Processed: Re: Closing fixed bug report
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# adjusting fixed version based on previous mail from Christian PERRIER
notfixed 680404 0.10.0-3
Bug #680404 {Done: Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org} [fop] fails to build
comedilib documentation on mips (java.lang.IllegalArgumentException)
There is no source info for the package 'fop' at version '0.10.0-3' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '0.10.0-3'
No longer marked as fixed in versions 0.10.0-3.
notfound 680404 1:1.0.dfsg2-6
Bug #680404 {Done: Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org} [fop] fails to build
comedilib documentation on mips (java.lang.IllegalArgumentException)
No longer marked as found in versions fop/1:1.0.dfsg2-6.
fixed 680404 1:1.0.dfsg2-6
Bug #680404 {Done: Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org} [fop] fails to build
comedilib documentation on mips (java.lang.IllegalArgumentException)
Marked as fixed in versions fop/1:1.0.dfsg2-6.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
680404: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680404
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#696816: jenkins: Security issues were found in Jenkins core
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 696816 -1 Bug #696816 [jenkins] jenkins: Security issues were found in Jenkins core Bug 696816 cloned as bug 696974 reassign -1 jenkins-winstone 0.9.10-jenkins-37+dfsg-1 Bug #696974 [jenkins] jenkins: Security issues were found in Jenkins core Bug reassigned from package 'jenkins' to 'jenkins-winstone'. No longer marked as found in versions jenkins/1.447.2+dfsg-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #696974 to the same values previously set Bug #696974 [jenkins-winstone] jenkins: Security issues were found in Jenkins core There is no source info for the package 'jenkins-winstone' at version '0.9.10-jenkins-37+dfsg-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '0.9.10-jenkins-37+dfsg-1' Marked as found in versions 0.9.10-jenkins-37+dfsg-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 696816: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696816 696974: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696974 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#686215: geogebra: exporting to asymptote complains File unicodetex not found.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 686215 minor Bug #686215 [geogebra] geogebra: exporting to asymptote complains File unicodetex not found. Severity set to 'minor' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 686215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686215 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#657281: src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf/ sRGB Color Space Profile.icm is non-free [was: Re: Bug#657281: Any news on this?]
On 16/12/2012 14:04, alberto fuentes wrote: Any news on this? Still No :/ Next time, please provide some context in your email ;) Sylvestre __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#657281: src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf/ sRGB Color Space Profile.icm is non-free [was: Re: Bug#657281: Any news on this?]
Sorry about that :) I did not blindly ping the bug. Since its being a while without response and we are getting closer to release, i was thinking about requesting a wheezy-ignore for the bug or something to the release team What do you think about that? On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.orgwrote: On 16/12/2012 14:04, alberto fuentes wrote: Any news on this? Still No :/ Next time, please provide some context in your email ;) Sylvestre __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#657281: src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf/ sRGB Color Space Profile.icm is non-free [was: Re: Bug#657281: Any news on this?]
On 17/12/2012 00:42, alberto fuentes wrote: Sorry about that :) No worries Since its being a while without response and we are getting closer to release, i was thinking about requesting a wheezy-ignore for the bug or something to the release team What do you think about that? I am OK for the wheezy-ignore... Thanks for the ping, Sylvestre __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#695251: tomcat7: CVE-2012-4431 CVE-2012-4534 CVE-2012-3546
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 695251 tomcat7: CVE-2012-4431 CVE-2012-3546 Bug #695251 [tomcat7] tomcat7: CVE-2012-4431 CVE-2012-4534 CVE-2012-3546 Changed Bug title to 'tomcat7: CVE-2012-4431 CVE-2012-3546' from 'tomcat7: CVE-2012-4431 CVE-2012-4534 CVE-2012-3546' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 695251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695251 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#673606: 7.2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 673606 netbeans: new version available (7.2.1) Bug #673606 [netbeans] netbeans: new version available (7.1.2) Changed Bug title to 'netbeans: new version available (7.2.1)' from 'netbeans: new version available (7.1.2)' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 673606: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673606 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: eclipse-subclipse_1.8.16-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Tony, I made an update to eclipse-subclipse d/copyright based on problems pointed out by Luca. Could you please reupload[1]? Regards, Jakub [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/eclipse-subclipse.git On 14.11.2012 23:00, Luca Falavigna wrote: Hi, some files under org.tigris.subversion.subclipse.tests/ are licensed under different licenses than those listed in copyright file (e.g. Apache amd CPL). Cheers, Luca __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: eclipse-subclipse_1.8.16-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Yes. I'll be able to do this tonight (US West Coast). On 11/15/2012 08:25 AM, Jakub Adam wrote: Hi Tony, I made an update to eclipse-subclipse d/copyright based on problems pointed out by Luca. Could you please reupload[1]? Regards, Jakub [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/eclipse-subclipse.git On 14.11.2012 23:00, Luca Falavigna wrote: Hi, some files under org.tigris.subversion.subclipse.tests/ are licensed under different licenses than those listed in copyright file (e.g. Apache amd CPL). Cheers, Luca __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Errors in Package Homepage entries
Simon Kainz: Hi! I know, this should normally be filed as a bug, but would result in some kind of mass bug filing which I think can be avoided. Please take a look at http://duck.debian.net/index.php?maintainer=pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alio th.debian.org There are currently ~100 packages with broken ord wrong Homepage entries - most of them seem to got currupted on some kind of server restructuring, eg. https://tablelayout.dev.java.net/ (whic his broken) vs. http://java.net/projects/TableLayout (which works) - the same for e.g SwingX. If it's better to file bugs against the packages to not break to usual workflow i'll glady do, but I think it might be easyier/less fuzz this way. Forward to Debian-Java Hi Simon, I'd prefer a minor bug against each package. The next time somebody updates the package, he/she will also scan the bugs list and not forget to update the homepage field. Regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: jspwiki does depend on tomcat6
Processing control commands: notfound -1 2.8.0-5 Bug #656153 [jspwiki] jspwiki: postinst failure: chown: invalid user: `tomcat6' No longer marked as found in versions jspwiki/2.8.0-5. fixed -1 2.8.0-5 Bug #656153 [jspwiki] jspwiki: postinst failure: chown: invalid user: `tomcat6' Marked as fixed in versions jspwiki/2.8.0-5. close -1 Bug #656153 [jspwiki] jspwiki: postinst failure: chown: invalid user: `tomcat6' Marked Bug as done -- 656153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656153 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#679616: jenkins: Please package a more recent upstream version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 25/10/12 00:42, Antoine Beaupré wrote: I think this should also be updated to the latest LTS, at least before the wheezy release. A freeze exception shouldn't be a problem considering the issues fixed are all critical and / or security: http://jenkins-ci.org/changelog-stable I am therefore pushing the severity here and if people agree, I'll file a freeze exception once the package hits unstable. The security issues identified have already been backported to the version in testing - please see the latest changelog entries. I don't think an upgrade is feasible now as the LTS changelog only documents the fixes made in the LTS releases - but the first version of a LTS release also includes every change and fix between the last and current LTS in trunk as well. The delta as a result is huge. - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQiPaVAAoJEL/srsug59jD5QcQAIsShT+5vifPmuJZAJWcDNo6 AD7L/PQ8t0XBy9rmPxEMPOIzJiICdv1RBI/B7WoSZOvmg/+/pGMIrW1i0q0hodKW I/OHprHSlINSEXiDiCkzfFBYyDOon0eOvukYIUrQwZ38eGxMSJkbm2hD1fKG3JMO igldEpwMTvt2vo4r3/pwIeO7Cj1GKav3vQfDWTckwQoHdFvASyp4lNJsK5e5R4Sa HmQm1vrjD6u0QQhatp08rCijiZAK2ZjaXe9wDRG51PxxEcPNYo2xfRRYpHjU6tR8 uiMor6jKwlm8Gez+r33C9v3tZyXh3K5WVXaRu2LgOBWDTXuE5/zKIx5rrVN7TU/s nIVg301Sv1ZVqbltSYsiJ5Ed2cLHEHoShrSgZQXytYRAXxT7uNzHs4gyYRohUB7Z kWs6sAdYxCtLIQY8ZcIkunub+QtM+Aeb1JHJGPqSk6Dm3zE+E8QBvpEt13PJVBX0 jwpwsCl73+qV5S9rKcK8c+/nnX5eGRentKAVZDqGuu9AYGDgvVVE8pnxApsStyQO eOGLl9zKild8aRF1HzmzL5N07yfI6jX3DRmzIBgo4WTv97QvMoZR5B4CixG6QpLG Mn3XO8HRmA1uGTll8li7+NgqTz7LVauOBm5w396TojYnWh5Vz83SzbkP8PTxMRqc kIxyLh+xWhgdw7ig4e0A =quEX -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#691203: Missing B-D to ant
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 691202 + unreproducible Bug #691202 [libswingx1-java] Missing B-D to cdbs Added tag(s) unreproducible. tags 691203 + unreproducible Bug #691203 [libswingx1-java] Missing B-D to ant Added tag(s) unreproducible. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 691202: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691202 691203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691203 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#690204: ca-certificates{, -java}: many errors during squeeze-wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration order and update.d/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
merge 690204 537051
Bug #690204 [ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java] ca-certificates{, -java}:
many errors during squeeze-wheezy upgrades, probably related to configuration
order and update.d/
Unable to merge bugs because:
severity of #537051 is 'normal' not 'serious'
package of #537051 is 'ca-certificates' not
'ca-certificates,ca-certificates-java'
Failed to merge 690204: Did not alter merged bugs
Debbugs::Control::set_merged('transcript', 'GLOB(0x17e9300)',
'requester', 'Michael Shuler mich...@pbandjelly.org', 'request_addr',
'cont...@bugs.debian.org', 'request_msgid',
'50771024.1030...@pbandjelly.org', 'request_subject', ...) called at
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 537
eval {...} called at
/usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Control/Service.pm line 536
Debbugs::Control::Service::control_line('line', undef, 'clonebugs',
'HASH(0x170f3f8)', 'limit', 'HASH(0x170e8d8)', 'common_control_options',
'ARRAY(0x170e920)', 'errors', ...) called at /usr/lib/debbugs/service line 474
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
537051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537051
690204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690204
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Assertion failure in ecj-gcj on hurd-i386
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# unconfuse debbugs
notfound 563230 ecj/3.5.1
Bug #563230 {Done: Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se} [ecj-gcj]
Assertion failure in ecj-gcj on hurd-i386
The source ecj and version 3.5.1 do not appear to match any binary packages
No longer marked as found in versions ecj/3.5.1-1.
notfixed 563230 ecj-gcj/3.5.1
Bug #563230 {Done: Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se} [ecj-gcj]
Assertion failure in ecj-gcj on hurd-i386
The source ecj-gcj and version 3.5.1 do not appear to match any binary packages
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #563230 to the same values
previously set
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
563230: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563230
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Assertion failure in ecj-gcj on hurd-i386
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfixed 563230 ecj-gcj/3.5.1-1
Bug #563230 {Done: Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se} [ecj-gcj]
Assertion failure in ecj-gcj on hurd-i386
The source ecj-gcj and version 3.5.1-1 do not appear to match any binary
packages
No longer marked as fixed in versions ecj-gcj/3.5.1-1.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
563230: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563230
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#689875: sweethome3d: unavailable dependency (sweethome3d-furnitures)
Processing control commands: severity -1 grave Bug #689875 [sweethome3d] sweethome3d: unavailable dependency (sweethome3d-furnitures) Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' notfound -1 3.5+dfsg-1 Bug #689875 [sweethome3d] sweethome3d: unavailable dependency (sweethome3d-furnitures) No longer marked as found in versions sweethome3d/3.5+dfsg-1. found -1 3.6+dfsg-2 Bug #689875 [sweethome3d] sweethome3d: unavailable dependency (sweethome3d-furnitures) Marked as found in versions sweethome3d/3.6+dfsg-2. -- 689875: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689875 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: felix-gogo-command: Install .jar into /usr/share/java to comply with Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 689395 + pending Bug #689395 [felix-gogo-command] felix-gogo-command: Install .jar into /usr/share/java to comply with Debian Added tag(s) pending. severity 689395 serious Bug #689395 [felix-gogo-command] felix-gogo-command: Install .jar into /usr/share/java to comply with Debian Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689395: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689395 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: google contacts 3.0
Hey tony, Apologies for the late reply. On 21.09.12, 20:59, tony wrote: On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:22:55PM +0200, Emil Ivov wrote: Hey all, We are currently preparing Jitsi for a Debian submission and are trying to bind to our various dependences. One thing that we are currently having trouble with is Google Contacts Jitsi uses version 3.0.1 and the one in Debian's libgdata-java seems to be 2.0.1. Are there any plans regarding an update? Hello Emil, Where are you finding a package for 2.0.1? When I look at the PTS for libgdata-java, I only see 1.30.0 [1]. Right, libgdata-java 1.30.0 actually contains what Google otherwise distribute as Google Contacts 2.0.1. In other words, if I am not mistaken, we would need libgdata-java to be 1.43.0 which contains Google Contacts 3.0.0. Also, the package only appears in lenny and squeeze, having been removed from unstable and testing earlier this year. Does this mean there's no chance of it getting back? Assuming we're talking about the same library, you could file a RFP bug for the package. OK done. Haven't had the number yet though. Thanks, Emil Cheers, tony [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libg/libgdata-java.html [2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libg/libgdata-java/news/20120127T170744Z.html -- https://jitsi.org __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Incomplete upload found in Debian upload queue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 25/09/12 12:13, Debian FTP Masters wrote: Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in the Debian upload queue directory: jenkins_1.447.2+dfsg-2.debian.tar.gz jenkins_1.447.2+dfsg-2.dsc This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job cannot be processed. If no .changes file arrives within 23:20:27, the files will be deleted. [...] that was me network connection dropped whilst doing a large upload... - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQYaNfAAoJEL/srsug59jDxNMQAIMaOG6gtzmMzqvNEwMwsMSA k2mN9L351RKAg7QA04G4N6IsS+xHIdAyEEAvDEPnI8zmfaIgORS7ce4IB8PzIiMe Hp0RsgUA5f1tPcnq1zM8SqZhGJCyiT4PJn2Y+HIjyHvu9LX/6MrCRbbyAIDJHX/m VFEZkvmv+ZYH/siQk+Y2A46/vNgrXgQoQr4Q4O62mzcYz8n61MzKtlcVexpUGuTu Dcg/iPwxjKSWq4BAatdB1cMB+Y3N69yWR77oetlcarozoKawwBZMVLqBrlLzw1W5 CpP5hH3sBbBeL5U3a0RDndqwgSHCx5t7oA9oPU8sf7JRV1Uonoifd+7l80FW5maj ebVMOr0ZlC1VmkbYqqHyidT9mbSYWK/JxqYCnu9EasgeIoQA9GNRwuNpOoZlcIW0 CRa8SZ9TLZvVARYvBcamvcpyO4ox5pMY1Zd41LIwgvpDRxVgIHzlTNxTbTk1x8lX W4XFx2rVPvLjXcPIS5r0+EExgLUP2pMBGRKsOd9LDLVkEOgFXaMTaGehX2nyk8bF qaxDoP30Cw2y45G9lIo7kPAAtkHhsZUcnwSHTmNeRvgye8voxZz1p4YYVjtMzrIs Et6LpSKOnodOjbpOZb2QcIIn5G+c9H0El0dy2Yc/jFGNJXzOOSpvTP76ezR1Z5We 8mIKayufDbx3NW0Vhw5G =YV8L -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#635964: pdfsam Re: Bug#635964: New version still not available
Hi Tom, 1.1.4 is in the archive, so at least the pre-2.0 series of pdfsam seems covered. I recall to have looked at the never version a while back. It has a series of additional build dependencies. No idea how far the packaging of those has progressed in the meantime. It was not trivial, so much I recall. I am afraid that my hunch is that there are some extra hands needed. Could you possibly help out? Would you have some peers with whom to save the work, possibly? Many greetings Steffen Original-Nachricht Datum: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:18:35 +0200 Von: third-imp...@gmx.de An: 635...@bugs.debian.org Betreff: Bug#635964: New version still not available I've just checked and the new version of of pdfsam is still not available though it contains significant enhancements. Version 1.1.4 has been released in 2009, version 2.2.1 in 2010 and the package has still not been updated. Regards, Tom __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Thanks for packaging tomcat7!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 19/09/12 00:32, Miguel Landaeta wrote: (Not reporting this as a formal bug because it's trivial.) There are not trivial bugs! Thanks anyway for bringing our attention to the issue, I already fixed the typo. It will get fixed eventually when development of new Debian release begins and new packages will get uploaded. This difference will be dropped once the new Debian release begins; it already has been in Ubuntu (but it missed the freeze for wheezy). - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQWYV2AAoJEL/srsug59jDipYQALOTqSeAoxcDhxDNU4jZfb3a M/kKKmrqJZDiWK8Y3Eb649QirFq+qG3AYfY92b/KMb6oWpxafI37UWVrqt2jTO+D WukW/QTQHKxqSYufvrZdfAJCkHzqn5v/F5vTtkuG/FzG+5HzArmH424DOLCWmtvh 55vrWLKgH3ouhdlsJP9ulJXcgOSH23oAQI0wxI7NMMtA6pp0AQ9sRi4ZU7eBXdJ+ gH4GUNOkqZhgWqhtLpiJC90uj4+4BXvwadoeuiAhifPd+y6gohoI0MJPF0svTUwi GNLAoP3UF4oWYf1Q/L87dwfOIzgqR4HkqfxBu6Dm+ExCITJ171F4Yz5X8Tocg1bo h9wvtdfmYUYXQcYRVsFop+5eSQ9HVXBgQDGKSt/RfneKq98qo2KSgpcj+KxZafWk KXdaVT/3YNQopn/LnSR9lYDfvCEN+PTrziPesJsrTByHjZdzEPETpqeqmkqml/+N HT+/a+ep+BpoCt6UueE4zzaVtLbrGUgVSqMkGUubYWq/qDlIoopBXv+pf2Ag6MSE /U0HQjc6CWwKx1MpZmybLaGaNm0pinDJpDBIQv8L5tt4KE3UZAqpmvEwv5GkhG5H dQIIgtMl3aQXgGWJff37GUv6Vpvjjg97DARLMqS9qLE5LDB5ibBlPC6oVUlHPCbK BbEKwQktKE75AVORcC22 =LkGI -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: jruby: CVE-2011-4838
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 686867 patch Bug #686867 [jruby] jruby: CVE-2011-4838 Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 686867: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686867 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Thanks for packaging tomcat7!
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Trent W. Buck trentb...@gmail.com wrote: (Not reporting this as a formal bug because it's trivial.) There are not trivial bugs! Thanks anyway for bringing our attention to the issue, I already fixed the typo. It will get fixed eventually when development of new Debian release begins and new packages will get uploaded. Regards. -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/ Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#453021: fixed in mockobjects 0.09-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package groovy
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'groovy'
Limit currently set to 'package':'groovy'
fixed 453021 groovy/1.5.6-1
Bug #453021 {Done: Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org} [groovy] groovy:
package is uninstallable
Marked as fixed in versions groovy/1.5.6-1.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
453021: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=453021
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#685082: fixed in java-package 0.51~exp1
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #685082 {Done: Cédric Pineau cedric.pin...@gmail.com} [java-package]
debconf abuse
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions java-package/0.51~exp1.
severity serious
tags -1 wheezy sid
Bug #685082 [java-package] debconf abuse
Added tag(s) sid and wheezy.
--
685082: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685082
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: make-jpkg fails
Hello, I'm following this guide http://wiki.debian.org/JavaPackage I'm using debian squeeze I have no problem with : /apt-get install java-package/ But when executing one of this command with the archives I retrieved on the oracle website : /make-jpkg jre-7u6-linux-i586.tar.gz make-jpkg jdk-7u6-linux-i586.tar.gz make-jpkg jre-6u34-linux-i586.bin make-jpkg jdk-6u34-linux-i586.bin/ I have tons of messages like this : /dpkg-shlibdeps : warning: Can't extract name and version from library name .../ And finally the process always stop with this error : /Undefined subroutine main::get_buildoption called at /usr/bin/dh_builddeb line 69./ Any idea of what I am missing ? /make-jpkg/ was written in perl, should I install any specific perl module ? Adam For information the error was generated because I had an outdated version of debhelper. Sorry for the annoyance. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Is sun-java6 6.26-0squeeze1 vulnerable to CVE-2012-1723?
On 2012-08-14 23:16, Kevin wrote: Sorry if this has been addressed elsewhere. I searched the list and bug reports and didn't see anything. I'm running Squeeze and today Iceweasel informed me that Java Plug-in 1.6.0_26 is insecure and recommended disabling it. Versions below 1.6.0_33 or between 1.7.0 and 1.7.0_5 are now in the Mozilla blocklist: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/blocked/p119 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780717 My question is, is sun-java6 6.26-0squeeze1 vulnerable to CVE-2012-1723? If yes, this is a bug against sun-java6 to update the package. If no, I need to file a bug against mozilla's blocklist for incorrectly flagging this version as insecure. Thanks, Kevin Hi, It is quite possible that sun-java6 is vulnerable to that CVE; I haven't checked. The problem is that we cannot do anything about it as we do not have permission to distribute updates for sun-java6[1]... ~Niels [1] http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2011/08/26/sun_java6_packages_removed_from_debian_u __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Is sun-java6 6.26-0squeeze1 vulnerable to CVE-2012-1723?
It is quite possible that sun-java6 is vulnerable to that CVE; I haven't checked. The problem is that we cannot do anything about it as we do not have permission to distribute updates for sun-java6[1]... Thanks for the explanation. I understand this package has been dropped from testing and unstable. Is there a way other than the Mozilla blocklist to inform Squeeze users that they are running an insecure package? Since I'm running stable and this package is still present in the repository, I assumed it was still receiving security updates. Forgive me if this is a naive question, but should the package be removed from stable so users are not unwittingly given a false sense of security? Thanks, Kevin -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Send your email first class __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: please also package extensions (e.g. assistedinject)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 683644 + pending Bug #683644 [libguice-java] please also package extensions (e.g. assistedinject) Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 683644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683644 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#669384: jxplorer: simple authentification (user + password)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 669384 normal Bug #669384 [jxplorer] jxplorer: simple authentification (user + password) unavailable Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' reassign 669384 openjdk-6-jre Bug #669384 [jxplorer] jxplorer: simple authentification (user + password) unavailable Bug reassigned from package 'jxplorer' to 'openjdk-6-jre'. No longer marked as found in versions jxplorer/3.2.1+dfsg-5. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #669384 to the same values previously set retitle 669384 jre6 doesn't detect alt-gr keystrokes Bug #669384 [openjdk-6-jre] jxplorer: simple authentification (user + password) unavailable Changed Bug title to 'jre6 doesn't detect alt-gr keystrokes' from 'jxplorer: simple authentification (user + password) unavailable' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 669384: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669384 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Fwd: Re: Bug#683993: sweethome3d crashes with java-6-openjdk-amd64, works with java-6-sun
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 683993 important Bug #683993 [sweethome3d] sweethome3d crashes with java-6-openjdk-amd64, works with java-6-sun Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' retitle 683993 sh3d crashes with openjre6+IntelHD4000, works with jre7 Bug #683993 [sweethome3d] sweethome3d crashes with java-6-openjdk-amd64, works with java-6-sun Changed Bug title to 'sh3d crashes with openjre6+IntelHD4000, works with jre7' from 'sweethome3d crashes with java-6-openjdk-amd64, works with java-6-sun' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 683993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683993 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#608286: CVE-2010-4312: does not use HTTPOnly for session cookies by default
On 07/27/2012 04:08 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Hi, However, this is not a vulnerability, only extra hardening which is surely useful but not a vulnerability in itself. I'm therefore downgrading this bug to minor: the request to update the README.Debian. Thank you for looking into this bug. I shouldn't have let this one go for so long, but honestly, I'm not sure about the text to add to the package readme. Can you propose appropriate wording to add to README.Debian. Would it be sufficient to reference the CVE and include a link (say, to [1])? See attached patch for a change to README.Debian. I've tested it and confirmed that it has the desired effect. Please apply it to the repository; I'm not sure that a separate upload to wheezy is warranted for this but if you're going to make an upload before the release please be sure to include this aswell. Cheers, Thijs Applied - thank you! tony __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#683631: please install maven artifacts
On 08/04/2012 12:15 PM, Andrew Ross wrote: On 04/08/12 19:19, Thomas Koch wrote: Andrew Ross: On 02/08/12 13:00, Thomas Koch wrote: Package: libpostgresql-jdbc-java Version: 9.1-901-1 Severity: normal Hi, please install the maven artifacts to /usr/share/maven-repo. The plan is to get the upload I've prepared into Wheezy, since it provides transitional packages to ease the move to the new package names. To maximise the chance it'll be accepted I'd rather not include any other changes for now. After Wheezy is released then there's also a new upstream minor version to update to, since it fixes some performance issues too. Uploaded. Thank you, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#683197: xmlto: incorrect formatting of large footnote (body and footnote overlap)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 683197 fop Bug #683197 [xmlto] xmlto: incorrect formatting of large footnote (body and footnote overlap) Bug reassigned from package 'xmlto' to 'fop'. No longer marked as found in versions xmlto/0.0.23-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #683197 to the same values previously set found 683197 1:0.95.dfsg-11 Bug #683197 [fop] xmlto: incorrect formatting of large footnote (body and footnote overlap) Marked as found in versions fop/1:0.95.dfsg-11. found 683197 1:1.0.dfsg2-6 Bug #683197 [fop] xmlto: incorrect formatting of large footnote (body and footnote overlap) Marked as found in versions fop/1:1.0.dfsg2-6. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 683197: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683197 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#678904: fixed in bouncycastle 1.46+dfsg-6
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 06:02:14PM +, Brian Thomason wrote: Source: bouncycastle Source-Version: 1.46+dfsg-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of bouncycastle, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. Hi Brian, Please don't forget to commit your changes on this package to svn. Also remember to tag all your releases in the repo. Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, miguel at miguel.cc secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/ Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: sqljet_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On 2012-07-29 00:56, Jakub Adam wrote: Hi Niels, I packaged new upstream of sqljet and addressed the problems found by FTP masters: On 28.7.2012 12:59, Luca Falavigna wrote: * sqljet-distribution/src/main/site/prettify.* lack source, they're minified stuff. Either provide the uncompressed form, or drop them from the tarball. Removed both files as they are not really needed for package build, in d/README.source I mentioned where to get the prettify sources in case anyone will want them. * d/README.Debian-source: this really should be d/README.source. The information is great, but README.source is the canonical location for this kind of stuff. Renamed. Could you, please, reupload the fixed package [1]? Regards, Jakub [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/sqljet.git Done, :) ~Niels __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: sqljet_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Niels, I packaged new upstream of sqljet and addressed the problems found by FTP masters: On 28.7.2012 12:59, Luca Falavigna wrote: * sqljet-distribution/src/main/site/prettify.* lack source, they're minified stuff. Either provide the uncompressed form, or drop them from the tarball. Removed both files as they are not really needed for package build, in d/README.source I mentioned where to get the prettify sources in case anyone will want them. * d/README.Debian-source: this really should be d/README.source. The information is great, but README.source is the canonical location for this kind of stuff. Renamed. Could you, please, reupload the fixed package [1]? Regards, Jakub [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/sqljet.git __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Eclipse bump request
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Bhaavan Merchant bhaavanmerch...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to request eclipse 4.2 to be included in the debian packages as part of experimental. ( I was told that it cannot come to unstable till the release of wheezy). I am new to debian, and would like to help / assist in this job if required. Do let me know if I can help in any way. (I have given a read to http://wiki.debian.org/IntroDebianPackaging. Do tell me if there are other resources I must study for this.) Hi Bhaavan, You should get in touch with current Eclipse maintainers. You will find their contact information at http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/eclipse.html. Additionally, you should get familiar with the packaging. You can find the sources at git://git.debian.org/git/pkg-java/eclipse.git. Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at gmail.com secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://keyserver.pgp.com/ Faith means not wanting to know what is true. -- Nietzsche __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: make money online easy and trust.
*make money online easy and trust.* *we get money many times, trust and credibility.* *wish you make more money.* * * *find out here http://adf.ly/Ajgcg* *more http://adf.ly/AYe94* * * __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Current status of grails
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # libradeox-java doesn't block grails packaging anymore unblock 473213 by 453471 Bug #473213 [wnpp] ITP: grails -- An open-source web application framework that leverages the Groovy language 473213 was blocked by: 608284 575877 589501 587832 608285 453471 473213 was not blocking any bugs. Removed blocking bug(s) of 473213: 453471 block 473213 by 667077 Bug #473213 [wnpp] ITP: grails -- An open-source web application framework that leverages the Groovy language 473213 was blocked by: 608284 575877 589501 608285 587832 473213 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 473213: 667077 and 667078 block 473213 by 637273 Bug #473213 [wnpp] ITP: grails -- An open-source web application framework that leverages the Groovy language 473213 was blocked by: 608284 667077 575877 589501 587832 608285 667078 473213 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 473213: 642781 and 637273 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 473213: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473213 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#679616: jenkins: Please package a more recent upstream version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 30/06/12 10:54, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: Le samedi 30 juin 2012 09:57:09, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : Source: jenkins Severity: wishlist Hello, Could you consider to package a more recent version of Jenkins ? We are currently shipping 1.447 and upstream is 1.472 Actually 1.447.x is upstream LTS chanel for stable release. Maybe we should stick with it during Wheezy release cycle ? The policy I have taken with this package is to track the LTS release rather than the main TRUNK release from upstream - its generally more stable and has an upstream commitment for backporting of critical/security fixes. So I think sticking with 1.447.2 (latest LTS) is the correct thing todo for wheezy. - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP8WI2AAoJEL/srsug59jDSCMP/3FtRDAvsCsnOWYaiQfJFh5h CsuTKTZQufT1NJVThEtHxUJoc88SVAVtmL97U4q/1NHY2N3mCiupsDFZfIfYpN6P V0zSDwoZgm0FFM9SHeXjIfeWCCj9T1jSJNOunnEiqE35qnnC+y7SQCqFgeyBmpeP 2CF0i3kQuiZ2jQ+2AJrMb1XLucNtBQi0/ii/dZJz++rl+D0AaSc/GDHGwVwLu/Fi WgLoOrxm0hv0hXAtrPXWlqUUTGWONXaAJDbZos2Jq8qUdCfoBJjTxA7uL8LacZo7 8UvQ7QVE1o2pgzBSd6uBt4dzjXOtlFwm9J063gRW5l26U8p7vtReD0gb1sSchIRT IVGwenD4I3xB6CYiQgeo0wu0kY7ANj1wMWUMT2pc1s3clgbLZW/Iev66Kgy6r7Ej dR1e2bQH1dAxSSb/hWogc9fERd64cNE2BBHEaJlsE//nuLhz/Vts7WT2snaffgmB YYbp/ydPvA4QQmLQxwRhLKi/T/PFPa90ileTyEc+b1kmQeeyJaN5Ii7DdA7TZoQy zaERbXKJvlBh92edP/2LIoJVniqDgPEWzFosXX+63i244kKpoeQ0qpIPqIIZCrLE 5aseJV9VBmJZAX621gNVpbInD+Lin1jP8KZ8OyL1y2XN+QKaVDyzXiIUJalSQRgC /olQosfG5e74GYRf0T9O =BKwq -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Status of Solr and Lucene in Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Tomas On 22/06/12 05:43, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: On a very short note now, more perhaps in four weeks (I'm away and no net connectivity til 23 of July). My boss offered that I work on that for 1..2 hours a week on company time. I'm aware that it will be far more than this at the beginning, so the difference will go to my account. But I'm seriously considering to take the plunge, unless someone beats me to it More at the end of July I've picked up the maintenance of solr; I've closed out most bug reports on solr 1.4 and have just had a new lucene-solr package for 3.6.0 uploaded to the NEW queue (thanks Tony). Always happy to have a co-maintainer so help much appreciated! Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu Core Developer Debian Maintainer james.p...@ubuntu.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP5F2rAAoJEL/srsug59jDPrAQAMstGwVgRQh4hOMa+aV0AeRd Jbqf22PYjCzJEvNU81+SoiBOvijlPSKyBVcphkLfDhiu2lnhFnX+JK4eOX25Krrh DBwLjmqslBlChuhBnqBzPYE1H/OmoIjL9wqOo2cSXz75IEf7TbQs7Pgs/Z02FyLd bUoFre/yO6QtL65kOXWdomovg4BmNRg5ngAhHRY/ZGOkE4pVbV8JcOMbMQAJ3OK5 YH5qVE5PkqoohrnWYFam1oGOaAHAMPU4wUiv9YBLyiNA/65P5o2ItbHvShQnCH01 b+f0Y551LfSQBGodjpcvmjFN5/H4j6/QCxTEuDcUaGbkrqsTkxunLVtODtlim3Oc XOpQZdnnABCPP88B8Y7khDU1tm4KBwv4SbOgYRiyYPdy1zzY1PURc6pRM2E4FkTP CbDliPrQDzKwtHZ7/b8Act4zy7fEbebE/Gd7SfOymUKWq8B7VREkhU6jOhYDXIfs gIozdeCTzeE2DlQ6rmmLquG4MYwxvthtnUpAeDvmqtzqDIrqkro2Iq0KWwyPQ1eU 8OdsosyiP67BHFmud3O3IejPBwk5/EDKRCHcLko+w84A4qyiUFB+cO1tZVEuagp7 kFPXsvknGcotMuD1DF3PaGxMFw2nX+KjFnRYiqxCrXlXIB2V/47yBm3JcekkOGYL NYrJvlo1fxszkjClWtRO =bP0a -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Status of Solr and Lucene in Debian
to...@tuxteam.de: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 07:58:19PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote: to...@tuxteam.de: But Solr is orphaned for a while now with nobody interested to maintain [...] I started learning the Java ecosystem myself by upgrading Solr and packaging Hadoop. However learning Debian packaging and then Java packaging isn't done in a couple of hours. On the other hand you'll really learn a lot about the system that you're using. On a very short note now, more perhaps in four weeks (I'm away and no net connectivity til 23 of July). My boss offered that I work on that for 1..2 hours a week on company time. I'm aware that it will be far more than this at the beginning, so the difference will go to my account. But I'm seriously considering to take the plunge, unless someone beats me to it More at the end of July Regards -- tomás Hi Tomas, thank you for your motivation. However James Page is already working on updates Solr/Lucene packages. But I'm sure that there can be found something to work on in collaboration. Regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Status of Solr and Lucene in Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 07:58:19PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote: to...@tuxteam.de: But Solr is orphaned for a while now with nobody interested to maintain [...] I started learning the Java ecosystem myself by upgrading Solr and packaging Hadoop. However learning Debian packaging and then Java packaging isn't done in a couple of hours. On the other hand you'll really learn a lot about the system that you're using. On a very short note now, more perhaps in four weeks (I'm away and no net connectivity til 23 of July). My boss offered that I work on that for 1..2 hours a week on company time. I'm aware that it will be far more than this at the beginning, so the difference will go to my account. But I'm seriously considering to take the plunge, unless someone beats me to it More at the end of July Regards - -- tomás -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFP4/ffBcgs9XrR2kYRAmNgAJ41ovcNrSXsiE0iIfBCta93nMBEygCdFrPy q4d+7qws/D32h5BE0jPuwT8= =Bv5s -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#677974: eclipse-egit: FTBFS with eclipse 3.8.0 (git version)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Reproduced in sid chroot severity 677974 serious Bug #677974 [eclipse-egit] eclipse-egit: FTBFS with eclipse 3.8.0 (git version) Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' retitle 677974 eclipse-egit: FTBFS OSGi dependency issues Bug #677974 [eclipse-egit] eclipse-egit: FTBFS with eclipse 3.8.0 (git version) Changed Bug title to 'eclipse-egit: FTBFS OSGi dependency issues' from 'eclipse-egit: FTBFS with eclipse 3.8.0 (git version)' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677974: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677974 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: ini4j: Builds broken package from source
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 670671 + pending Bug #670671 [src:ini4j] ini4j: Builds broken package from source Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 670671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670671 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: CVE-2012-2098
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 674448 + pending Bug #674448 [libcommons-compress-java] CVE-2012-2098 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 674448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674448 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: tomcat7: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 677912 + pending Bug #677912 [tomcat6] tomcat6: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation Added tag(s) pending. tags 677913 + pending Bug #677913 [tomcat7] tomcat7: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677912: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677912 677913: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677913 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: codenarc: FTBFS: java error
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 655807 + pending Bug #655807 [src:codenarc] codenarc: FTBFS: java error Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 655807: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655807 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: CVE-2012-2672
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 677194 + moreinfo Bug #677194 [mojarra] CVE-2012-2672 Added tag(s) moreinfo. severity 677194 important Bug #677194 [mojarra] CVE-2012-2672 Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 677194: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677194 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#652232: checkstyle: FTBFS: Tests run: 676, Failures: 372, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 654002 + pending Bug #654002 [checkstyle] Updating the checkstyle Uploaders list Added tag(s) pending. tags 652232 + pending Bug #652232 [src:checkstyle] checkstyle: FTBFS: Tests run: 676, Failures: 372, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 652232: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652232 654002: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654002 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: jnr-netdb: missing --java-lib in POM file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 676353 + pending Bug #676353 [jnr-netdb] jnr-netdb: missing --java-lib in POM file Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 676353: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676353 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: trove3_3.0.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Hello Luca, some files have the following license header: // Copyright (c) 1999 CERN - European Organization for Nuclear Research. // Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute and sell this software and // its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, // provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that // both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in // supporting documentation. CERN makes no representations about the // suitability of this software for any purpose. It is provided as is // without expressed or implied warranty Please adjust your copyright file. The copyright file *already* included (after the main license, copied from upstream): --- The PrimeFinder and HashFunctions classes in Trove are subject to the following license restrictions: Copyright (c) 1999 CERN - European Organization for Nuclear Research. Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute and sell this software and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation. CERN makes no representations about the suitability of this software for any purpose. It is provided as is without expressed or implied warranty. --- Is this not sufficient, or did you miss it because it was below the main LGPL statement? Regards, Erich __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: trove3_3.0.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED
Hello Java team,
Reject Reasons:
'dpkg-source -x' failed for trove3_3.0.2-1.dsc. (Command '('dpkg-source',
'--no-copy', '--no-check', '-q', '-x', 'trove3_3.0.2-1.dsc',
'/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/tmp/tmpEWgHjK/root')' returned non-zero exit
status 9)
Any idea what might be causing this? The same command in the upload
folder worked.
The trove3 packages are in SVN, forked from the existing trove folder.
There are two more things I want to check before trying another
upload. But as it might fail again as above - any idea what might be
wrong?
(TODO: 1. make sure the installed .jar file name agrees with the
commonly used upstream file name. 2. Narrow down the watch file of
trove and trove3 to only look for version 2 and version 3. 3. Contact
maintainers of packages with build-dep but not runtime dependencies on
trove2 whether that is intentional or some artifact.)
Regards,
Erich
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#675160: sikuli-ide: unable to process one single instruction, NoSuchMethodError: org.jruby.ext.posix.POSIX.isNative()Z
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 675160 normal Bug #675160 [sikuli-ide] sikuli-ide: unable to process one single instruction, NoSuchMethodError: org.jruby.ext.posix.POSIX.isNative()Z Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' tags 675160 + moreinfo unreproducible Bug #675160 [sikuli-ide] sikuli-ide: unable to process one single instruction, NoSuchMethodError: org.jruby.ext.posix.POSIX.isNative()Z Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 675160: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675160 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#608286: CVE-2010-4312: does not use HTTPOnly for session cookies by default
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 608286 minor Bug #608286 [tomcat6] CVE-2010-4312: does not use HTTPOnly for session cookies by default Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 608286: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608286 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: libhibernate-validator-java debdiff
It is Californian weather these days over Germany. And we have a holiday on Monday, which basically brings the country to a standstill. I am still without my key, so I cannot do a team upload and thought about helping just by putting Brian's changes into the pkg-java repository ... paired with the suggestion for Brian not to be shy and commit his stuff. This wasn't a case of being shy - I have submitted to the svn pkg-java repo but am new to git, and when I tried to access it, it timed out on me :-( It sounds a bit like Onkar (CCed) was addressing a bit of the same that Brian addressed. So, let us hope for Torsten not to have the typical vacation, @Brian: please consider updating your patch with the hindsight of the Ubuntu patch, so we can possibly coordinate our eyeballs' attention a bit in future releases, and just some friendly hello to everyone. I'll add the flag and resend. Thanks! -Brian __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: libhibernate-validator-java debdiff
Doh! Please ignore the last debdiff - I had fatfingered my email address in the changelog. One more try! On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Brian Thomason brian.thoma...@eucalyptus.com wrote: Hi Charles, Here is the updated debdiff with the flag passed. I have also uploaded to my PPA now if that is of help. (though I'm not sure if it builds on Ubuntu precise, but it does build fine in my Sid chroot) Regards, Brian P.S. Have you had a chance to get to euca2ools? On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote: Le Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:45:06PM +0200, Steffen Möller a écrit : It is Californian weather these days over Germany. And we have a holiday on Monday, which basically brings the country to a standstill. I am still without my key, so I cannot do a team upload and thought about helping just by putting Brian's changes into the pkg-java repository ... paired with the suggestion for Brian not to be shy and commit his stuff. Just, while I was at it, I learned the hard way that Brian's patch was against version 4.0.2.GA-6 (as in unstable) but the changelog in pkg-java only features 4.0.2.GA-3. Brian's patch does not apply for that reason. @Thorsten, is it OK to overwrite the git repository with what we get through apt-get source and then apply Brian's diff? Charles had already offered to help out with sponsoring, so, hoping for some rain over Japan where Charles is living, please tell us if you appreciate some extra hands. Hi all, I could not find Brian's version in his PPAs. By the way, the Ubuntu version has this small change: --- libhibernate-validator-java-4.0.2.GA/debian/libhibernate-validator-java.poms 2012-01-16 02:11:14.0 + +++ libhibernate-validator-java-4.0.2.GA/debian/libhibernate-validator-java.poms 2012-04-18 17:41:47.0 + @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ pom.xml -hibernate-validator/pom.xml +hibernate-validator/pom.xml --java-lib hibernate-validator-archetype/pom.xml --ignore hibernate-validator-legacy/pom.xml --ignore hibernate-validator-tck-runner/pom.xml --ignore Should it be applied to Debian as well ? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan libhibernate-validator-java_4.0.2.GA-7.debdiff.final Description: Binary data __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: libhibernate-validator-java debdiff
Hi Charles, Here is the updated debdiff with the flag passed. I have also uploaded to my PPA now if that is of help. (though I'm not sure if it builds on Ubuntu precise, but it does build fine in my Sid chroot) Regards, Brian P.S. Have you had a chance to get to euca2ools? On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote: Le Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:45:06PM +0200, Steffen Möller a écrit : It is Californian weather these days over Germany. And we have a holiday on Monday, which basically brings the country to a standstill. I am still without my key, so I cannot do a team upload and thought about helping just by putting Brian's changes into the pkg-java repository ... paired with the suggestion for Brian not to be shy and commit his stuff. Just, while I was at it, I learned the hard way that Brian's patch was against version 4.0.2.GA-6 (as in unstable) but the changelog in pkg-java only features 4.0.2.GA-3. Brian's patch does not apply for that reason. @Thorsten, is it OK to overwrite the git repository with what we get through apt-get source and then apply Brian's diff? Charles had already offered to help out with sponsoring, so, hoping for some rain over Japan where Charles is living, please tell us if you appreciate some extra hands. Hi all, I could not find Brian's version in his PPAs. By the way, the Ubuntu version has this small change: --- libhibernate-validator-java-4.0.2.GA/debian/libhibernate-validator-java.poms 2012-01-16 02:11:14.0 + +++ libhibernate-validator-java-4.0.2.GA/debian/libhibernate-validator-java.poms 2012-04-18 17:41:47.0 + @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ pom.xml -hibernate-validator/pom.xml +hibernate-validator/pom.xml --java-lib hibernate-validator-archetype/pom.xml --ignore hibernate-validator-legacy/pom.xml --ignore hibernate-validator-tck-runner/pom.xml --ignore Should it be applied to Debian as well ? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan libhibernate-validator-java_4.0.2.GA-7.debdiff.new Description: Binary data __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: libhibernate-validator-java debdiff
Le Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:05:25PM -0400, Brian Thomason a écrit : Doh! Please ignore the last debdiff - I had fatfingered my email address in the changelog. One more try! On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Brian Thomason brian.thoma...@eucalyptus.com wrote: Hi Charles, Here is the updated debdiff with the flag passed. I have also uploaded to my PPA now if that is of help. (though I'm not sure if it builds on Ubuntu precise, but it does build fine in my Sid chroot) Hi, it was quite useful that you uploaded to your PPA, as I first imported Onkar's changes from 4.0.2.GA-6ubuntu1, and then your changes from the PPA. I have pushed them to the Git repository on Alioth. Before I upload, I have three questions: - Can you provide a short description for debian/patches/jaxb-binding-fixes.patch - Lintian reports : W: libhibernate-validator-java: missing-classpath libhibernate3-java, libjtype-java, libgeronimo-validation-1.0-spec-java. I there somegthing to correct ? - No otherwise objections for the uplaod ? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: libhibernate-validator-java debdiff
Le Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:45:06PM +0200, Steffen Möller a écrit : It is Californian weather these days over Germany. And we have a holiday on Monday, which basically brings the country to a standstill. I am still without my key, so I cannot do a team upload and thought about helping just by putting Brian's changes into the pkg-java repository ... paired with the suggestion for Brian not to be shy and commit his stuff. Just, while I was at it, I learned the hard way that Brian's patch was against version 4.0.2.GA-6 (as in unstable) but the changelog in pkg-java only features 4.0.2.GA-3. Brian's patch does not apply for that reason. @Thorsten, is it OK to overwrite the git repository with what we get through apt-get source and then apply Brian's diff? Charles had already offered to help out with sponsoring, so, hoping for some rain over Japan where Charles is living, please tell us if you appreciate some extra hands. Hi all, I could not find Brian's version in his PPAs. By the way, the Ubuntu version has this small change: --- libhibernate-validator-java-4.0.2.GA/debian/libhibernate-validator-java.poms 2012-01-16 02:11:14.0 + +++ libhibernate-validator-java-4.0.2.GA/debian/libhibernate-validator-java.poms 2012-04-18 17:41:47.0 + @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ pom.xml -hibernate-validator/pom.xml +hibernate-validator/pom.xml --java-lib hibernate-validator-archetype/pom.xml --ignore hibernate-validator-legacy/pom.xml --ignore hibernate-validator-tck-runner/pom.xml --ignore Should it be applied to Debian as well ? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: libhibernate-validator-java debdiff
Hi Charles, On 05/28/2012 01:23 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:45:06PM +0200, Steffen Möller a écrit : It is Californian weather these days over Germany. And we have a holiday on Monday, which basically brings the country to a standstill. I am still without my key, so I cannot do a team upload and thought about helping just by putting Brian's changes into the pkg-java repository ... paired with the suggestion for Brian not to be shy and commit his stuff. Just, while I was at it, I learned the hard way that Brian's patch was against version 4.0.2.GA-6 (as in unstable) but the changelog in pkg-java only features 4.0.2.GA-3. Brian's patch does not apply for that reason. @Thorsten, is it OK to overwrite the git repository with what we get through apt-get source and then apply Brian's diff? Charles had already offered to help out with sponsoring, so, hoping for some rain over Japan where Charles is living, please tell us if you appreciate some extra hands. Hi all, I could not find Brian's version in his PPAs. I have forwarded Brian's original email to Charles in a separate email. By the way, the Ubuntu version has this small change: --- libhibernate-validator-java-4.0.2.GA/debian/libhibernate-validator-java.poms 2012-01-16 02:11:14.0 + +++ libhibernate-validator-java-4.0.2.GA/debian/libhibernate-validator-java.poms 2012-04-18 17:41:47.0 + @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ pom.xml -hibernate-validator/pom.xml +hibernate-validator/pom.xml --java-lib hibernate-validator-archetype/pom.xml --ignore hibernate-validator-legacy/pom.xml --ignore hibernate-validator-tck-runner/pom.xml --ignore Should it be applied to Debian as well ? I admit not to know the answer. Brian is good at all this and can tell, I presume. It is not in his patch from what I saw. Thank you for spotting that. We should find a way to integrate the person behind the Ubuntu work with pkg-java, I presume. libhibernate-validator-java (4.0.2.GA-6ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * Fix missing jar file from /usr/share/java. -- Onkar Shinde email address hidden Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:56:21 +0530 It sounds a bit like Onkar (CCed) was addressing a bit of the same that Brian addressed. So, let us hope for Torsten not to have the typical vacation, @Brian: please consider updating your patch with the hindsight of the Ubuntu patch, so we can possibly coordinate our eyeballs' attention a bit in future releases, and just some friendly hello to everyone. Steffen __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: libhibernate-validator-java debdiff
Yes, please add the --java-lib option to hibernate-validator, this will install hibernate-validator.jar to /usr/share/java Ludovic On 28/05/2012 13:55, Steffen Möller wrote: Hi Charles, On 05/28/2012 01:23 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:45:06PM +0200, Steffen Möller a écrit : It is Californian weather these days over Germany. And we have a holiday on Monday, which basically brings the country to a standstill. I am still without my key, so I cannot do a team upload and thought about helping just by putting Brian's changes into the pkg-java repository ... paired with the suggestion for Brian not to be shy and commit his stuff. Just, while I was at it, I learned the hard way that Brian's patch was against version 4.0.2.GA-6 (as in unstable) but the changelog in pkg-java only features 4.0.2.GA-3. Brian's patch does not apply for that reason. @Thorsten, is it OK to overwrite the git repository with what we get through apt-get source and then apply Brian's diff? Charles had already offered to help out with sponsoring, so, hoping for some rain over Japan where Charles is living, please tell us if you appreciate some extra hands. Hi all, I could not find Brian's version in his PPAs. I have forwarded Brian's original email to Charles in a separate email. By the way, the Ubuntu version has this small change: --- libhibernate-validator-java-4.0.2.GA/debian/libhibernate-validator-java.poms 2012-01-16 02:11:14.0 + +++ libhibernate-validator-java-4.0.2.GA/debian/libhibernate-validator-java.poms 2012-04-18 17:41:47.0 + @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ pom.xml -hibernate-validator/pom.xml +hibernate-validator/pom.xml --java-lib hibernate-validator-archetype/pom.xml --ignore hibernate-validator-legacy/pom.xml --ignore hibernate-validator-tck-runner/pom.xml --ignore Should it be applied to Debian as well ? I admit not to know the answer. Brian is good at all this and can tell, I presume. It is not in his patch from what I saw. Thank you for spotting that. We should find a way to integrate the person behind the Ubuntu work with pkg-java, I presume. libhibernate-validator-java (4.0.2.GA-6ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * Fix missing jar file from /usr/share/java. -- Onkar Shinde email address hidden Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:56:21 +0530 It sounds a bit like Onkar (CCed) was addressing a bit of the same that Brian addressed. So, let us hope for Torsten not to have the typical vacation, @Brian: please consider updating your patch with the hindsight of the Ubuntu patch, so we can possibly coordinate our eyeballs' attention a bit in future releases, and just some friendly hello to everyone. Steffen __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding pirl_2.3.6-1_amd64.changes
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Ansgar Burchardt ftpmas...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
the images PIRL/Database/Icons/{Im,Ex}port_24.gif contain the following
notice:
Copyright 2000 by Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved
What is the license for these?
Please reject the package until situtation is completely solved. I do
not believe thoses icons are needed for the apps, so I can re-upload
without those icons.
Thanks
--
Mathieu
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
Please use
debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding lein-clojars_0.8.0-1_amd64.changes
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl ftpmas...@debian.org wrote: Really tiny; maintainer proded Please reject lein-clojars. Noone seems to be interested on debian-java. I'll include it only without the main app. Thanks ! -- Mathieu __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#655330: Re: Bug#655330: installation of ca-certificates-java silently fails
Neither can I reproduce it on a new machine now. Thanks, good job! __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: libjetty8-java-doc and libjetty-java-doc: error when trying to install together
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 674204 libjetty-java-doc Bug #674204 [libjetty-java-doc,libjetty8-java-doc] libjetty8-java-doc and libjetty-java-doc: error when trying to install together There is no source info for the package 'libjetty-java-doc' at version 'libjetty-java-doc' with architecture '' There is no source info for the package 'libjetty8-java-doc' at version 'libjetty-java-doc' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version 'libjetty-java-doc' No longer marked as found in versions libjetty-java-doc/6.1.26-1. tags 674204 + pending Bug #674204 [libjetty-java-doc,libjetty8-java-doc] libjetty8-java-doc and libjetty-java-doc: error when trying to install together Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 674204: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674204 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding jetty8_8.1.3-1_amd64.changes
On 2012-05-21 17:07, Jakub Adam wrote: Hi Luca, On 21.5.2012 11:14, Luca Falavigna wrote: Hi, you declare a dependency on jstl1.1-java, but I can't find any reference of it. Could you please check? sorry, my mistake. Dependency should be on libjstl1.1-java not jstl1.1-java. Niels, could you please upload the corrected version [1]? Regards, Jakub [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/jetty8.git;a=commit;h=48dcff92cb5856d8f152f42ea34a37099911100a Done. :) ~Niels __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Comments regarding jetty8_8.1.3-1_amd64.changes
Hi Luca, On 21.5.2012 11:14, Luca Falavigna wrote: Hi, you declare a dependency on jstl1.1-java, but I can't find any reference of it. Could you please check? sorry, my mistake. Dependency should be on libjstl1.1-java not jstl1.1-java. Niels, could you please upload the corrected version [1]? Regards, Jakub [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/jetty8.git;a=commit;h=48dcff92cb5856d8f152f42ea34a37099911100a __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Status of Solr and Lucene in Debian
to...@tuxteam.de: Hi, I've got a question (which has possibly been beaten to death: sorry if it is so) Is there any effort underway to get a recent-ish Solr (say = 3.4) packaged for Debian? Lucene3 is underway: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/lucene3.git But Solr is orphaned for a while now with nobody interested to maintain it. It would be great, if somebody who actually uses it, would start maintaining it in Debian. Regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Status of Solr and Lucene in Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 07:22:24PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote: to...@tuxteam.de: Hi, I've got a question (which has possibly been beaten to death: sorry if it is so) Is there any effort underway to get a recent-ish Solr (say = 3.4) packaged for Debian? Lucene3 is underway: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/lucene3.git Yay! But Solr is orphaned for a while now with nobody interested to maintain it. It would be great, if somebody who actually uses it, would start maintaining it in Debian. Ugh. I've seen your hint ;-) It'd be a tall order for me (I'm as far from being a Java guy myself as one could think). OTOH this might be a chance to convince my boss to donate a couple of work hours towards this task. Echhh. Might I count on your (a collective you here) help? Where can I read up on the specific difficulties of packaging Java under Debian? Maybe. Just maybe... Regards - -- tomás -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFPuTTYBcgs9XrR2kYRAkmGAJ9zutG87h/ud7/Ygnr/FfBpp3LUvgCdGITm rd/amWiLjhCpsqaNCR1jew8= =P8Ln -END PGP SIGNATURE- __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Status of Solr and Lucene in Debian
to...@tuxteam.de: But Solr is orphaned for a while now with nobody interested to maintain it. It would be great, if somebody who actually uses it, would start maintaining it in Debian. Ugh. I've seen your hint ;-) It'd be a tall order for me (I'm as far from being a Java guy myself as one could think). OTOH this might be a chance to convince my boss to donate a couple of work hours towards this task. Echhh. Might I count on your (a collective you here) help? Where can I read up on the specific difficulties of packaging Java under Debian? I started learning the Java ecosystem myself by upgrading Solr and packaging Hadoop. However learning Debian packaging and then Java packaging isn't done in a couple of hours. On the other hand you'll really learn a lot about the system that you're using. I don't know what your company is doing but you should think twice before asking your boss for a favour and then feeling bad about misusing company time. I've been there... But on the other hand it might be an asset for your company to have somebody that knows about Debian packaging and about Java. Regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: jetty8 misses dependency on jsvc
Hi Thomas, On 18.5.2012 18:35, Thomas Koch wrote: thank you for jetty8. I built the package from your latest git tag. There's no dependency on jsvc. jsvc dependency was removed in jetty8, but I missed to delete the check for /usr/bin/jsvc existence from init script. Thanks for reporting this, I pushed a fix into git[1] and it will be corrected in the next upload. Regards, Jakub [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/jetty8.git;a=commit;h=d257a447731202cecc0921ad7b68e369d721728f __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
Le 4/30/12 12:45 PM, Rene Engelhard a écrit : Hi, On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 09:11:09AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote: I am not completly sure of this but I think v1.x and v2.x are not fully compliant. This may cause issue with some applications. Yes, API changed afaicr etc. That's *exactly* why I am trying to coordinate this and get responses from pkg-java. Since February (where there would still have been plenty of time to fix packages up if possible) NO answer from pkg-java. In case of API incompatibility, according to Policy, package should be named hsqldb2-xxx in this case. Olivier And now the RT team (understandably) thinks it's too late so we live 2.5 years more with a grossly obsolete libhsqldb-java in Debian... Regards, Rene -- gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
Le 4/30/12 1:09 AM, Rene Engelhard a écrit : Hi, On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:31:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: so I'd like to upload that to unstable (and adapt libreoffice) if it happens. But this problem makes me ask Q1) does anyone of your programs using libhsqldb-java have the same problem? Do we need to wait for them to be patches to upload 1.8.1.x? As you probably noticed, libhsqldb-java is 1.8.x while we have a libhsqldb2.0-java in experimental (and there's a 2.2.8 released, which I packaged some days ago and is ready to upload here now that I long neglected because I didn't care as OOo and LibO *do* need 1.8.x.) I am not completly sure of this but I think v1.x and v2.x are not fully compliant. This may cause issue with some applications. Q2) Would you agree that renaming libhsqldb-java to libhsqldb1.8-java would be worthwile? We then can upload 2.2.8 as libhsqldb-java. This needs source uploads of all the above packages, though. Q3) Does anyone want to overtake libhsqldb-java (2.x) then? I am only interested in 1.8.x for OOo/LO. Q4) does anyone need 2.0 *and* 2.2 be different? Anything working with 2.0 and not 2.2? (Doubt that, but better safe than sorry) - in that case we need to have libhsqldb1.8-java, libhsqldb2.0-java and the new libhsqldb-java) And noone except tillea (for debian-med)[1] answered here. pkg-java, Sebastien? Two weeks later, and rougly one month before the freeze? PING? Can you (= pkg-java and Sebastien!) please answer? Or is this silent agreement? (If so then please do not complain if a upgrade of libhsqldb-java from 1.8.0.10 to libhsqldb-java 2.2.8 breaks anything - you had advance warning. I *will* do this change - and ake LO use libhsqldb1.8-java *for sure* in the next weeks and libsqldb-java will become 2.2.8. And that upload will directly orphan the package. UNLESS you object) Regards, Rene ___ Debian-med-packaging mailing list debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging -- gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
On Apr/30, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:31:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: so I'd like to upload that to unstable (and adapt libreoffice) if it happens. But this problem makes me ask Q1) does anyone of your programs using libhsqldb-java have the same problem? Do we need to wait for them to be patches to upload 1.8.1.x? As you probably noticed, libhsqldb-java is 1.8.x while we have a libhsqldb2.0-java in experimental (and there's a 2.2.8 released, which I packaged some days ago and is ready to upload here now that I long neglected because I didn't care as OOo and LibO *do* need 1.8.x.) Q2) Would you agree that renaming libhsqldb-java to libhsqldb1.8-java would be worthwile? We then can upload 2.2.8 as libhsqldb-java. This needs source uploads of all the above packages, though. Q3) Does anyone want to overtake libhsqldb-java (2.x) then? I am only interested in 1.8.x for OOo/LO. Q4) does anyone need 2.0 *and* 2.2 be different? Anything working with 2.0 and not 2.2? (Doubt that, but better safe than sorry) - in that case we need to have libhsqldb1.8-java, libhsqldb2.0-java and the new libhsqldb-java) And noone except tillea (for debian-med)[1] answered here. pkg-java, Sebastien? Two weeks later, and rougly one month before the freeze? PING? Can you (= pkg-java and Sebastien!) please answer? Sorry for the lag, real life has been a bit hectic lately. I'm fine with your upload plan, and will make my paros package depend on libhsqldb1.8-java once you upload it. paros is not maintained upstream anymore, but I will be able to take care of its patching to ensure 1.8.1.x compatibility, if need be. Cheers, --Seb __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
Hi, On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 09:11:09AM +0200, olivier.sal...@codeless.fr wrote: I am not completly sure of this but I think v1.x and v2.x are not fully compliant. This may cause issue with some applications. Yes, API changed afaicr etc. That's *exactly* why I am trying to coordinate this and get responses from pkg-java. Since February (where there would still have been plenty of time to fix packages up if possible) NO answer from pkg-java. And now the RT team (understandably) thinks it's too late so we live 2.5 years more with a grossly obsolete libhsqldb-java in Debian... Regards, Rene __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: planning (a) hsqldb transition(s)
Hi, On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:31:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: so I'd like to upload that to unstable (and adapt libreoffice) if it happens. But this problem makes me ask Q1) does anyone of your programs using libhsqldb-java have the same problem? Do we need to wait for them to be patches to upload 1.8.1.x? As you probably noticed, libhsqldb-java is 1.8.x while we have a libhsqldb2.0-java in experimental (and there's a 2.2.8 released, which I packaged some days ago and is ready to upload here now that I long neglected because I didn't care as OOo and LibO *do* need 1.8.x.) Q2) Would you agree that renaming libhsqldb-java to libhsqldb1.8-java would be worthwile? We then can upload 2.2.8 as libhsqldb-java. This needs source uploads of all the above packages, though. Q3) Does anyone want to overtake libhsqldb-java (2.x) then? I am only interested in 1.8.x for OOo/LO. Q4) does anyone need 2.0 *and* 2.2 be different? Anything working with 2.0 and not 2.2? (Doubt that, but better safe than sorry) - in that case we need to have libhsqldb1.8-java, libhsqldb2.0-java and the new libhsqldb-java) And noone except tillea (for debian-med)[1] answered here. pkg-java, Sebastien? Two weeks later, and rougly one month before the freeze? PING? Can you (= pkg-java and Sebastien!) please answer? Or is this silent agreement? (If so then please do not complain if a upgrade of libhsqldb-java from 1.8.0.10 to libhsqldb-java 2.2.8 breaks anything - you had advance warning. I *will* do this change - and ake LO use libhsqldb1.8-java *for sure* in the next weeks and libsqldb-java will become 2.2.8. And that upload will directly orphan the package. UNLESS you object) Regards, Rene __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: pirl_2.3.4.dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Luca, On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Luca Falavigna ftpmas...@debian.org wrote: several files are licensed under LGPL-2.1. Please fix your copyright file. The explanation in the d/README.source was not clear ? Upstream did messed up the licensing. PIRL was /supposed/ to be GPL-2. Anyway after talking with upstream they went throught the whole codebase and relicensed everything under a clear LGPL-3, which has been uploaded as version 2.3.6. Thanks -- Mathieu __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: [PATCH] libitext-java: Helping to fix build-depends-on-obsolete-package default-jdk-builddep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 669157 + pending Bug #669157 [libitext-java] [PATCH] libitext-java: Helping to fix build-depends-on-obsolete-package default-jdk-builddep Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 669157: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669157 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: [PATCH] pdfsam: fix build-depends-on-obsolete-package default-jdk-builddep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 669258 + pending Bug #669258 [pdfsam] [PATCH] pdfsam: fix build-depends-on-obsolete-package default-jdk-builddep Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 669258: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669258 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: pirl_2.3.4.dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Il 18 aprile 2012 09:00, Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com ha scritto: The explanation in the d/README.source was not clear ? Upstream did messed up the licensing. PIRL was /supposed/ to be GPL-2. It's advisable to put this kind of information directly in the copyright file, as it's the preferred source to seek for copyright stuff, and the file FTP Team looks into. Anyway after talking with upstream they went throught the whole codebase and relicensed everything under a clear LGPL-3, which has been uploaded as version 2.3.6. Nice, I'll do another review ASAP. Cheers, Luca __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#668400: /usr/bin/apt-get: Apt-get purge/remove delete file behind symlink
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 668400 tomcat7,dpkg Bug #668400 [apt] /usr/bin/apt-get: Apt-get purge/remove delete file behind symlink Bug reassigned from package 'apt' to 'tomcat7,dpkg'. No longer marked as found in versions apt/0.8.15.10. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #668400 to the same values previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 668400: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668400 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#667513: sikuli-ide: crashes when selecting part of screenshot: tesseract::Classify::CharNormClassifier
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 667513 + confirmed Bug #667513 [sikuli-ide] sikuli-ide: crashes when selecting part of screenshot: tesseract::Classify::CharNormClassifier Added tag(s) confirmed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 667513: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667513 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Bug#636136: Re: [solved] update system is not working
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Davide Prina: I'm behind a proxy server with password. I have configured eclipse to use the proxy server for http, https and socket. To let eclipse to work correctly with update/install you must not set proxy for socket. Being in a similar situation this solved my network connection problem as well. Many thanks, Davide! Best regards, Alexander. -- Alexander Mader alexander.ma...@kapp-niles.com Fon: +49-30-93033-4557 NILES Werkzeugmaschinen GmbH Fax: +49-30-93033-4003 www.niles.de GPG public key: http://mader.seppi.de/pubkey-dienst.asc Ubuntu: staroafrykańskie słowo oznaczające Nie umiem zainstalować Debiana __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: gradle: Update package version to upstream (e.g. 1.0-m9).
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 667077 667078 Bug #667077 [gradle] gradle: Update package version to upstream (e.g. 1.0-m9). Bug #667078 [gradle] gradle: Update package version to upstream (e.g. 1.0-m9). Merged 667077 667078 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 667077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667077 667078: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667078 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: jenkins-commons-jelly: FTBFS: missing javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 665231 libservlet2.5-java Bug #665231 [src:jenkins-commons-jelly] jenkins-commons-jelly: FTBFS: missing javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:debian Bug reassigned from package 'src:jenkins-commons-jelly' to 'libservlet2.5-java'. No longer marked as found in versions jenkins-commons-jelly/1.1-jenkins-20110627-2. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #665231 to the same values previously set retitle 665231 libservlet2.5-java: Provide debian version symlink in Maven repo Bug #665231 [libservlet2.5-java] jenkins-commons-jelly: FTBFS: missing javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:debian Changed Bug title to 'libservlet2.5-java: Provide debian version symlink in Maven repo' from 'jenkins-commons-jelly: FTBFS: missing javax.servlet:servlet-api:jar:debian' forcemerge 665393 665231 Bug #665393 [libservlet2.5-java] libservlet2.5-java: Provide debian version symlink in Maven repo Bug #665231 [libservlet2.5-java] libservlet2.5-java: Provide debian version symlink in Maven repo Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' Marked as found in versions tomcat6/6.0.35-1. Added tag(s) pending. Bug #665393 [libservlet2.5-java] libservlet2.5-java: Provide debian version symlink in Maven repo Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. Merged 665231 665393 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665231 665393: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665393 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#663548: stapler: FTBFS: IO error: opening debian/libstapler-java/debian/libstapler-java//usr/share/java/stapler.jar for read : No such file or directory
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 663548 + patch Bug #663548 [stapler] stapler: FTBFS: IO error: opening debian/libstapler-java/debian/libstapler-java//usr/share/java/stapler.jar for read : No such file or directory Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 663548: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663548 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: jellydoc: FTBFS: jh_manifest: debian/libjellydoc-java/usr/share/java/taglib-xml-writer.jar: No such file or directory
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 665066 + pending Bug #665066 [src:jellydoc] jellydoc: FTBFS: jh_manifest: debian/libjellydoc-java/usr/share/java/taglib-xml-writer.jar: No such file or directory Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665066: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665066 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#665076: libjpfcodegen-java: FTBFS: [javac] CodeGenerator.java:223: cannot find symbol
reassign 665076 velocity 1.7-2 retitle 665076 velocity: /usr/share/java/velocity.jar missing affects 665076 libjpfcodegen-java thanks On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:20:39 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: libjpfcodegen-java Version: 0.4+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120321 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. compile: [mkdir] Created dir: /«BUILDDIR»/libjpfcodegen-java-0.4+dfsg/build [javac] /«BUILDDIR»/libjpfcodegen-java-0.4+dfsg/build.xml:53: warning: 'includeantruntime' was not set, defaulting to build.sysclasspath=last; set to false for repeatable builds [javac] Compiling 5 source files to /«BUILDDIR»/libjpfcodegen-java-0.4+dfsg/build [javac] CodeGenerator.java:25: package org.apache.velocity does not exist [javac] import org.apache.velocity.Template; [javac] ^ This looks like a problem in velocity: % dpkg -L velocity /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/velocity /usr/share/doc/velocity/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/velocity/copyright /usr/share/doc/velocity/README.Debian /usr/share/maven-repo /usr/share/maven-repo/org /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/velocity /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/velocity/velocity /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/velocity/velocity/1.7 /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/velocity/velocity/1.7/velocity-1.7.jar /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/velocity/velocity/1.7/velocity-1.7.pom /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/velocity/velocity/debian /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/velocity/velocity/debian/velocity-debian.pom /etc /etc/velocity /etc/velocity/velocity.properties /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/velocity/velocity/debian/velocity-debian.jar If my understanding of the java policy is correct, there should be a /usr/share/java/velocity.jar file or symlink, which went missing at some point. - Ok, 1.7-1 still has it, 1.7-2 doesn't (and libjpfcodegen-java builds against 1.7-1 but not against -2 and -3). Please add it back :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Alannah Myles: Black Velvet signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Intent to NMU jspwiki to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs
Hello Christian, Please excuse the late reply. I will prepare an upload of jspwiki to occur according to the schedule below (that is, accepting translation updates until March 26th). Thank you, tony On 03/12/2012 11:11 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: Dear Debian maintainer, The jspwiki Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes for po-debconf, namely bug number 619304 (and maybe other similar bugs). The i18n team is now hunting the very last bits of missing localization and your package went on our radar. You may have uploaded recently but, unfortunately for you, you then got *another* l10n bug report. So, sorry for this, but the radar beeped at your package and here am I with an NMU intent...:-) I have the intention, as part of a more general action of the Debian i18n Task Force to build and possibly upload a non-maintainer upload for jspwiki in order to fix this as well as all pending translations for the debconf templates. Of course, an upload made by you would even be better...:-) Such changes are always harmless, which explains why I safely consider building NMUs for such issues even though they're obviously non critical. The schedule for the NMU (in case it happens, that is if you agree with it or if I don't receive any answer in 2 days) is roughly the following: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 : send this notice Saturday, March 17, 2012 : post a NMU announcement to debian-i18n with you (maintainer) CC'ed this can happen earlier if the maintainer agrees In such case, the deadlines below will also happen earlier Sunday, March 25, 2012 : (midnight) deadline for receiving translation updates Monday, March 26, 2012 : build the package and upload it to DELAYED/7-day send the NMU patch to the BTS Monday, April 02, 2012 : NMU reaches incoming If you intent to upload yourself, please notify me so that I interrupt the process on my side. Please also don't upload without a discussion with me. Some translators might send a few new translations and I can handle a round of translation updates for you. Really, don't upload silently...:-) In case I upload an NMU, I will subscribe to the Package Tracking System for jspwiki and follow its life for 60 days after my NMU in order to fix any issue potentially introduced by my upload. Let me know, as soon as possible, if you have any kind of objection to this process. If you'd rather do the fix yourself, I will of course leave the package alone. Same if you have reasons not to do the update now. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: Bug#663913: libxerces2-java: installs broken symlink (/usr/share/java/xmlParserAPIs.jar)
Hi Niels, Thanks for filing the bug. The versioned dependency on libxml-commons-external-java (= 1.4.01-2) entailed updating those links, which has been fixed in SVN. I wanted to check with the team to see if anyone objected to an upload. Thanks, tony On 03/13/2012 03:47 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: Package: libxerces2-java Version: 2.11.0-5 Severity: normal Hi, $ ls -l /usr/share/java/xmlParserAPIs.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Feb 2 07:16 /usr/share/java/xmlParserAPIs.jar - jaxp-1.3.jar $ ls -l /usr/share/java/jaxp-1.3.jar ls: cannot access /usr/share/java/jaxp-1.3.jar: No such file or directory $ ls -l /usr/share/java/jaxp-*.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Aug 27 2011 /usr/share/java/jaxp-1.4.jar - xml-apis-1.4.01.jar Looks like the xmlParserAPIs.jar link needs to be updated. ~Niels __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Re: update for sun-java package
On 2012-03-14 03:43, Willian Braga wrote: Hello Maintainers: Hi, My name's Willian and I'm a Linux Mint 12 user (wheezy/sid in /etc/debian_version) :) I was checking the plugins I'm using in Firefox with Plugin Check page ( http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/) and it reported me that my Java plugin is outdated. Also, they told me there are some security risk running this outdated version. The version it reported me was 1.6.0_26, which is the same I'm using over here. I was reading the changelog from version from 1.6.0_27 to 1.6.0_31 and there are some security vulnerabilities which were fixed, but we are missing them because the official debian package is not updated. Those security are below: I am a bit pedantic here, but there never was an official Debian package for sun-java (it was non-free and therefore not a part of Debian). [...] So I would like to know if you guys could update it. I know how to manually update it, but i think it's important to update the debian package as well because it would update all Debian users and alike. [...] Thanks, Willian. Unfortunately we cannot. Oracle no longer provides sun-java (or oracle-java) under a license we can use for distributing the non-free Java[1]. We can offer you is openjdk-6 or openjdk-7; I know there have been (and probably still are) cases were openjdk did not work as well as sun-java. If you experience such with openjdk, I would highly recommend you report those so those issues can be fixed. If openjdk is simply not a feasible alternative, I believe that the package java-package (in sid/Wheezy) can be used to construct a deb from the manual downloaded sun-java. It has the advantage that dpkg/apt is aware of your local Java installation and will use that if possible. ~Niels [1] http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2011/08/26/sun_java6_packages_removed_from_debian_u http://sylvestre.ledru.info/blog/sylvestre/2011/10/25/removal_of_sun_java6_from_debian http://mrpogson.com/2011/12/14/sun-java-no-longer-welcome-in-debian-gnulinux/ __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: libjasper-java: Please replace dependencies on Servlet 2.4 library
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 658804 + patch Bug #658804 [src:libjasper-java] libjasper-java: Please replace dependencies on Servlet 2.4 library Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658804: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658804 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: sisu-ioc: Fix FTBFS and ensure jar's installed to /usr/share/java
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: severity 662789 serious Bug #662789 [sisu-ioc] sisu-ioc: Fix FTBFS and ensure jar's installed to /usr/share/java Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662789: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662789 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: Bug#661450: FTBFS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 658806 + pending Bug #658806 [src:velocity] velocity: Please replace dependencies on Servlet 2.4 library Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #658806 to the same tags previously set thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658806 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: FTBFS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 661450 + pending Bug #661450 [ehcache] ehcache: FTBFS: missing method setXAResourceHolderState in class net.sf.ehcache.transaction.manager.btm.EhCacheXAResourceHolder Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 661450: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661450 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
Processed: Re: FTBFS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 661450 ehcache: FTBFS: missing method setXAResourceHolderState in class net.sf.ehcache.transaction.manager.btm.EhCacheXAResourceHolder Bug #661450 [ehcache] FTBFS Changed Bug title to 'ehcache: FTBFS: missing method setXAResourceHolderState in class net.sf.ehcache.transaction.manager.btm.EhCacheXAResourceHolder' from 'FTBFS' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 661450: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661450 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
