring ous out of the trouble with the deprecated libjogl-java. Kind regards Andreas. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706922#10 [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/king/trunk/debian/patches/use_jogl2.patch?view=markup [3] http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/invue -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: qiime REMOVED from testing
Hi Steven, On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:45:50AM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 22/01/14 10:49, Andreas Tille wrote: Well, for king we have another problem that it depends from the deprecated libjogl-java and should be replaced by libjogl2-java. I tried removing libjogl-java, and KiNG still seems to work? I admit that I was quite astonished that the package builds despite the errors. I don't know if the graphics are being 'accelerated' or not, but: http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu/kinemage/king-manual.html#tth_sEc3.3.2 This feature has been tested with various combinations of Java 1.4.2 through Java 1.6.0 and JOGL 1.1 through JOGL 1.1.1. JOGL is still under development, as is this feature, and interacting so directly with the hardware is always risky, so it's possible that OpenGL rendering may hang KiNG on your computer. You've been warned. Hopefully, a future version of Java (possibly the 1.6.x series) will use OpenGL behind the scenes for all graphics operations, making KiNG much faster and making this feature obsolete. Until then, this is a work-around for large kinemages where performance is an issue. So it may be that graphics rendering is fast enough in openjdk-6 and -7 that KiNG's use of JOGL is obsolete anyway? This would be cool and I'd be very happy if somebody of the Java team would comment on this. If the libjogl-java dependency is dropped, king should be installable on kfreebsd and then so would qiime. And libjogl2-java transition can go ahead. Most probably this would be the most simple solution. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: freehep-graphicsio-svg: Recompilation of the package breaks other packages
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 10:49:06AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: In didn't some digging in the reverse deps and found the following bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688043 In fact, adding that patch to the version of maven-debian-helper in Wheezy and rebuilding the source packages mentioned above fixes the geogebra build. I'm adding the Debian Java maintainers to CC, what's the proper fix forward here, should the patch from #688043 be shipped in a point release or are the freehep packages buggy and require other fixes? This bug also applies to geronimo-jta-1.1-spec. Rebuilding it in stable leads to a broken package which e.g. results in additional build failures of libhibernate-jbosscache-java. Also reported independently as http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708405 Rebuilding geronimo-jta-1.1-spec with the maven-debian-helper patch above fixes that as well. Cheers, Moritz __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#736793: [src:jenkin] Sourceless minified javascript
Processing control commands: reassign -1 src:jenkins Bug #736792 [src:jenkin] [src:jenkin] Sourceless flash file Warning: Unknown package 'src:jenkin' Bug reassigned from package 'src:jenkin' to 'src:jenkins'. No longer marked as found in versions jenkin/1.509.2+dfsg-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #736792 to the same values previously set -- 736792: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736792 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#736793: [src:jenkin] Sourceless minified javascript
Processing control commands: reassign -1 src:jenkins Bug #736793 [src:jenkin] [src:jenkin] Sourceless minified javascript Warning: Unknown package 'src:jenkin' Bug reassigned from package 'src:jenkin' to 'src:jenkins'. No longer marked as found in versions jenkin/1.509.2+dfsg-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #736793 to the same values previously set -- 736793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736793 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: freehep-graphicsio-svg: Recompilation of the package breaks other packages
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 04:13:19PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: freehep-graphicsio-svg
Version: 2.1.1-3
Severity: serious
I ran into the following bug with stable, but the version is the same as in
unstable:
If I compile geogebra with the binary deb package as shipped in stable it
compiles fine.
However, if I rebuild freehep-graphicsio-svg in stable, the geogebra builds
breaks with
the following error:
-
src/geogebra/export/SVGExtensions.java:16: package org.freehep.graphicsio.svg
does not exist
public class SVGExtensions extends org.freehep.graphicsio.svg.SVGGraphics2D {
^
src/geogebra/export/GraphicExportDialog.java:59: package
org.freehep.graphicsio.svg does not exist
import org.freehep.graphicsio.svg.SVGGraphics2D;
^
src/geogebra/export/SVGExtensions.java:23: cannot find symbol
symbol : variable os
location: class geogebra.export.SVGExtensions
os.println(g id=\ + s + \);
^
src/geogebra/export/SVGExtensions.java:27: cannot find symbol
symbol : variable os
location: class geogebra.export.SVGExtensions
os.println(/g!-- + s + --);
^
src/geogebra/export/GraphicExportDialog.java:708: cannot find symbol
symbol : variable SVGGraphics2D
location: class geogebra.export.GraphicExportDialog
final UserProperties props = (UserProperties)
SVGGraphics2D
^
src/geogebra/export/GraphicExportDialog.java:710: cannot find symbol
symbol : variable SVGGraphics2D
location: class geogebra.export.GraphicExportDialog
props.setProperty(SVGGraphics2D.EMBED_FONTS,
!textAsShapes);
^
src/geogebra/export/GraphicExportDialog.java:711: cannot find symbol
symbol : variable SVGGraphics2D
location: class geogebra.export.GraphicExportDialog
props.setProperty(SVGGraphics2D.TEXT_AS_SHAPES,
textAsShapes);
^
src/geogebra/export/GraphicExportDialog.java:712: cannot find symbol
symbol : variable SVGGraphics2D
location: class geogebra.export.GraphicExportDialog
SVGGraphics2D.setDefaultProperties(props);
^
src/geogebra/export/GraphicExportDialog.java:724: cannot find symbol
symbol : method startExport()
location: class geogebra.export.SVGExtensions
g.startExport();
^
src/geogebra/export/GraphicExportDialog.java:725: cannot find symbol
symbol : method exportPaintPre(geogebra.export.SVGExtensions,double)
location: class geogebra.euclidian.EuclidianView
ev.exportPaintPre(g, exportScale);
^
src/geogebra/export/GraphicExportDialog.java:728:
drawObjectsPre(java.awt.Graphics2D) in geogebra.euclidian.EuclidianView
cannot be applied to (geogebra.export.SVGExtensions)
ev.drawObjectsPre(g);
^
src/geogebra/export/GraphicExportDialog.java:738:
drawAll(java.awt.Graphics2D) in geogebra.euclidian.DrawableList cannot be
applied to (geogebra.export.SVGExtensions)
ev.drawLayers[layer].drawAll(g);
^
src/geogebra/export/GraphicExportDialog.java:742: cannot find symbol
symbol : method endExport()
location: class geogebra.export.SVGExtensions
g.endExport();
^
src/geogebra/gui/util/BrowserLauncher.java:36: warning: non-varargs call of
varargs method with inexact argument type for last parameter;
cast to java.lang.Class for a varargs call
cast to java.lang.Class[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning
Method getDesktop =
desktopClass.getDeclaredMethod(getDesktop, null);
^
src/geogebra/gui/util/BrowserLauncher.java:38: warning: non-varargs call of
varargs method with inexact argument type for last parameter;
cast to java.lang.Object for a varargs call
cast to java.lang.Object[] for a non-varargs call and to suppress this warning
Object desktopObj = getDesktop.invoke(null, null);
^
Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
Note: Some input fi
-
The rebuilt package misses a symlink. The binary package currently shipped
with stable contains this:
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libfreehep-graphicsio-svg-java
/usr/share/doc/libfreehep-graphicsio-svg-java/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/libfreehep-graphicsio-svg-java/copyright
/usr/share/maven-repo
Re: Comments regarding relaxngcc_1.12-1_amd64.changes
On 21.01.2014 14:44, Gergely Nagy wrote: Dear maintainer, While processing your upload of relaxngcc 1.12-1, I noticed the following things about the packaging: - The source tarball has been repacked, but this is not documented anywhere, and the only sign of it is the get-orig-targz target in debian/rules. Please document this in the debian/copyright file. Explaining why the repacking was done and what is removed would also be nice to see documented in debian/README.source, not just as comments in debian/rules. Pretty much all the java packages I've dealt with repack the source, filtering .class and .jar files and whatnot. Now I see though that it doesn't have README.source at all, I'll add that to git. - src/relaxngcc/javabody/JavaBodyParser.jj does not appear to be under the Apache-1.1 license, but what exactly it is under, is unclear to me. This should be clarified. Looks like it's from javacc: examples/JavaGrammars/Java1.1.jj and modified for this project. The original file is under BSD-3-clause. - There are a couple of files in the source that have comments like: /* this file is generated by RelaxNGCC */ Are these files rebuildable? (Sadly, my Java build system knowledge is not enough to determine this on my own) Not sure, no idea where they were generated from.. I'll see if they are needed at all. None of these warrant a reject, but I would like to see them clarified, if I'm to let the package through NEW. If you want to correct them, and reupload, instead of fixing them in a future version, that is also an option. I will reject the current version from NEW then, and you can reupload after. If it's ok I'll push updates to git and get -2 uploaded soon enough that should cover all the above. Getting -1 through NEW would still be nice :) -- t __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding relaxngcc_1.12-1_amd64.changes
On 22.01.2014 15:21, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 21.01.2014 14:44, Gergely Nagy wrote: - There are a couple of files in the source that have comments like: /* this file is generated by RelaxNGCC */ Are these files rebuildable? (Sadly, my Java build system knowledge is not enough to determine this on my own) Not sure, no idea where they were generated from.. I'll see if they are needed at all. I could remove all of them without any issues, so best to recreate the tarball and push to NEW again, with all the fixes. -- t __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding relaxngcc_1.12-1_amd64.changes
On 22.01.2014 15:56, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 22.01.2014 15:21, Timo Aaltonen wrote: On 21.01.2014 14:44, Gergely Nagy wrote: - There are a couple of files in the source that have comments like: /* this file is generated by RelaxNGCC */ Are these files rebuildable? (Sadly, my Java build system knowledge is not enough to determine this on my own) Not sure, no idea where they were generated from.. I'll see if they are needed at all. I could remove all of them without any issues, so best to recreate the tarball and push to NEW again, with all the fixes. scratch that, removing those trims the resulting .jar too and breaks at least JAXB build.. so I guess they just need an exception on debian/copyright? -- t __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed (with 6 errors): Re: Bug#736101: Non free files
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 657281 736101
Bug #657281 [fop] src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf/ sRGB Color Space Profile.icm is
non-free
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #736101 is 'src:fop' not 'fop'
Failed to forcibly merge 657281: Did not alter merged bugs
Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x34127b8)',
'requester', 'Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org', 'request_addr',
'cont...@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid',
'ca+7wuswxux27om8ubt_zy70wuq4ykimbb8uetbaanbarce-...@mail.gma...',
'request_subject', ...) called at
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 552
eval {...} called at
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 551
Debbugs::Control::Service::control_line('line', undef, 'clonebugs',
'HASH(0x33804c8)', 'limit', 'HASH(0x33767e8)', 'common_control_options',
'ARRAY(0x3376830)', 'errors', ...) called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 474
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 8:52 PM, bastien ROUCARIES
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Package: src:fop
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Version: 1:1.1.dfsg-2
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Severity: serious
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Too many unknown commands, stopping here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
657281: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657281
736101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736101
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#648624: lwjgl: upstream = 2.8 needs libasm4-java
Processing control commands: retitle -1 Please upgrade lwjgl to a more recent version Bug #648624 [src:lwjgl] lwjgl: upstream = 2.8 needs libasm4-java Changed Bug title to 'Please upgrade lwjgl to a more recent version' from 'lwjgl: upstream = 2.8 needs libasm4-java' -- 648624: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648624 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Documentation and other changes for solr
Following up from my own post: On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 13:31 +, Andrew Beverley wrote: 1. Having spent some time grappling with the installation and set up of solr, I'd like to add a few things to the Debian documentation. Presumably adding to /usr/share/doc/solr-common/README.Debian is the best thing to do, or have I missed some other existing documentation? In the meantime, I've created a Debian wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/Solr 2. I created a multi-instance solr set up. I've put details in the wiki of how I did this. 3. I see that dataimporthandler-extras, clustering, extraction and velocity are not available due to missing dependencies. Are there any plans to include these at a later date? If not, where is the recommended path to install them locally? I have used /usr/local/lib, but not sure if this is the best place. In the end I used /usr/local/share/java/. Again, details in the wiki. Andy __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding jenkins-constant-pool-scanner_1.2-1_i386.changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Luca On 09/01/14 14:31, Luca Falavigna wrote: please ask upstream to add a COPYING file to better document the license of this project. It's not so immediate to find it. I've raised an issue upstream to request this be added. Is the current reference in pom.xml sufficient for acceptance into the archive, or do you need this update prior to approval? Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSzrQkAAoJEL/srsug59jDm4wQAMysTkZjQACvfPdSmwkzrC4J YPletmH5qWh+MDZsKSvh8HQDCoZGf3bBsKVJrogR6GPnl01UW21fb9LAxWs9uQar Yzh4UOnxRmEW5SixpuPg6LqNW5IBYiou4xQ6ZDjzoj48Keqf66KGgyxvQXxoso7u H3juMEXRoZPNZm9hT+81xNQvjnEmohbDLfkbeSD/serEwzeggT8iSTFUfAb+sUg3 ypMSsPfmuj26HsN9PGBU36CumnX1BIodwo9wrf5zPk+T+n+YOlcJE13yecvd8J+7 jhTkfG+DQRp7sqb9QP2JeagOYZKJN4KDgOFN49gL+tzOKTuepzbm7Sf10j05XkcU wZhxMEZJP/DEH7xYdfgTC0mfhwZQpEduGkG9Em9qK3TVpHSebxmVfdnuUVToQOQO skEzZER2zD8MehM46XW9+08lRzXRXPy/vsyh0SEaGaG2yFLpgLsB2L7ewE19eCcZ M/gPDGzbhsBSkLaB9rNdB4T+3u4nwOJE/GUlWgO5NC4vT66UbHgs6MEOSRqI/Pe0 0WEzBcL1DLXckzOJbtLcU+9lfkpW/xRcoQWq+GTMZ6+IMG3/efT+cPHA8plOnTV5 FOJ7a2DOKO7kAmIYKjwyR5yJ23iv6q2ZItPcnjENZ914dAsuUCNCoBwcmLFJzW+G 11fQOJ7ZMCIxpv/WMJzn =nzYq -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#734243: closure-compiler: Install a useful manpage for ‘closure-compiler’ command
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: package src:closure-compiler Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'src:closure-compiler' Limit currently set to 'package':'src:closure-compiler' tags 734243 + patch Bug #734243 [src:closure-compiler] closure-compiler: Install a useful manpage for ‘closure-compiler’ command Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 734243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734243 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Trying again to restart the processing package
Hi David! Good luck with the packaging. Last week I was using processing for something and remembered this ITP. I should have dropped it, thanks for taking it. I had a working build for processing for a very old version (which was doing the build as a series of scripts). The newer versions use a much saner system, so my work is no longer relevant. If you have something, I can help you test it and if you want to bounce ideas, I'll be at #debian-java again (I'm DrDub). Great news! P. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: libnb-platform18-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On 2014-01-05 07:50, Debian FTP Masters wrote: There was an uncaught exception when processing your upload: Traceback (most recent call last): File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_upload.py, line 213, in wrapper return function(directory, upload, *args, **kwargs) File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_upload.py, line 305, in accept_to_new upload.install_to_new() File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py, line 1269, in install_to_new (db_source, db_binaries) = self._install_to_suite(new_suite, source_component_func, binary_component_func, source_suites=True, extra_source_archives=[suite.archive]) File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py, line 976, in _install_to_suite db_binary = self.transaction.install_binary(self.directory, binary, suite, component, fingerprint=self.fingerprint, source_suites=source_suites, extra_source_archives=extra_source_archives) File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py, line 194, in install_binary self._add_built_using(db_binary, binary.hashed_file.filename, control, suite, extra_archives=extra_source_archives) File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py, line 249, in _add_built_using assert comp == '=', 'Built-Using must contain strict dependencies' AssertionError: Built-Using must contain strict dependencies Any original reject reason follows below. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. [...] Dear FTP masters, You may want to catch that error and present it less like dak crashed and more like the uploader messed up. ~Niels __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#734285: libjogl2-java: FTBFS on s390x (and ia64)
Processing control commands: reassign -1 libgluegen2-build-java Bug #734285 [libjogl2-java] libjogl2-java: FTBFS on s390x (and ia64) Bug reassigned from package 'libjogl2-java' to 'libgluegen2-build-java'. No longer marked as found in versions libjogl2-java/2.1.3-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #734285 to the same values previously set forcemerge 733310 -1 Bug #733310 [libgluegen2-build-java] libgluegen2-build-java: missing architectures support in glibc-compat-symbols.h Bug #734285 [libgluegen2-build-java] libjogl2-java: FTBFS on s390x (and ia64) Marked as found in versions gluegen2/2.1.3-1. Added tag(s) upstream and patch. Merged 733310 734285 affects 733310 libjogl2-java Bug #733310 [libgluegen2-build-java] libgluegen2-build-java: missing architectures support in glibc-compat-symbols.h Bug #734285 [libgluegen2-build-java] libjogl2-java: FTBFS on s390x (and ia64) Added indication that 733310 affects libjogl2-java Added indication that 734285 affects libjogl2-java -- 733310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=733310 734285: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734285 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: libnb-platform18-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On 01/05/2014 01:02 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2014-01-05 07:50, Debian FTP Masters wrote: There was an uncaught exception when processing your upload: Traceback (most recent call last): File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_upload.py, line 213, in wrapper return function(directory, upload, *args, **kwargs) File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_upload.py, line 305, in accept_to_new upload.install_to_new() File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py, line 1269, in install_to_new (db_source, db_binaries) = self._install_to_suite(new_suite, source_component_func, binary_component_func, source_suites=True, extra_source_archives=[suite.archive]) File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py, line 976, in _install_to_suite db_binary = self.transaction.install_binary(self.directory, binary, suite, component, fingerprint=self.fingerprint, source_suites=source_suites, extra_source_archives=extra_source_archives) File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py, line 194, in install_binary self._add_built_using(db_binary, binary.hashed_file.filename, control, suite, extra_archives=extra_source_archives) File /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py, line 249, in _add_built_using assert comp == '=', 'Built-Using must contain strict dependencies' AssertionError: Built-Using must contain strict dependencies Any original reject reason follows below. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. [...] Dear FTP masters, You may want to catch that error and present it less like dak crashed and more like the uploader messed up. ~Niels Hi Niels, Good idea. A pointer to section 7.8 [0] would be helpful. Thanks, tony [0] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-built-using signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#733996: Generate a ‘closure-compiler’ binary package for the compiler program
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 11:50:36 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: On 31-Dec-2013, gregor herrmann wrote: Can't this be solved with a simple Provides: closure-compiler in the libclosure-compiler-java package? (Or the other way round.) That doesn't address: * a manpage for the command (required by Debian policy), which is extraneous for a libary package That's not my interpretation of Debian Policy, or maybe I misunderstood you. 12.1. Each program, utility, and function should have an associated manual page included in the same package. It is suggested that all configuration files also have a manual page included as well. Manual pages for protocols and other auxiliary things are optional. I can't find any reference to library packages or similar. So if closure-compiler can be executed it needs a manpage, no matter in which (kind) package under which name it is. Having a de facto empty package doesn't seem very appealing to me. No package providing a command should be empty; there needs to be the command, and a manpage, at least. So this objection doesn't seem to apply for bug#733996. My understanding of the idea [0] was that the new closure-compiler package would only contain a symlink (and a dependency), since that actual command is the same jar as what is in libclosure-compiler-java [1]. If that's the case, it still feels a bit odd to me. If I misunderstood the situation or there are other ideas on how to separate a binary and a library package, that's fine for me :) Cheers, gregor [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705565#100 [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705565#90 -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Dire Straits: Lions signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#734011: Can’t build a package using closure-compiler
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: package wnpp Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp' Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp' block 726171 by 734011 Bug #726171 [wnpp] ITP: libjs-zxcvbn -- realistic password strength estimation 726171 was blocked by: 726294 705565 726171 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 726171: 734011 severity 734011 important package: libclosure-compiler-java' does not match at least one of wnpp Failed to set severity of Bug 734011 to important: limit failed for bugs: 734011. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 726171: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726171 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#734011: Can’t build a package using closure-compiler
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: package libclosure-compiler-java Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'libclosure-compiler-java' Limit currently set to 'package':'libclosure-compiler-java' severity 734011 important Bug #734011 [libclosure-compiler-java] Can’t build a package using closure-compiler Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 734011: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734011 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#730685: wheezy-only backporting bug; does not affect jessie or sid
Processing control commands: severity -1 important Bug #730685 [trilead-putty-extension] missing build-dependency: org.jenkins-ci:trilead-ssh2:jar:debian Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 730685: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730685 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#705565: Getting closure compiler back in testing?
On Monday, December 30, 2013 10:19:53 AM Daniel Pocock wrote: Tony made some commits in Git and it appears he is working to resolve this The rename of the binary package from libclosure-compiler-java - closure-compiler should probably be done now as well to get this out of the way well before the Jessie release. I've made the changes for a rename on a branch called pkgrename and pushed that into Git Tony, are you making another upload shortly, would you like to merge pkgrename perhaps? closure compiler is also a library dependency, e.g. of gwt. It might be a good idea to provide two binary packages, one for the library jar and another one for the manpage + executable. Regards, Thomas Koch __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#732959: eclipse 3.8 is ancient. 4.3.1 is the most recent version available @ eclipse.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 732959 wishlist Bug #732959 [eclipse] eclipse 3.8 is ancient. 4.3.1 is the most recent version available @ eclipse.org Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important' merge 732959 725377 Bug #732959 [eclipse] eclipse 3.8 is ancient. 4.3.1 is the most recent version available @ eclipse.org Bug #732959 [eclipse] eclipse 3.8 is ancient. 4.3.1 is the most recent version available @ eclipse.org Marked as found in versions eclipse/3.8.0~rc4-1. Bug #681726 [eclipse] eclipse: Upgrade Eclipse to Juno 4.2 Bug #725377 [eclipse] eclipse: Upgrade Eclipse 3.8.1 to Eclipse Kepler 4.3.1 (or newer) Merged 681726 725377 732959 merge 681726 725377 Bug #681726 [eclipse] eclipse: Upgrade Eclipse to Juno 4.2 Bug #725377 [eclipse] eclipse: Upgrade Eclipse 3.8.1 to Eclipse Kepler 4.3.1 (or newer) Bug #732959 [eclipse] eclipse 3.8 is ancient. 4.3.1 is the most recent version available @ eclipse.org Bug #725377 [eclipse] eclipse: Upgrade Eclipse 3.8.1 to Eclipse Kepler 4.3.1 (or newer) Bug #732959 [eclipse] eclipse 3.8 is ancient. 4.3.1 is the most recent version available @ eclipse.org Merged 681726 725377 732959 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 681726: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681726 725377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725377 732959: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732959 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: re: missing build-dependency: org.jenkins-ci:trilead-ssh2:jar:debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 730685 +wheezy Bug #730685 [trilead-putty-extension] missing build-dependency: org.jenkins-ci:trilead-ssh2:jar:debian Added tag(s) wheezy. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 730685: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730685 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#729840: New patch with updated way of showing distribution
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 729840 +pending Bug #729840 [tomcat7] tomcat7: Show distribution on Tomcat version Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 729840: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729840 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Problems when building binary package of libcommons-fileupload-java under wheezy
Hi Emmanuel, hi Debian Java Maintainers, On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 09:30:49PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Le 21/12/2013 19:24, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : Thanks, this indeed seems to make it better. I have uploade the resulting preliminary packages to [1]. If you have time in the coming days to give them a bit of testing I would really appreciate. [1] http://people.debian.org/~carnil/libcommons-fileupload-java/ Let me know if this if fine with you (also if you prefer to prepare the packges yourself). I won't have the time to test it thoroughly, but at first glance the package content looks good, so go ahead and upload it. Thanks. I'm waiting some more days before releasing the packages. In case somebody can test the resulting packages on production system. Please Cc me if you send feedback/restult as I'm not subscribed on pkg-java-maintainers's list. I'm confident about the patch (it is in unstable, and furthermore in Ubuntu), but there was a problem when rebuilding the package under wheezy. Above hint from Emmanuel helped. The packages are available at above place. Regards, Salvatore signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Problems when building binary package of libcommons-fileupload-java under wheezy
Le 21/12/2013 16:02, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : Any idea what is happening? Hi Salvatore, I can't check in detail now, but the --java-lib flag is probably missing from the debian/libcommons-fileupload-java.poms file. Emmanuel Bourg __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Problems when building binary package of libcommons-fileupload-java under wheezy
Hi Emmanuel,
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 05:58:33PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 21/12/2013 16:02, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit :
Any idea what is happening?
Hi Salvatore,
I can't check in detail now, but the --java-lib flag is probably missing
from the debian/libcommons-fileupload-java.poms file.
Thanks, this indeed seems to make it better. I have uploade the
resulting preliminary packages to [1]. If you have time in the coming
days to give them a bit of testing I would really appreciate.
[1] http://people.debian.org/~carnil/libcommons-fileupload-java/
Let me know if this if fine with you (also if you prefer to prepare
the packges yourself).
Regards,
Salvatore
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]
Files in second .deb but not in first
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/share/maven-repo/commons-fileupload/commons-fileupload/1.2.2/commons-fileupload-1.2.2-javadoc.jar
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Depends: [-default-jdk-doc, libportlet-api-2.0-spec-java-doc,
libservlet2.5-java-doc-] {+default-jdk-doc+}
Installed-Size: [-1780-] {+1828+}
[-Recommends: libcommons-io-java-doc-]
Version: [-1.2.2-1-] {+1.2.2-1+deb7u1+}
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]
Files in second .deb but not in first
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/java/commons-fileupload.jar
lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/share/java/commons-fileupload-1.2.2.jar -
commons-fileupload.jar
lrwxrwxrwx root/root
/usr/share/maven-repo/commons-fileupload/commons-fileupload/1.2.2/commons-fileupload-1.2.2.jar
- ../../../../java/commons-fileupload.jar
lrwxrwxrwx root/root
/usr/share/maven-repo/commons-fileupload/commons-fileupload/debian/commons-fileupload-debian.jar
- ../../../../java/commons-fileupload.jar
Files in first .deb but not in second
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/share/maven-repo/commons-fileupload/commons-fileupload/1.2.2/commons-fileupload-1.2.2.jar
lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/share/java/commons-fileupload-1.2.2.jar -
../maven-repo/commons-fileupload/commons-fileupload/1.2.2/commons-fileupload-1.2.2.jar
lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/share/java/commons-fileupload.jar -
../maven-repo/commons-fileupload/commons-fileupload/1.2.2/commons-fileupload-1.2.2.jar
lrwxrwxrwx root/root
/usr/share/maven-repo/commons-fileupload/commons-fileupload/debian/commons-fileupload-debian.jar
- ../1.2.2/commons-fileupload-1.2.2.jar
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Installed-Size: [-136-] {+118+}
Version: [-1.2.2-1-] {+1.2.2-1+deb7u1+}
diff -Nru libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/changelog
libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/changelog
--- libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/changelog 2010-08-04
13:57:08.0 +0200
+++ libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/changelog 2013-12-21
19:09:21.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+libcommons-fileupload-java (1.2.2-1+deb7u1) wheezy-security; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team.
+ * Add CVE-2013-2186.patch patch.
+CVE-2013-2186: Arbitrary file upload via deserialization. Properly
+validate repository in org.apache.commons.fileupload.disk.DiskFileItem.
+Thanks to Marc Deslauriers marc.deslauri...@ubuntu.com (Closes: #726601)
+ * Add --java-lib to libcommons-fileupload-java.poms.
+Otherwise in the resulting binary package commons-fileupload.jar in
+/usr/share/java is missing.
+Thanks to Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org
+
+ -- Salvatore Bonaccorso car...@debian.org Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:08:48 +0100
+
libcommons-fileupload-java (1.2.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru
libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/libcommons-fileupload-java.poms
libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/libcommons-fileupload-java.poms
--- libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/libcommons-fileupload-java.poms
2010-03-31 01:02:11.0 +0200
+++ libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/libcommons-fileupload-java.poms
2013-12-21 19:09:21.0 +0100
@@ -1 +1 @@
-pom.xml --no-parent
+pom.xml --no-parent --java-lib
diff -Nru libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/patches/CVE-2013-2186.patch
libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/patches/CVE-2013-2186.patch
--- libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/patches/CVE-2013-2186.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libcommons-fileupload-java-1.2.2/debian/patches/CVE-2013-2186.patch
2013-12-21 11:01:51.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+Description: fix arbitrary file overwrite via poison null byte
+Origin: backport,
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/fileupload/disk/DiskFileItem.java?r1=1460343r2=1507048
Re: Problems when building binary package of libcommons-fileupload-java under wheezy
Le 21/12/2013 19:24, Salvatore Bonaccorso a écrit : Thanks, this indeed seems to make it better. I have uploade the resulting preliminary packages to [1]. If you have time in the coming days to give them a bit of testing I would really appreciate. [1] http://people.debian.org/~carnil/libcommons-fileupload-java/ Let me know if this if fine with you (also if you prefer to prepare the packges yourself). I won't have the time to test it thoroughly, but at first glance the package content looks good, so go ahead and upload it. Emmanuel Bourg __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#731190: Why is libjogl-java not available on kfreebsd (Was: Bug#731190: qiime: uninstallable on kfreebsd)
Hi, On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:11:52PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: On 12/02/2013 11:33 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: qiime 1.5.0-1 added a dependency on king. The dependency chain king → libjogl-java → libjogl-jni is not satisfiable on kfreebsd (libjogl-jni doesn't exist there). Cheers, Julien Hi Andreas, The buildd report for the package looks quite strange: http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=libjogl-java I will do a sourceful upload soon to freshen the packaging and we can see if it takes a more normal path through the buildds. I can not (not any more?) see something that shows any specific thing about BSD. What should I do? [ ] Excluding BSD to solve this issue [ ] Wait Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: saxonhe_9.4.0.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: Hi, as discovered in our previous mail exchange, these files saxonhe-9.4.0.7\src\main\java\javax\xml\xquery\*: Copyright # 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Oracle. All rights reserved. are licensed under non-free terms: [...] (c) does not modify, subset, superset or otherwise extend those public class or interface declarations whose names begin with Java [...] Cheers, Luca Hi, How is it possible then that [1] package is part of Debian? Its source has same copyright statements. It is pretty much the same package, but before upstream split implementation to free and non-free [2]. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/saxonb.html [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568347#42 __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: findbugs_2.0.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Paul, I find that in src/antTask/edu/umd/cs/findbugs/anttask/FindBugsTask.java, it uses apache1.1, which can not be found in /usr/share/common-license. I can't the license in the upstream, but find it on the internet[1]. So what should I do? Download the license and put it in the debian directory? [1] http://perl.apache.org/start/LICENSE.txt Sincerely Shuxiong Ye On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Paul Richards Tagliamonte ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: Howdy maintainer, I'm sorry, i've had to reject this package, src/antTask/edu/umd/cs/findbugs/anttask/FindBugsTask.java src/gui/edu/umd/cs/findbugs/gui2/CloudCommentsPane.java contains license restrictions that aren't in the copyright. Please fix and reupload Thanks! Paul === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: saxonhe_9.4.0.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: Hi, as discovered in our previous mail exchange, these files saxonhe-9.4.0.7\src\main\java\javax\xml\xquery\*: Copyright # 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Oracle. All rights reserved. are licensed under non-free terms: [...] (c) does not modify, subset, superset or otherwise extend those public class or interface declarations whose names begin with Java [...] Cheers, Luca === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. The new files were uploaded to address your concerns [1]. [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/saxonhe_9.4.0.7.dfsg-1.html Regards, Eugene __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: what is remaining to be able to use apk (android package files) files in debian ?
umm please CC me if somebody answers (sorry for top-posting). On 9/19/13, shirish शिरीष shirisha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Is it possible to use android package files (apk) in debian or still somethings are missing ? I'm talking in a sort of an emulator way on the desktop. These are the android packages I have installed on my system. I am basically interested in a foss rpg which is/was made for android and wanna play on my desktop. http://code.google.com/p/andors-trail/ $ aptitude search android i android-tools-adb- Android Debug Bridge CLI tool i android-tools-fastboot - Android Fastboot protocol CLI tool i android-tools-fsutils- Android ext4 utilities with sparse support i androidsdk-ddms - Graphical debugging tool for Android i androidsdk-hierarchyviewer - Tool to debug and optimize Android user interface i androidsdk-traceview - Tool to profile performance of Android applications i androidsdk-uiautomatorviewer - Tool to scan and analyze the UI components of an Android application p ibus-pinyin-db-android - Pinyin engine for IBus - Android database i libandroid-json-org-java - androids rewrite of the evil licensed json.org p libandroid-json-org-java-doc - Documentation for androids rewrite of the evil licensed json.org i A libandroidsdk-common-java- Android sdk tools common library i A libandroidsdk-ddmlib-java- Library for communicaton with connected Android devices i libandroidsdk-ddmuilib-java - User interface library for ddmlib i A libandroidsdk-hierarchyviewerlib-java- Android Hierarchy Viewer library i libandroidsdk-sdklib-java- Android sdklib i A libandroidsdk-sdkstats-java - Sends Android SDK usage statistics to Google i A libandroidsdk-swtmenubar-java- Android SDK OS menubar hook library Note :- Clueless about the android simulator/emulator but do know that android sdk does have some sort of emulation for android. Looking forward to know more. -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#731009: xmlstarlet: FTBFS on mips: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid profile data
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 731009 by 709950 Bug #731009 [xmlstarlet] xmlstarlet: FTBFS on mips: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid profile data 731009 was not blocked by any bugs. 731009 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 731009: 709950 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 731009: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731009 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#692625: fixed in jenkins-json 2.4-jenkins-1-1
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #692625 {Done: Alastair Irvine alast...@plug.org.au} [src:jenkins-json]
non-free files in upstream tarball (The Software shall be used for Good, not
Evil)
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions jenkins-json/2.4-jenkins-1-1.
notfixed -1 2.4-jenkins-1-1
Bug #692625 [src:jenkins-json] non-free files in upstream tarball (The
Software shall be used for Good, not Evil)
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #692625 to the same values
previously set
--
692625: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692625
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: re: libjansi-native-java: package appears to be unusable
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 708291 minor Bug #708291 [libjansi-native-java] libjansi-native-java: package appears to be unusable Severity set to 'minor' from 'grave' retitle 708291 libjansi-native-java: package description is misleading Bug #708291 [libjansi-native-java] libjansi-native-java: package appears to be unusable Changed Bug title to 'libjansi-native-java: package description is misleading' from 'libjansi-native-java: package appears to be unusable' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 708291: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708291 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#730813: Acknowledgement (libsvnclientadapter-java: svnjavahl-1.so should be provided to better work with eclips-subclipse)
Control: reassign -1 eclipse-subclipse On Vi, 29 nov 13, 14:56:21, crow wrote: nevermind, I see its in libsvn-java and my problem is actually with eclipse not launching java with -Djava.library.path set properly. Adding -Djava.library.path=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/jni to /etc/eclise.ini fixed it reassign eclipse-subclipse On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 19:57 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): unknown-pack...@qa.debian.org If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 730...@bugs.debian.org. Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic http://nuvreauspam.ro/gpg-transition.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#730813: Acknowledgement (libsvnclientadapter-java: svnjavahl-1.so should be provided to better work with eclips-subclipse)
Processing control commands: reassign -1 eclipse-subclipse Bug #730813 [libsvnclientadapter-java] libsvnclientadapter-java: svnjavahl-1.so should be provided to better work with eclips-subclipse Bug reassigned from package 'libsvnclientadapter-java' to 'eclipse-subclipse'. No longer marked as found in versions svnclientadapter/1.8.16-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #730813 to the same values previously set -- 730813: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=730813 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#712882: jaffl FTBFS:build failed on post-compile-test on mips
Processing control commands: tags -1 + patch jessie Bug #712882 [jaffl] jaffl FTBFS:build failed on post-compile-test on mips Added tag(s) jessie and patch. found -1 0.5.9-4 Bug #712882 [jaffl] jaffl FTBFS:build failed on post-compile-test on mips There is no source info for the package 'jaffl' at version '0.5.9-4' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '0.5.9-4' Marked as found in versions 0.5.9-4. -- 712882: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=712882 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug #725456: c3p0: FTBFS: Testsuite hangs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 725456
Bug #725456 {Done: Michael Banck mba...@debian.org} [src:c3p0] c3p0: FTBFS:
Testsuite hangs
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #725456 to the same values
previously set
tags 725456 - unreproducible
Bug #725456 [src:c3p0] c3p0: FTBFS: Testsuite hangs
Removed tag(s) unreproducible.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
725456: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725456
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug #725456: c3p0: FTBFS: Testsuite hangs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 725456 +unreproducible Bug #725456 [src:c3p0] c3p0: FTBFS: Testsuite hangs Added tag(s) unreproducible. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 725456: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725456 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Looking for help to replace some non-free Java code pieces
Hi Giovanni, On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:23:08AM +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: I don't think I'll be able to be much helpful, but let me try. Thanks for your quite verbose answer in any case. Il 05/11/2013 14:24, Andreas Tille ha scritto: Permission to use and/or redistribute this work is granted under the terms of the LGPL License, with the exception that any usage related to military applications is expressly forbidden. The software and documentation made available under the terms of this license are provided with no warranty. How bad... I wonder whether the person who wrote this funny license realized that they were going to strike more normal people like us than military people, which probably would use that code without even checking out the license if they needed. Yep, that's the 'bad-guys-do-whatever-they-want-anyway' attitude. (that said, I'm a quite anti-military guy, but that's hardly the way to go) +1 ... In the specific case, I can't find the non-free pieces of code from hep.aida.* elsewhere than in colt. Thanks for this analysis. I was briefly in contact with FreeHEP authors some years ago. They didn't have much time to answer me at the time and I doubt anything changed (if not in worse), but you can give a try. I was in touch with Marc Donszelmann and Tony Johnson, the first two listed in [3]. [3] http://java.freehep.org/team-list.html Ahhh, at least here is a name match with the authors (Tony Johnson)! I wish you good luck, because I think you'll need much... :-) Thanks. At least now I have a hook to continue my search. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#657700: sweethome3d: Export to SVG doesn't work
Processing control commands: reassign -1 libfreehep-graphicsio-svg-java Bug #657700 [sweethome3d] sweethome3d: Export to SVG doesn't work Bug reassigned from package 'sweethome3d' to 'libfreehep-graphicsio-svg-java'. No longer marked as found in versions 3.4+dfsg-1 and sweethome3d/4.0+dfsg-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #657700 to the same values previously set tags -1 patch Bug #657700 [libfreehep-graphicsio-svg-java] sweethome3d: Export to SVG doesn't work Added tag(s) patch. -- 657700: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=657700 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: libgpars-groovy-java, groovy: error when trying to install together: overwriting /usr/share/groovy/lib/gpars.jar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: owner 728562 ! Bug #728562 [libgpars-groovy-java,groovy] libgpars-groovy-java, groovy: error when trying to install together: overwriting /usr/share/groovy/lib/gpars.jar Owner recorded as Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc. reassign 728562 groovy 2.1.6+dfsg-1 Bug #728562 [libgpars-groovy-java,groovy] libgpars-groovy-java, groovy: error when trying to install together: overwriting /usr/share/groovy/lib/gpars.jar Bug reassigned from package 'libgpars-groovy-java,groovy' to 'groovy'. No longer marked as found in versions 2.1.6+dfsg-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #728562 to the same values previously set Bug #728562 [groovy] libgpars-groovy-java, groovy: error when trying to install together: overwriting /usr/share/groovy/lib/gpars.jar Marked as found in versions groovy/2.1.6+dfsg-1. affects 728562 + libgpars-groovy-java Bug #728562 [groovy] libgpars-groovy-java, groovy: error when trying to install together: overwriting /usr/share/groovy/lib/gpars.jar Added indication that 728562 affects libgpars-groovy-java severity 728562 important Bug #728562 [groovy] libgpars-groovy-java, groovy: error when trying to install together: overwriting /usr/share/groovy/lib/gpars.jar Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 728562: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728562 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#727059: RE: freeplane: Wrong icon appears on GNOME 3 main and left panels
Alessio Paonessa livm...@hotmail.com writes: Hi Felix, hello Alessio, I already tried both, but it doesn't work. It seems a different problem and I don't know if it's inside the 'freplane.desktop' or in the main program. In threads they talk about an issue in the java machine linked to wrong headers, but I'm not able to verify it. If you are able/willing to build a patched version of Freeplane (1.3.x), then we could try this: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6528430 Does the description match what you're seeing? On the other hand, if the above didn't work, I don't see high chances that this will work... How about trying to find help on one of the openjdk lists? http://gmane.org/find.php?list=openjdk (probably http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.awt.devel) (gmane.org is mail2news and news2mail gateway, pretty cool thing :-) Best Regards, -- Felix Natter __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#727059: RE: freeplane: Wrong icon appears on GNOME 3 main and left panels
Hi Felix, If you are able/willing to build a patched version of Freeplane (1.3.x), then we could try this: I'm sorry, but I don't study IT and I don't know what I'd make to the source code. That's why I stopped at the 'freeplane.desktop' file. It's too far from my knowledge in IT. How about trying to find help on one of the openjdk lists? I thought about writing a post in Freeplane forum. Maybe program developers could be the best choice to try the solution listed above. It's the best I can do with my technical skills ;) Best Regards Alessio Paonessa From: fnat...@gmx.net To: livm...@hotmail.com CC: 727...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#727059: RE: freeplane: Wrong icon appears on GNOME 3 main and left panels Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:09:24 +0200 Alessio Paonessa livm...@hotmail.com writes: Hi Felix, hello Alessio, I already tried both, but it doesn't work. It seems a different problem and I don't know if it's inside the 'freplane.desktop' or in the main program. In threads they talk about an issue in the java machine linked to wrong headers, but I'm not able to verify it. If you are able/willing to build a patched version of Freeplane (1.3.x), then we could try this: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6528430 Does the description match what you're seeing? On the other hand, if the above didn't work, I don't see high chances that this will work... How about trying to find help on one of the openjdk lists? http://gmane.org/find.php?list=openjdk (probably http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.awt.devel) (gmane.org is mail2news and news2mail gateway, pretty cool thing :-) Best Regards, -- Felix Natter __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#727059: RE: freeplane: Wrong icon appears on GNOME 3 main and left panels
Alessio Paonessa livm...@hotmail.com writes: Hi Felix, hello Alessio, If you are able/willing to build a patched version of Freeplane (1.3.x), then we could try this: I'm sorry, but I don't study IT and I don't know what I'd make to the source code. That's why I stopped at the 'freeplane.desktop' file. It's too far from my knowledge in IT. Ok, cool that you're into free software then :-) How about trying to find help on one of the openjdk lists? I thought about writing a post in Freeplane forum. Maybe program developers could be the best choice to try the solution listed above. It's the best I can do with my technical skills ;) I am part of the upstream team, and most of the other developers are using Windows. You can try anyway though, there is a (small) chance that other users or devs are experiencing your problem. Best Regards, -- Felix Natter __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#726641: Re: freeplane: No lcdfilter applied on displayed fonts
hi Alessio, glad that this works for you. Just wanted to make you aware that these lines overwrite one another, so in your case, only export _JAVA_OPTIONS='-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=gasp' has an effect. I would like to invite you to join the Freeplane community at https://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/freeplane/viewforum.php?f=1 Can I close this bug? Best Regards, -- Felix Natter __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#727059: RE: freeplane: Wrong icon appears on GNOME 3 main and left panels
Hi Felix, I already tried both, but it doesn't work. It seems a different problem and I don't know if it's inside the 'freplane.desktop' or in the main program. In threads they talk about an issue in the java machine linked to wrong headers, but I'm not able to verify it. Best Regards Alessio Paonessa From: fnat...@gmx.net To: 727...@bugs.debian.org CC: livm...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: freeplane: Wrong icon appears on GNOME 3 main and left panels Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:49:36 +0200 hi Alessio, from the link you posted: http://askubuntu.com/questions/36434/how-can-i-remove-duplicate-icons-for-launched-java-programs-in-the-launcher # run this, then select the freeplane window: $ xprop | grep WM_CLASS # on my system: WM_CLASS(STRING) = sun-awt-X11-XFramePeer, java-lang-Thread = have you tried to modify: /usr/share/applications/freeplane.desktop to add a line: StartupWMClass=sun-awt-X11-XFramePeer or StartupWMClass=java-lang-Thread and logout+login? Best Regards! -- Felix Natter __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#726641: Re: freeplane: No lcdfilter applied on displayed fonts
Dear Felix, Thank you for your answer and suggestions. I added the following lines to the .bashrc and now fonts are looking better: export _JAVA_OPTIONS='-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=on' export _JAVA_OPTIONS='-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=lcd' export _JAVA_OPTIONS='-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=gasp' I also switched to OpenJDK7 and the new Freeplane version and I'll play a little to know it better. Thank you for your time and work! Best Regards __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#725017 closed by Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de (Bug#713144: fixed in freemind 0.9.0+dfsg-3)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 725017
Bug #725017 {Done: Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de} [freemind] freemnd:
ignores keyboard input
Bug #713144 {Done: Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de} [freemind] freemind:
FTBFS: [javac]
/«BUILDDIR»/freemind-0.9.0+dfsg/freemind/freemind/preferences/layout/OptionPanel.java:237:
cannot find symbol
Bug #720388 {Done: Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de} [freemind] freemind:
fails to locate jgoodies ButtonBarFactory class
Bug #720390 {Done: Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de} [freemind] freemind:
showing preferences fails with IllegalAccessError
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions freemind/0.9.0+dfsg-3.
No longer marked as fixed in versions freemind/0.9.0+dfsg-3.
No longer marked as fixed in versions freemind/0.9.0+dfsg-3.
No longer marked as fixed in versions freemind/0.9.0+dfsg-3.
severity 725017 normal
Bug #725017 [freemind] freemnd: ignores keyboard input
Bug #713144 [freemind] freemind: FTBFS: [javac]
/«BUILDDIR»/freemind-0.9.0+dfsg/freemind/freemind/preferences/layout/OptionPanel.java:237:
cannot find symbol
Bug #720388 [freemind] freemind: fails to locate jgoodies ButtonBarFactory class
Bug #720390 [freemind] freemind: showing preferences fails with
IllegalAccessError
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
tags 725017 unreproducible
Bug #725017 [freemind] freemnd: ignores keyboard input
Bug #713144 [freemind] freemind: FTBFS: [javac]
/«BUILDDIR»/freemind-0.9.0+dfsg/freemind/freemind/preferences/layout/OptionPanel.java:237:
cannot find symbol
Bug #720388 [freemind] freemind: fails to locate jgoodies ButtonBarFactory class
Bug #720390 [freemind] freemind: showing preferences fails with
IllegalAccessError
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
713144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=713144
720388: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720388
720390: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720390
725017: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725017
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler
Processing control commands: tags 566901 patch Bug #566901 [libbatik-java] Please split out scripts depending on headed JRE Added tag(s) patch. -- 566901: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566901 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#725461: batik: FTBFS: Unable to find a javac compiler
Processing control commands: tags 566901 patch Bug #566901 [libbatik-java] Please split out scripts depending on headed JRE Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #566901 to the same tags previously set -- 566901: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566901 725461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725461 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: jclassinfo: FTBFS: configure.ac:25: error: required file './compile' not found
Processing control commands: tags -1 +patch Bug #725551 [src:jclassinfo] jclassinfo: FTBFS: configure.ac:25: error: required file './compile' not found Added tag(s) patch. -- 725551: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725551 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
