On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 21:03 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:43 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > oh, "btw": jessie has -2, sid -3, with changes unsuitable for wheezy and
> > > targeted at jessie. this
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:43 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> oh, "btw": jessie has -2, sid -3, with changes unsuitable for wheezy and
> targeted at jessie. this needs an unblock request to let -3 migrate to jessie
> and have the binaries removed from sid first... anybody doing this?
It needs more
On Sun, 23, Nov, 2014 at 10:29:59AM +0100, Holger Levsen spoke thus..
Hi,
On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
Version check failed:
Your upload included the source package tomcat6, version 6.0.41-2+squeeze5,
however stable already has version 6.0.35-6+deb7u1.
On 11/23/2014 04:16 AM, Mark Hymers wrote:
On Sun, 23, Nov, 2014 at 10:29:59AM +0100, Holger Levsen spoke thus..
Hi,
On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
Version check failed:
Your upload included the source package tomcat6, version 6.0.41-2+squeeze5,
however stable
On 11/23/2014 12:03 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:43 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
oh, btw: jessie has -2, sid -3, with changes unsuitable for wheezy and
targeted at jessie. this needs an unblock request to let
On 11/23/2014 01:16 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, tony mancill wrote:
The cruft report for unstable will look *very* different due to 6.0.41-3
being a *radically* different package.
no, the report exactly looks like this *because* of this:
* Build
Le 23/11/2014 22:09, tony mancill a écrit :
The decision/requirement to remove tomcat6 from jessie has been
requested by the Security team for quite a while, and the 6.0.41-3
source upload effectively does this by just building libservlet2.5-java
(without which we would have many packages
7 matches
Mail list logo