Forwarded from -devel
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should
this package be orphaned?)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009
From: Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org
To: Jerry Haltom was...@larvalstage.net, Michael Koch konque
Project? Maybe
they have some resources they can spend on that?
Regards, Markus
2009/6/15 Andrew Vaughan ajv-li...@netspace.net.au
Forwarded from -devel
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse:
should this package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
From: Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org
Third and last warning, I will orphan eclipse next saturday (20th June),
Perhaps the right thing to do is simply to have eclipse removed from the
archive. It is way too outdated to be useful now, and would
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
From: Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org
Third and last warning, I will orphan eclipse next saturday (20th June),
Perhaps the right thing to do is simply to have eclipse
* Markus Knauer mkna...@innoopract.com [2009-06-15 06:21]:
Or did you contact one of the persons of the Linux Distro Project? Maybe they
have some resources they can spend on that?
Unfortunately, we do not (and we're now known as the Linux Tools Project
:) . However, we are working on making
Hi, can I be of any help? (I would take it over)
I can offer my time but i think i need some help.
Background:
I'm working with eclipse since version (~3.0) and with debian linux
since 5 years. I have some knowledge in building debian packages.
---
Jens Kapitza
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jens Kapitza wrote:
Hi, can I be of any help? (I would take it over)
I can offer my time but i think i need some help.
About half a year ago I offered sponsoring packages to push
things but I have basically zero Java experience and can only
check about Debian policy and
Thanks for dropping an answer...
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:18:06PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Ana Guerrero schrieb:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:40:49AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
I filed the quoted report almost 3 weeks ago. Resending to people listed as
eclipse uploaders in case they
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:41:45PM +0300, Pantelis Koukousoulas wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Marcus Bettermar...@better.se wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
From: Ana Guerrero a...@debian.org
Third and last warning, I will orphan eclipse next
Hi Markus, Jens and list:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:52:34PM +0200, Jens Kapitza wrote:
Hi, can I be of any help? (I would take it over)
I can offer my time but i think i need some help.
You could ask to join the java team for maintaining eclipse, so you can commit
in the pkg-java's SVN and
On Mon Jun 15 16:32, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jens Kapitza wrote:
I can offer my time but i think i need some help.
About half a year ago I offered sponsoring packages to push
things but I have basically zero Java experience and can only
check about Debian policy and stuff
Removing the eclipse 3.2 from the archive would be fine with me, fwiw,
especially if it motivates anyone to contribute towards getting 3.5 in.
I think removing directly is not a good idea. It is a widely used
application, so I am really hoping somebody gets interested in maintaining it.
But
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 13:21, Pantelis Koukousoulas pkt...@gmail.comwrote:
Perhaps the eclipse package can be replaced with an installer-type
thingie (a-la fwcutter) that just brings in the appropriate dependencies
(e.g., openjdk, xulrunner etc) and arranges for the upstream binary
to be
I filed the quoted report almost 3 weeks ago. Resending to people listed as
eclipse uploaders in case they did not get it.
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-6.1
Severity: important
After being hit by #507536 (merged with #511713,
Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-6.1
Severity: important
After being hit by #507536 (merged with #511713, #515747) and read
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507536#104
I have been looking at the status of eclipse in Debian.
Eclipse's packaging is under the umbrella of the Debian
I completely agree with Ana, this package needs new fresh blood to
maintain it. I repromised myself (some time ago) to give it some love,
but I didn't managed to have time to.
IMO this should be orphaned, and let another team aggregate to maintain it.
Regards,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph,
16 matches
Mail list logo
