Re: [RFR] templates://hadoop/{hadoop-namenoded.templates}

2010-03-31 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Justin B Rye (j...@edlug.org.uk): Justin B Rye wrote: comments but no actual patch attached. Second thoughts and patch. As usuall, all suggestions adopted..:) signature.asc Description: Digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

[RFR] templates://hadoop/{hadoop-namenoded.templates}

2010-03-30 Thread Christian PERRIER
Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages descriptions for the hadoop source package. This review will last from Tuesday, March 30, 2010 to Friday, April 09, 2010. Please send reviews as unified diffs (diff -u) against the original files. Comments about your proposed changes

Re: [RFR] templates://hadoop/{hadoop-namenoded.templates}

2010-03-30 Thread Thomas Koch
Thank you Christian for the thorough review. It feels very good to get the help of older DDs. I'm very comfortable with your improvements and would like to apply them without further changes. Best regards, Thomas Christian PERRIER: Please find, for review, the debconf templates and packages

Re: [RFR] templates://hadoop/{hadoop-namenoded.templates}

2010-03-30 Thread Justin B Rye
Christian PERRIER wrote: Your review should be sent as an answer to this mail. Sorry, I'm running late, comments but no actual patch attached. Template: hadoop-namenoded/format [...] +_Description: Should the namenode's file system be formatted? The namenode manages the Hadoop Distributed

Re: [RFR] templates://hadoop/{hadoop-namenoded.templates}

2010-03-30 Thread Justin B Rye
Justin B Rye wrote: comments but no actual patch attached. Second thoughts and patch. Template: hadoop-namenoded/format [...] The namenode manages the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS). Like a normal file system, it needs to be formatted before use; otherwise the namenode

Re: [RFR] templates://hadoop/{hadoop-namenoded.templates}

2010-03-30 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Justin B Rye (j...@edlug.org.uk): Christian PERRIER wrote: Your review should be sent as an answer to this mail. Sorry, I'm running late, comments but no actual patch attached. No problem. based on your comments and proposals, I cooked the attached review. Source: hadoop Section: