On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
for eclipse afaict.
The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license.
Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
for eclipse afaict.
The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license.
Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 05:32:44AM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
for eclipse afaict.
The only reason it was pursued was because it has the
severity 507536 serious
thanks
pure unstable/amd64 system here. I just installed eclipse to test something and
I
got this problem too.
When starting eclipse from command line i got:
a...@pryan:$ eclipse
searching for compatible vm...
testing /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk...not found
testing
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:26 PM, Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org wrote:
severity 507536 serious
thanks
pure unstable/amd64 system here. I just installed eclipse to test something
and I
got this problem too.
When starting eclipse from command line i got:
a...@pryan:$ eclipse
searching
Please try openjdk instead of gcj, gcj has never been really reliable
for eclipse afaict.
The only reason it was pursued was because it has the right license.
Now with openjdk, gcj should probably be deprecated (at least for eclipse).
Also, make sure you have installed xulrunner-dev or the
6 matches
Mail list logo
