On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:18:59PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:51:59PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
You are receiving this email because you happen to be listed as maintainer
or co-maintainer of a reverse dependency of libxul0d.
As you may already know, the
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:51:59PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
You are receiving this email because you happen to be listed as maintainer
or co-maintainer of a reverse dependency of libxul0d.
As you may already know, the plan for lenny concerning Mozilla/libxul would
be to ship with
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chmsee
yes, very easy to fix, but I have to use '-rpath' in LDFLAGS, how to
fix this problem?
--
Best Regards,
LI Daobing
___
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:49 PM, LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chmsee
yes, very easy to fix, but I have to use '-rpath' in LDFLAGS, how to
fix this problem?
and the
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:51:59PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
Hi,
You are receiving this email because you happen to be listed as maintainer
or co-maintainer of a reverse dependency of libxul0d.
As you may already know, the plan for lenny concerning Mozilla/libxul would
be to ship with
Sorry, for the explicit reply to all, but since we have a bunch of
patches for that in ubuntu, I thought it might concern you maintainers
as well ...
all that i removed below were duplicates in the list ...
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:51:59PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
Hi,
You are receiving this email because you happen to be listed as maintainer
or co-maintainer of a reverse dependency of libxul0d.
As you may already know, the plan for lenny concerning Mozilla/libxul would
be to ship with version 1.9. Now, while it would be nice to *only* ship 1.9,
it would
7 matches
Mail list logo