Bug#542162: closed by Ludovic Claude ludovic.cla...@laposte.net (Bug#542162: fixed in maven2 2.2.1-1)

2009-09-07 Thread Matthieu Baechler
Hi, On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Debian Bug Tracking Systemow...@bugs.debian.org wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the maven2 package: #542162: maven2: mvn command fail right after installing the package It has been closed by

Bug#542162: closed by Ludovic Claude ludovic.cla...@laposte.net (Bug#542162: fixed in maven2 2.2.1-1)

2009-09-07 Thread Ludovic Claude
Hello Matthieu, Yes, I'd like a list of classes, or at least the packages they belong to. I have fixed plexus-interpolation and libslf4j-java which were compiled with Java 1.6 and included in Maven. In my builds, I could not see any other issues, but if you have older package versions, or if

Processed: notfound 439725 in antlr/2.7.6-9

2009-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: notfound 439725 antlr/2.7.6-9 Bug #439725 {Done: Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de} [antlr] antlr: New upstream source (3.01) Bug No longer marked as found in versions antlr/2.7.6-9. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#540737: libantlr2.7-cil: installation into Mono fails (no strong name)

2009-09-07 Thread Michael Koch
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:44:25PM +0200, Michael Koch wrote: tag 540737 + confirmed thanks On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 09:14:49PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: | Setting up libantlr2.7-cil (2.7.7-11) ... | * Installing 2 assemblies from libantlr2.7-cil into Mono | E: installing Assembly

reassign 439725 to antlr3

2009-09-07 Thread Michael Koch
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny6 reassign 439725 antlr3 ___ pkg-java-maintainers mailing list pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers

Processed: reassign 439725 to antlr3

2009-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny6 reassign 439725 antlr3 Bug #439725 {Done: Michael Koch konque...@gmx.de} [antlr] antlr: New upstream source (3.01) Bug reassigned from package 'antlr' to 'antlr3'. Bug No

Processing of excalibur-logkit_2.0-1_amd64.changes

2009-09-07 Thread Archive Administrator
excalibur-logkit_2.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.dsc excalibur-logkit_2.0.orig.tar.gz excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.diff.gz libexcalibur-logkit-java_2.0-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host

excalibur-logkit_2.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2009-09-07 Thread Archive Administrator
(new) excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.diff.gz optional java (new) excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.dsc optional java (new) excalibur-logkit_2.0.orig.tar.gz optional java (new) libexcalibur-logkit-java_2.0-1_all.deb optional java Lightweight and fast designed logging toolkit for Java Excalibur Logkit (previously

excalibur-logkit_2.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-09-07 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/e/excalibur-logkit/excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.diff.gz excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.dsc to pool/main/e/excalibur-logkit/excalibur-logkit_2.0-1.dsc excalibur-logkit_2.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/e/excalibur-logkit/excalibur-logkit_2.0.orig.tar.gz

Bug#506355: marked as done (provide antlr library as a separate package)

2009-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:52:41 +0200 with message-id 20090907195241.gu2...@quadriga.konqueror.de and subject line closing #506355 has caused the Debian Bug report #506355, regarding provide antlr library as a separate package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: RFS: jetty (New upstream release - fixes RC bug)

2009-09-07 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi Ludovic, On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Ludovic Claudeludovic.cla...@laposte.net wrote: I'm pushing back quickly in SVN the fixes I made for the jetty6 package into jetty, can you have a look at them and release them? why do we have a new binary package libjetty-extra package now? What was

Processing of antlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.changes

2009-09-07 Thread Archive Administrator
antlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz libantlr2.7-cil_2.7.7-14_all.deb antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb libantlr-java_2.7.7-14_all.deb python-antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb

antlr_2.7.7-14_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-09-07 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr-doc_2.7.7-14_all.deb antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14.diff.gz antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14.dsc antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb to pool/main/a/antlr/antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb

Bug#540737: marked as done (libantlr2.7-cil: installation into Mono fails (no strong name))

2009-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:33:02 + with message-id e1mkmli-x9...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#540737: fixed in antlr 2.7.7-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #540737, regarding libantlr2.7-cil: installation into Mono fails (no strong name) to be marked as done. This

Re: RFS: jetty (New upstream release - fixes RC bug)

2009-09-07 Thread Ludovic Claude
Hi Torsten, libjetty-setuid-java contained both Java and native code, and this caused problems during the builds as highlighted by Thierry Carrez. From Thieery Carrez: Build on i386 succeeded (as it is the one used in the all build) but amd64 fails (missing servlet and slf4j classes...)

antlr override disparity

2009-09-07 Thread Archive Administrator
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): antlr_2.7.7-14_all.deb: package says section is java, override says devel. libantlr-java-gcj_2.7.7-14_amd64.deb: package says section is java, override says devel. Please note that a

Bug#523051: marked as done (antlr-config --cxxflags doesn't work)

2009-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:33:01 + with message-id e1mkmlh-x6...@ries.debian.org and subject line Bug#523051: fixed in antlr 2.7.7-14 has caused the Debian Bug report #523051, regarding antlr-config --cxxflags doesn't work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Processing of libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-8_amd64.changes

2009-09-07 Thread Archive Administrator
libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-8_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-8.dsc libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0.orig.tar.gz libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-8.diff.gz libjgrapht0.6-java_0.6.0-8_all.deb libjgrapht0.6-java-link_0.6.0-8_all.deb

Bug#505596: FTBFS with GCC 4.4: dereferencing type-punned pointer...

2009-09-07 Thread Michael Koch
forwarded 505596 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41303 tag 505596 + upstream thanks On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:17:08PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Package: classpath Version: 2:0.97.2-1.1 User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.4 Your package fails to build

Processed: Re: Bug#505596: FTBFS with GCC 4.4: dereferencing type-punned pointer...

2009-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 505596 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41303 Bug #505596 [classpath] FTBFS with GCC 4.4: dereferencing type-punned pointer... Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41303'. tag 505596 +